Fistyboy [1733255]

I could get past “governments are mass importing 3rd world migrants”and calling Michelle Obama’s book “anti-white propaganda” and calling LGBTQ “destructive lifestyles” that’s all basic bigotry. Calling Internet of things a “globe spanning technocratic grid” is just plain stupidity, and worse stupidity trying to sound intelligent, someone TLDR the rest of the video please, not going to waste my time.

Show post

broleaf [3140943]

1 Yes, all those migrants who have flooded into Europe over the past decade have not caused crime and ****s to skyrocket. They totally are not a drain on society and government resources. Truly, we have the next wave of scientists. [1] [2] [3]

2 Regarding Michelle Obama, she has brought up the concept of systemic racism on multiple occasions. A view, might I add, is seen as a made-up theory. To summarize, systemic racism goes somewhat like this: 'Look at how this non-white demographic is doing negatively in society in contrast to whites. We don't have evidence for why this is so, so we assume it's systemic racism.' It's as anti-academic as it gets, and ironically, it is racist in itself, sequentially for its reasoning of accusing whites of something without the aforementioned evidence. Sequentially, this makes her an anti-white bigot. [4]

3 Referring to LGBTQ as 'destructive lifestyles' is a perspective from a Christian standpoint. We consider that entire umbrella group incompatible with our spiritual and traditional worldview. Thus, it sits in the contemporary context realm in parallel to us. And I'm more than willing to recycle and expand outward from that argument, from that theorem if one would like, just request. Unless you think the LGBTQ should be differentiated from the rest of the contemporary contextual non-spirituals. Supplementally, I'll even throw in a tidbit: multi-diverse ethos in a singular society has an atomizing effect on society. [5]

4 Ah, yes, the Internet of Things, its acronym being IoT. I'm assuming you're not familiar with the terminology there. It's as technocratic as it gets, to be honest. Not sure what else to add, so I'll drop a research paper regarding its topic to showcase your ignorance.
IoT and AI for Smart Government: A Research Agenda


source table
Economic migrants' crime effects [1]
Foreign-born rapists in Sweden [2]
Refugees overwhelming safety nets [3]
Michelle Obama [4]
The Downside of Diversity[5]

Bracing for counter arguments of triggered, incoherent drivel, screams, and ad hominems.

Fistyboy [1733255]

Social responsibility to accept refugees is one thing, but you are painting all migrants with the same bigoted brush. The video goes on to talk about how these migrants are less competent than white Americans(note not Americans in general). Yeah, neo-nazi written all over it.

Systemic racism is real but I won't try to convince you because I suspect that's a lost cause

LGBTQ is not a destructive lifestyle

IoT refers to everyday devices connected to each other, like how you connect your phone to your front door, oven, or lights. It's as technocratic as a remote control

broleaf [3140943]

Social responsibility to accept refugees is one thing, but you are painting all migrants with the same bigoted brush. The video goes on to talk about how these migrants are less competent than white Americans(note not Americans in general). Yeah, neo-nazi written all over it.


1 Rationally, in a contemporary context, explain why we should morally accept refugees due to some sort of social responsibility.


Or is it just a "muh feels" feelings and a lack thereof of logic? I already presented sources saying it's harmful.

2 The video utilizes statistics; I'm sorry, but the truth and reality don't fit your narrative. Furthermore, it showcases America's white population and how, despite the vast majority being white, they are a minority in the accepted hires in many corporations and government positions. If anything, it highlights anti-white racism occurring. Ironically, it inverts the concept of systemic racism.


3 "Neo-Nazi" a interesting choice of word since it seems he does not like technocracy, and I saw no mention of socialism; if anything, he attacked that.




Systemic racism is real but I won't try to convince you because I suspect that's a lost cause



Feel free to use logic and evidence to prove it then. I have already argued that you can't, but I also pointed out that it's used only by people who are racist towards whites

I see you, racist fistyboy, for what you are.



LGBTQ is not a destructive lifestyle


Firstly, Using the United States as an example, where 63% of the population identifies as Christian, a religion that is incompatible with LGBTQ lifestyles, explain how it isnt destructive for the society its a polarizing area thus sequentially harmful to said society at large. Secondly, explain how the suicide rates a derivative of the aforementioned umbrella, and as well please clarify how this is not inherently an observed factual destructive behavior.

IoT refers to everyday devices connected to each other, like how you connect your phone to your front door, oven, or lights. It's as technocratic as a remote control


excerpt of the source i provided "Smart government has been envisioned as an adaptive evolution of e-government, in response to rapid digital technological change, to innovate the ways the government can achieve better citizen engagement, accountability, and interoperability"

Ironically, it seems you're committing a sunk cost fallacy at the moment, trying to double down on your ignorance of IoT and how it was utilized in the video.

"how it was utilized in the video." context matters in philosophy.

"meaning P ", "knowing that P ", "having a reason to A ", and possibly even "being true" or "being right" only have meaning relative to a specified context. It should be self-explanatory, by the way.

Capgros [2088627]

If you post videos that use Neonazi arguments..If it walks like a duck....

Also YouTube videos are not necessarily truth, statistics can be easily made up, or taken completely out of context. You are too dumb to see this.

broleaf [3140943]

the boy who cried nazi nazi





"Neo-Nazi" a interesting choice of word since it seems he does not like technocracy, and I saw no mention of socialism; if anything, he attacked that.

I've already countered that attempt, but feel free to formulate an opposition counter.

Helpful suggestion.

You might want to look up the definition of what a Nazi is, then refrain from calling him that and instead reduce him to a racist, albeit even so, you'd struggle with that. Because then we could paint every woke person of color as a racist who utilizes systemic racism theory using synonymous logic in the context he brought up matters regarding whites.

broleaf [3140943]

1 Yes, all those migrants who have flooded into Europe over the past decade have not caused crime and ****s to skyrocket. They totally are not a drain on society and government resources. Truly, we have the next wave of scientists. [1] [2] [3]

2 Regarding Michelle Obama, she has brought up the concept of systemic racism on multiple occasions. A view, might I add, is seen as a made-up theory. To summarize, systemic racism goes somewhat like this: 'Look at how this non-white demographic is doing negatively in society in contrast to whites. We don't have evidence for why this is so, so we assume it's systemic racism.' It's as anti-academic as it gets, and ironically, it is racist in itself, sequentially for its reasoning of accusing whites of something without the aforementioned evidence. Sequentially, this makes her an anti-white bigot. [4]

3 Referring to LGBTQ as 'destructive lifestyles' is a perspective from a Christian standpoint. We consider that entire umbrella group incompatible with our spiritual and traditional worldview. Thus, it sits in the contemporary context realm in parallel to us. And I'm more than willing to recycle and expand outward from that argument, from that theorem if one would like, just request. Unless you think the LGBTQ should be differentiated from the rest of the contemporary contextual non-spirituals. Supplementally, I'll even throw in a tidbit: multi-diverse ethos in a singular society has an atomizing effect on society. [5]

4 Ah, yes, the Internet of Things, its acronym being IoT. I'm assuming you're not familiar with the terminology there. It's as technocratic as it gets, to be honest. Not sure what else to add, so I'll drop a research paper regarding its topic to showcase your ignorance.
IoT and AI for Smart Government: A Research Agenda


source table
Economic migrants' crime effects [1]
Foreign-born rapists in Sweden [2]
Refugees overwhelming safety nets [3]
Michelle Obama [4]
The Downside of Diversity[5]

Bracing for counter arguments of triggered, incoherent drivel, screams, and ad hominems.

Show post

Fistyboy [1733255]

Social responsibility to accept refugees is one thing, but you are painting all migrants with the same bigoted brush. The video goes on to talk about how these migrants are less competent than white Americans(note not Americans in general). Yeah, neo-nazi written all over it.

Systemic racism is real but I won't try to convince you because I suspect that's a lost cause

LGBTQ is not a destructive lifestyle

IoT refers to everyday devices connected to each other, like how you connect your phone to your front door, oven, or lights. It's as technocratic as a remote control

broleaf [3140943]

Social responsibility to accept refugees is one thing, but you are painting all migrants with the same bigoted brush. The video goes on to talk about how these migrants are less competent than white Americans(note not Americans in general). Yeah, neo-nazi written all over it.


1 Rationally, in a contemporary context, explain why we should morally accept refugees due to some sort of social responsibility.


Or is it just a "muh feels" feelings and a lack thereof of logic? I already presented sources saying it's harmful.

2 The video utilizes statistics; I'm sorry, but the truth and reality don't fit your narrative. Furthermore, it showcases America's white population and how, despite the vast majority being white, they are a minority in the accepted hires in many corporations and government positions. If anything, it highlights anti-white racism occurring. Ironically, it inverts the concept of systemic racism.


3 "Neo-Nazi" a interesting choice of word since it seems he does not like technocracy, and I saw no mention of socialism; if anything, he attacked that.




Systemic racism is real but I won't try to convince you because I suspect that's a lost cause



Feel free to use logic and evidence to prove it then. I have already argued that you can't, but I also pointed out that it's used only by people who are racist towards whites

I see you, racist fistyboy, for what you are.



LGBTQ is not a destructive lifestyle


Firstly, Using the United States as an example, where 63% of the population identifies as Christian, a religion that is incompatible with LGBTQ lifestyles, explain how it isnt destructive for the society its a polarizing area thus sequentially harmful to said society at large. Secondly, explain how the suicide rates a derivative of the aforementioned umbrella, and as well please clarify how this is not inherently an observed factual destructive behavior.

IoT refers to everyday devices connected to each other, like how you connect your phone to your front door, oven, or lights. It's as technocratic as a remote control


excerpt of the source i provided "Smart government has been envisioned as an adaptive evolution of e-government, in response to rapid digital technological change, to innovate the ways the government can achieve better citizen engagement, accountability, and interoperability"

Ironically, it seems you're committing a sunk cost fallacy at the moment, trying to double down on your ignorance of IoT and how it was utilized in the video.

"how it was utilized in the video." context matters in philosophy.

"meaning P ", "knowing that P ", "having a reason to A ", and possibly even "being true" or "being right" only have meaning relative to a specified context. It should be self-explanatory, by the way.

Capgros [2088627]

If you post videos that use Neonazi arguments..If it walks like a duck....

Also YouTube videos are not necessarily truth, statistics can be easily made up, or taken completely out of context. You are too dumb to see this.

broleaf [3140943]

the boy who cried nazi nazi





"Neo-Nazi" a interesting choice of word since it seems he does not like technocracy, and I saw no mention of socialism; if anything, he attacked that.

I've already countered that attempt, but feel free to formulate an opposition counter.

Helpful suggestion.

You might want to look up the definition of what a Nazi is, then refrain from calling him that and instead reduce him to a racist, albeit even so, you'd struggle with that. Because then we could paint every woke person of color as a racist who utilizes systemic racism theory using synonymous logic in the context he brought up matters regarding whites.

Capgros [2088627]

I get it why you are trying to rebrand, but you are still too obvious.

Fistyboy [1733255]

Social responsibility to accept refugees is one thing, but you are painting all migrants with the same bigoted brush. The video goes on to talk about how these migrants are less competent than white Americans(note not Americans in general). Yeah, neo-nazi written all over it.

Systemic racism is real but I won't try to convince you because I suspect that's a lost cause

LGBTQ is not a destructive lifestyle

IoT refers to everyday devices connected to each other, like how you connect your phone to your front door, oven, or lights. It's as technocratic as a remote control

Show post

broleaf [3140943]

Social responsibility to accept refugees is one thing, but you are painting all migrants with the same bigoted brush. The video goes on to talk about how these migrants are less competent than white Americans(note not Americans in general). Yeah, neo-nazi written all over it.


1 Rationally, in a contemporary context, explain why we should morally accept refugees due to some sort of social responsibility.


Or is it just a "muh feels" feelings and a lack thereof of logic? I already presented sources saying it's harmful.

2 The video utilizes statistics; I'm sorry, but the truth and reality don't fit your narrative. Furthermore, it showcases America's white population and how, despite the vast majority being white, they are a minority in the accepted hires in many corporations and government positions. If anything, it highlights anti-white racism occurring. Ironically, it inverts the concept of systemic racism.


3 "Neo-Nazi" a interesting choice of word since it seems he does not like technocracy, and I saw no mention of socialism; if anything, he attacked that.




Systemic racism is real but I won't try to convince you because I suspect that's a lost cause



Feel free to use logic and evidence to prove it then. I have already argued that you can't, but I also pointed out that it's used only by people who are racist towards whites

I see you, racist fistyboy, for what you are.



LGBTQ is not a destructive lifestyle


Firstly, Using the United States as an example, where 63% of the population identifies as Christian, a religion that is incompatible with LGBTQ lifestyles, explain how it isnt destructive for the society its a polarizing area thus sequentially harmful to said society at large. Secondly, explain how the suicide rates a derivative of the aforementioned umbrella, and as well please clarify how this is not inherently an observed factual destructive behavior.

IoT refers to everyday devices connected to each other, like how you connect your phone to your front door, oven, or lights. It's as technocratic as a remote control


excerpt of the source i provided "Smart government has been envisioned as an adaptive evolution of e-government, in response to rapid digital technological change, to innovate the ways the government can achieve better citizen engagement, accountability, and interoperability"

Ironically, it seems you're committing a sunk cost fallacy at the moment, trying to double down on your ignorance of IoT and how it was utilized in the video.

"how it was utilized in the video." context matters in philosophy.

"meaning P ", "knowing that P ", "having a reason to A ", and possibly even "being true" or "being right" only have meaning relative to a specified context. It should be self-explanatory, by the way.

Capgros [2088627]

If you post videos that use Neonazi arguments..If it walks like a duck....

Also YouTube videos are not necessarily truth, statistics can be easily made up, or taken completely out of context. You are too dumb to see this.

broleaf [3140943]

the boy who cried nazi nazi





"Neo-Nazi" a interesting choice of word since it seems he does not like technocracy, and I saw no mention of socialism; if anything, he attacked that.

I've already countered that attempt, but feel free to formulate an opposition counter.

Helpful suggestion.

You might want to look up the definition of what a Nazi is, then refrain from calling him that and instead reduce him to a racist, albeit even so, you'd struggle with that. Because then we could paint every woke person of color as a racist who utilizes systemic racism theory using synonymous logic in the context he brought up matters regarding whites.

Capgros [2088627]

I get it why you are trying to rebrand, but you are still too obvious.

broleaf [3140943]

Expand on that then. Why are you incapable of formulating an argument instead of making mere statements?

broleaf [3140943]

Social responsibility to accept refugees is one thing, but you are painting all migrants with the same bigoted brush. The video goes on to talk about how these migrants are less competent than white Americans(note not Americans in general). Yeah, neo-nazi written all over it.


1 Rationally, in a contemporary context, explain why we should morally accept refugees due to some sort of social responsibility.


Or is it just a "muh feels" feelings and a lack thereof of logic? I already presented sources saying it's harmful.

2 The video utilizes statistics; I'm sorry, but the truth and reality don't fit your narrative. Furthermore, it showcases America's white population and how, despite the vast majority being white, they are a minority in the accepted hires in many corporations and government positions. If anything, it highlights anti-white racism occurring. Ironically, it inverts the concept of systemic racism.


3 "Neo-Nazi" a interesting choice of word since it seems he does not like technocracy, and I saw no mention of socialism; if anything, he attacked that.




Systemic racism is real but I won't try to convince you because I suspect that's a lost cause



Feel free to use logic and evidence to prove it then. I have already argued that you can't, but I also pointed out that it's used only by people who are racist towards whites

I see you, racist fistyboy, for what you are.



LGBTQ is not a destructive lifestyle


Firstly, Using the United States as an example, where 63% of the population identifies as Christian, a religion that is incompatible with LGBTQ lifestyles, explain how it isnt destructive for the society its a polarizing area thus sequentially harmful to said society at large. Secondly, explain how the suicide rates a derivative of the aforementioned umbrella, and as well please clarify how this is not inherently an observed factual destructive behavior.

IoT refers to everyday devices connected to each other, like how you connect your phone to your front door, oven, or lights. It's as technocratic as a remote control


excerpt of the source i provided "Smart government has been envisioned as an adaptive evolution of e-government, in response to rapid digital technological change, to innovate the ways the government can achieve better citizen engagement, accountability, and interoperability"

Ironically, it seems you're committing a sunk cost fallacy at the moment, trying to double down on your ignorance of IoT and how it was utilized in the video.

"how it was utilized in the video." context matters in philosophy.

"meaning P ", "knowing that P ", "having a reason to A ", and possibly even "being true" or "being right" only have meaning relative to a specified context. It should be self-explanatory, by the way.

Show post

Capgros [2088627]

If you post videos that use Neonazi arguments..If it walks like a duck....

Also YouTube videos are not necessarily truth, statistics can be easily made up, or taken completely out of context. You are too dumb to see this.

broleaf [3140943]

the boy who cried nazi nazi





"Neo-Nazi" a interesting choice of word since it seems he does not like technocracy, and I saw no mention of socialism; if anything, he attacked that.

I've already countered that attempt, but feel free to formulate an opposition counter.

Helpful suggestion.

You might want to look up the definition of what a Nazi is, then refrain from calling him that and instead reduce him to a racist, albeit even so, you'd struggle with that. Because then we could paint every woke person of color as a racist who utilizes systemic racism theory using synonymous logic in the context he brought up matters regarding whites.

Capgros [2088627]

I get it why you are trying to rebrand, but you are still too obvious.

broleaf [3140943]

Expand on that then. Why are you incapable of formulating an argument instead of making mere statements?

Capgros [2088627]

You obviously got my message, but pretend it's not clear.

Capgros [2088627]

If you post videos that use Neonazi arguments..If it walks like a duck....

Also YouTube videos are not necessarily truth, statistics can be easily made up, or taken completely out of context. You are too dumb to see this.

Show post

broleaf [3140943]

the boy who cried nazi nazi





"Neo-Nazi" a interesting choice of word since it seems he does not like technocracy, and I saw no mention of socialism; if anything, he attacked that.

I've already countered that attempt, but feel free to formulate an opposition counter.

Helpful suggestion.

You might want to look up the definition of what a Nazi is, then refrain from calling him that and instead reduce him to a racist, albeit even so, you'd struggle with that. Because then we could paint every woke person of color as a racist who utilizes systemic racism theory using synonymous logic in the context he brought up matters regarding whites.

Capgros [2088627]

I get it why you are trying to rebrand, but you are still too obvious.

broleaf [3140943]

Expand on that then. Why are you incapable of formulating an argument instead of making mere statements?

Capgros [2088627]

You obviously got my message, but pretend it's not clear.

broleaf [3140943]

Either expand and formulate an actual argument, addressing also your failure to understand the definition, by the way, of what a Nazi is, or I won't provide you further merit in my responses, since you obviously have given up and admit you lost the argument.

broleaf [3140943]

Social responsibility to accept refugees is one thing, but you are painting all migrants with the same bigoted brush. The video goes on to talk about how these migrants are less competent than white Americans(note not Americans in general). Yeah, neo-nazi written all over it.


1 Rationally, in a contemporary context, explain why we should morally accept refugees due to some sort of social responsibility.


Or is it just a "muh feels" feelings and a lack thereof of logic? I already presented sources saying it's harmful.

2 The video utilizes statistics; I'm sorry, but the truth and reality don't fit your narrative. Furthermore, it showcases America's white population and how, despite the vast majority being white, they are a minority in the accepted hires in many corporations and government positions. If anything, it highlights anti-white racism occurring. Ironically, it inverts the concept of systemic racism.


3 "Neo-Nazi" a interesting choice of word since it seems he does not like technocracy, and I saw no mention of socialism; if anything, he attacked that.




Systemic racism is real but I won't try to convince you because I suspect that's a lost cause



Feel free to use logic and evidence to prove it then. I have already argued that you can't, but I also pointed out that it's used only by people who are racist towards whites

I see you, racist fistyboy, for what you are.



LGBTQ is not a destructive lifestyle


Firstly, Using the United States as an example, where 63% of the population identifies as Christian, a religion that is incompatible with LGBTQ lifestyles, explain how it isnt destructive for the society its a polarizing area thus sequentially harmful to said society at large. Secondly, explain how the suicide rates a derivative of the aforementioned umbrella, and as well please clarify how this is not inherently an observed factual destructive behavior.

IoT refers to everyday devices connected to each other, like how you connect your phone to your front door, oven, or lights. It's as technocratic as a remote control


excerpt of the source i provided "Smart government has been envisioned as an adaptive evolution of e-government, in response to rapid digital technological change, to innovate the ways the government can achieve better citizen engagement, accountability, and interoperability"

Ironically, it seems you're committing a sunk cost fallacy at the moment, trying to double down on your ignorance of IoT and how it was utilized in the video.

"how it was utilized in the video." context matters in philosophy.

"meaning P ", "knowing that P ", "having a reason to A ", and possibly even "being true" or "being right" only have meaning relative to a specified context. It should be self-explanatory, by the way.

Show post

Capgros [2088627]

If you post videos that use Neonazi arguments..If it walks like a duck....

Also YouTube videos are not necessarily truth, statistics can be easily made up, or taken completely out of context. You are too dumb to see this.

broleaf [3140943]

the boy who cried nazi nazi





"Neo-Nazi" a interesting choice of word since it seems he does not like technocracy, and I saw no mention of socialism; if anything, he attacked that.

I've already countered that attempt, but feel free to formulate an opposition counter.

Helpful suggestion.

You might want to look up the definition of what a Nazi is, then refrain from calling him that and instead reduce him to a racist, albeit even so, you'd struggle with that. Because then we could paint every woke person of color as a racist who utilizes systemic racism theory using synonymous logic in the context he brought up matters regarding whites.

Capgros [2088627]

I get it why you are trying to rebrand, but you are still too obvious.

broleaf [3140943]

Expand on that then. Why are you incapable of formulating an argument instead of making mere statements?

Capgros [2088627]

You obviously got my message, but pretend it's not clear.

Capgros [2088627]

If you post videos that use Neonazi arguments..If it walks like a duck....

Also YouTube videos are not necessarily truth, statistics can be easily made up, or taken completely out of context. You are too dumb to see this.

Show post

broleaf [3140943]

the boy who cried nazi nazi





"Neo-Nazi" a interesting choice of word since it seems he does not like technocracy, and I saw no mention of socialism; if anything, he attacked that.

I've already countered that attempt, but feel free to formulate an opposition counter.

Helpful suggestion.

You might want to look up the definition of what a Nazi is, then refrain from calling him that and instead reduce him to a racist, albeit even so, you'd struggle with that. Because then we could paint every woke person of color as a racist who utilizes systemic racism theory using synonymous logic in the context he brought up matters regarding whites.

Capgros [2088627]

I get it why you are trying to rebrand, but you are still too obvious.

broleaf [3140943]

Expand on that then. Why are you incapable of formulating an argument instead of making mere statements?

Capgros [2088627]

You obviously got my message, but pretend it's not clear.

broleaf [3140943]

Ah, so your argument is that if a Christian does not adhere to contemporary modernity, they are all neo-Nazis

Yeah, I don't think that deserves a merit of response; it's offensive and beneath me. But I'm glad that's what I've reduced you to.

Sorry, I missed this meme in your post earlier.

broleaf [3140943]

the boy who cried nazi nazi





"Neo-Nazi" a interesting choice of word since it seems he does not like technocracy, and I saw no mention of socialism; if anything, he attacked that.

I've already countered that attempt, but feel free to formulate an opposition counter.

Helpful suggestion.

You might want to look up the definition of what a Nazi is, then refrain from calling him that and instead reduce him to a racist, albeit even so, you'd struggle with that. Because then we could paint every woke person of color as a racist who utilizes systemic racism theory using synonymous logic in the context he brought up matters regarding whites.

Show post

Capgros [2088627]

I get it why you are trying to rebrand, but you are still too obvious.

broleaf [3140943]

Expand on that then. Why are you incapable of formulating an argument instead of making mere statements?

Capgros [2088627]

You obviously got my message, but pretend it's not clear.

broleaf [3140943]

Ah, so your argument is that if a Christian does not adhere to contemporary modernity, they are all neo-Nazis

Yeah, I don't think that deserves a merit of response; it's offensive and beneath me. But I'm glad that's what I've reduced you to.

Sorry, I missed this meme in your post earlier.

Capgros [2088627]

You literally believe in a neochristian monarchy, which could have as well a Hitler as fuhrer king

Most Christians are not like you,. So this is about you, not about christianity


to quote you from another thread:

"Diversity for the sake of diversity isn't even a positive; it's illogical from an atheist perspective if we reduce them to animals. Why should the white human animal support some moral argument of competing with the black human animal in the shared society? Sounds illogical, especially trying to enforce such a conceptual ideal. Did you not argue that tribalism is a thing seems like you're conflicted; there's some illogical inconsistency?"

That's right from the Neonazi book, that is just there

Capgros [2088627]

I get it why you are trying to rebrand, but you are still too obvious.

Show post

broleaf [3140943]

Expand on that then. Why are you incapable of formulating an argument instead of making mere statements?

Capgros [2088627]

You obviously got my message, but pretend it's not clear.

broleaf [3140943]

Ah, so your argument is that if a Christian does not adhere to contemporary modernity, they are all neo-Nazis

Yeah, I don't think that deserves a merit of response; it's offensive and beneath me. But I'm glad that's what I've reduced you to.

Sorry, I missed this meme in your post earlier.

Capgros [2088627]

You literally believe in a neochristian monarchy, which could have as well a Hitler as fuhrer king

Most Christians are not like you,. So this is about you, not about christianity


to quote you from another thread:

"Diversity for the sake of diversity isn't even a positive; it's illogical from an atheist perspective if we reduce them to animals. Why should the white human animal support some moral argument of competing with the black human animal in the shared society? Sounds illogical, especially trying to enforce such a conceptual ideal. Did you not argue that tribalism is a thing seems like you're conflicted; there's some illogical inconsistency?"

That's right from the Neonazi book, that is just there

broleaf [3140943]

Taken out of context. Wow, aren't you desperate? Lol.

link to exact quote

Feel free to join that conversation as well. We have been discussing how atheists can't conceptualize morality rationally since it would be illogical.

broleaf [3140943]

Expand on that then. Why are you incapable of formulating an argument instead of making mere statements?

Show post

Capgros [2088627]

You obviously got my message, but pretend it's not clear.

broleaf [3140943]

Ah, so your argument is that if a Christian does not adhere to contemporary modernity, they are all neo-Nazis

Yeah, I don't think that deserves a merit of response; it's offensive and beneath me. But I'm glad that's what I've reduced you to.

Sorry, I missed this meme in your post earlier.

Capgros [2088627]

You literally believe in a neochristian monarchy, which could have as well a Hitler as fuhrer king

Most Christians are not like you,. So this is about you, not about christianity


to quote you from another thread:

"Diversity for the sake of diversity isn't even a positive; it's illogical from an atheist perspective if we reduce them to animals. Why should the white human animal support some moral argument of competing with the black human animal in the shared society? Sounds illogical, especially trying to enforce such a conceptual ideal. Did you not argue that tribalism is a thing seems like you're conflicted; there's some illogical inconsistency?"

That's right from the Neonazi book, that is just there

broleaf [3140943]

Taken out of context. Wow, aren't you desperate? Lol.

link to exact quote

Feel free to join that conversation as well. We have been discussing how atheists can't conceptualize morality rationally since it would be illogical.

Capgros [2088627]

No it's not.

Capgros [2088627]

You obviously got my message, but pretend it's not clear.

Show post

broleaf [3140943]

Ah, so your argument is that if a Christian does not adhere to contemporary modernity, they are all neo-Nazis

Yeah, I don't think that deserves a merit of response; it's offensive and beneath me. But I'm glad that's what I've reduced you to.

Sorry, I missed this meme in your post earlier.

Capgros [2088627]

You literally believe in a neochristian monarchy, which could have as well a Hitler as fuhrer king

Most Christians are not like you,. So this is about you, not about christianity


to quote you from another thread:

"Diversity for the sake of diversity isn't even a positive; it's illogical from an atheist perspective if we reduce them to animals. Why should the white human animal support some moral argument of competing with the black human animal in the shared society? Sounds illogical, especially trying to enforce such a conceptual ideal. Did you not argue that tribalism is a thing seems like you're conflicted; there's some illogical inconsistency?"

That's right from the Neonazi book, that is just there

broleaf [3140943]

Taken out of context. Wow, aren't you desperate? Lol.

link to exact quote

Feel free to join that conversation as well. We have been discussing how atheists can't conceptualize morality rationally since it would be illogical.

Capgros [2088627]

No it's not.

broleaf [3140943]

Taken out of context. Wow, aren't you desperate? Lol.

link to exact quote

Feel free to join that conversation as well. We have been discussing how atheists can't conceptualize morality rationally since it would be illogical.

repost since you are dense.

also Ironically, it was the atheist who used that argumentative position, comparing humans to animals. This has to be the most communist, low IQ attempt at misdirection I ever witnessed.

broleaf [3140943]

Ah, so your argument is that if a Christian does not adhere to contemporary modernity, they are all neo-Nazis

Yeah, I don't think that deserves a merit of response; it's offensive and beneath me. But I'm glad that's what I've reduced you to.

Sorry, I missed this meme in your post earlier.

Show post

Capgros [2088627]

You literally believe in a neochristian monarchy, which could have as well a Hitler as fuhrer king

Most Christians are not like you,. So this is about you, not about christianity


to quote you from another thread:

"Diversity for the sake of diversity isn't even a positive; it's illogical from an atheist perspective if we reduce them to animals. Why should the white human animal support some moral argument of competing with the black human animal in the shared society? Sounds illogical, especially trying to enforce such a conceptual ideal. Did you not argue that tribalism is a thing seems like you're conflicted; there's some illogical inconsistency?"

That's right from the Neonazi book, that is just there

broleaf [3140943]

Taken out of context. Wow, aren't you desperate? Lol.

link to exact quote

Feel free to join that conversation as well. We have been discussing how atheists can't conceptualize morality rationally since it would be illogical.

Capgros [2088627]

No it's not.

broleaf [3140943]

Taken out of context. Wow, aren't you desperate? Lol.

link to exact quote

Feel free to join that conversation as well. We have been discussing how atheists can't conceptualize morality rationally since it would be illogical.

repost since you are dense.

also Ironically, it was the atheist who used that argumentative position, comparing humans to animals. This has to be the most communist, low IQ attempt at misdirection I ever witnessed.

Capgros [2088627]

I'm not desperate at all, anyway, people like you, I have seen here before a lot of time, and normally it doesn't take long before you get banned, you just can't help yourselves.

You just reflect your own thought patterns on atheists, why most don't even think like you lol.

Capgros [2088627]

You literally believe in a neochristian monarchy, which could have as well a Hitler as fuhrer king

Most Christians are not like you,. So this is about you, not about christianity


to quote you from another thread:

"Diversity for the sake of diversity isn't even a positive; it's illogical from an atheist perspective if we reduce them to animals. Why should the white human animal support some moral argument of competing with the black human animal in the shared society? Sounds illogical, especially trying to enforce such a conceptual ideal. Did you not argue that tribalism is a thing seems like you're conflicted; there's some illogical inconsistency?"

That's right from the Neonazi book, that is just there

Show post

broleaf [3140943]

Taken out of context. Wow, aren't you desperate? Lol.

link to exact quote

Feel free to join that conversation as well. We have been discussing how atheists can't conceptualize morality rationally since it would be illogical.

Capgros [2088627]

No it's not.

broleaf [3140943]

Taken out of context. Wow, aren't you desperate? Lol.

link to exact quote

Feel free to join that conversation as well. We have been discussing how atheists can't conceptualize morality rationally since it would be illogical.

repost since you are dense.

also Ironically, it was the atheist who used that argumentative position, comparing humans to animals. This has to be the most communist, low IQ attempt at misdirection I ever witnessed.

Capgros [2088627]

I'm not desperate at all, anyway, people like you, I have seen here before a lot of time, and normally it doesn't take long before you get banned, you just can't help yourselves.

You just reflect your own thought patterns on atheists, why most don't even think like you lol.

broleaf [3140943]

Oh, worry not; I'm not going anywhere. I can use my big brain with reasoning and logic to always convey my points. If anything, it'll be your side that gets driven out of here due to embarrassment and lack, therefore, of any intellectual merit.

broleaf [3140943]

Taken out of context. Wow, aren't you desperate? Lol.

link to exact quote

Feel free to join that conversation as well. We have been discussing how atheists can't conceptualize morality rationally since it would be illogical.

Show post

Capgros [2088627]

No it's not.

broleaf [3140943]

Taken out of context. Wow, aren't you desperate? Lol.

link to exact quote

Feel free to join that conversation as well. We have been discussing how atheists can't conceptualize morality rationally since it would be illogical.

repost since you are dense.

also Ironically, it was the atheist who used that argumentative position, comparing humans to animals. This has to be the most communist, low IQ attempt at misdirection I ever witnessed.

Capgros [2088627]

I'm not desperate at all, anyway, people like you, I have seen here before a lot of time, and normally it doesn't take long before you get banned, you just can't help yourselves.

You just reflect your own thought patterns on atheists, why most don't even think like you lol.

broleaf [3140943]

Oh, worry not; I'm not going anywhere. I can use my big brain with reasoning and logic to always convey my points. If anything, it'll be your side that gets driven out of here due to embarrassment and lack, therefore, of any intellectual merit.

Capgros [2088627]

I'm not worried, let's see where your "big" brain gets you.

Capgros [2088627]

No it's not.

Show post

broleaf [3140943]

Taken out of context. Wow, aren't you desperate? Lol.

link to exact quote

Feel free to join that conversation as well. We have been discussing how atheists can't conceptualize morality rationally since it would be illogical.

repost since you are dense.

also Ironically, it was the atheist who used that argumentative position, comparing humans to animals. This has to be the most communist, low IQ attempt at misdirection I ever witnessed.

Capgros [2088627]

I'm not desperate at all, anyway, people like you, I have seen here before a lot of time, and normally it doesn't take long before you get banned, you just can't help yourselves.

You just reflect your own thought patterns on atheists, why most don't even think like you lol.

broleaf [3140943]

Oh, worry not; I'm not going anywhere. I can use my big brain with reasoning and logic to always convey my points. If anything, it'll be your side that gets driven out of here due to embarrassment and lack, therefore, of any intellectual merit.

Capgros [2088627]

I'm not worried, let's see where your "big" brain gets you.

broleaf [3140943]

Fistyboy [1733255]

I could get past “governments are mass importing 3rd world migrants”and calling Michelle Obama’s book “anti-white propaganda” and calling LGBTQ “destructive lifestyles” that’s all basic bigotry. Calling Internet of things a “globe spanning technocratic grid” is just plain stupidity, and worse stupidity trying to sound intelligent, someone TLDR the rest of the video please, not going to waste my time.

Show post

broleaf [3140943]

1 Yes, all those migrants who have flooded into Europe over the past decade have not caused crime and ****s to skyrocket. They totally are not a drain on society and government resources. Truly, we have the next wave of scientists. [1] [2] [3]

2 Regarding Michelle Obama, she has brought up the concept of systemic racism on multiple occasions. A view, might I add, is seen as a made-up theory. To summarize, systemic racism goes somewhat like this: 'Look at how this non-white demographic is doing negatively in society in contrast to whites. We don't have evidence for why this is so, so we assume it's systemic racism.' It's as anti-academic as it gets, and ironically, it is racist in itself, sequentially for its reasoning of accusing whites of something without the aforementioned evidence. Sequentially, this makes her an anti-white bigot. [4]

3 Referring to LGBTQ as 'destructive lifestyles' is a perspective from a Christian standpoint. We consider that entire umbrella group incompatible with our spiritual and traditional worldview. Thus, it sits in the contemporary context realm in parallel to us. And I'm more than willing to recycle and expand outward from that argument, from that theorem if one would like, just request. Unless you think the LGBTQ should be differentiated from the rest of the contemporary contextual non-spirituals. Supplementally, I'll even throw in a tidbit: multi-diverse ethos in a singular society has an atomizing effect on society. [5]

4 Ah, yes, the Internet of Things, its acronym being IoT. I'm assuming you're not familiar with the terminology there. It's as technocratic as it gets, to be honest. Not sure what else to add, so I'll drop a research paper regarding its topic to showcase your ignorance.
IoT and AI for Smart Government: A Research Agenda


source table
Economic migrants' crime effects [1]
Foreign-born rapists in Sweden [2]
Refugees overwhelming safety nets [3]
Michelle Obama [4]
The Downside of Diversity[5]

Bracing for counter arguments of triggered, incoherent drivel, screams, and ad hominems.

Fistyboy [1733255]

Social responsibility to accept refugees is one thing, but you are painting all migrants with the same bigoted brush. The video goes on to talk about how these migrants are less competent than white Americans(note not Americans in general). Yeah, neo-nazi written all over it.

Systemic racism is real but I won't try to convince you because I suspect that's a lost cause

LGBTQ is not a destructive lifestyle

IoT refers to everyday devices connected to each other, like how you connect your phone to your front door, oven, or lights. It's as technocratic as a remote control

broleaf [3140943]

Social responsibility to accept refugees is one thing, but you are painting all migrants with the same bigoted brush. The video goes on to talk about how these migrants are less competent than white Americans(note not Americans in general). Yeah, neo-nazi written all over it.


1 Rationally, in a contemporary context, explain why we should morally accept refugees due to some sort of social responsibility.


Or is it just a "muh feels" feelings and a lack thereof of logic? I already presented sources saying it's harmful.

2 The video utilizes statistics; I'm sorry, but the truth and reality don't fit your narrative. Furthermore, it showcases America's white population and how, despite the vast majority being white, they are a minority in the accepted hires in many corporations and government positions. If anything, it highlights anti-white racism occurring. Ironically, it inverts the concept of systemic racism.


3 "Neo-Nazi" a interesting choice of word since it seems he does not like technocracy, and I saw no mention of socialism; if anything, he attacked that.




Systemic racism is real but I won't try to convince you because I suspect that's a lost cause



Feel free to use logic and evidence to prove it then. I have already argued that you can't, but I also pointed out that it's used only by people who are racist towards whites

I see you, racist fistyboy, for what you are.



LGBTQ is not a destructive lifestyle


Firstly, Using the United States as an example, where 63% of the population identifies as Christian, a religion that is incompatible with LGBTQ lifestyles, explain how it isnt destructive for the society its a polarizing area thus sequentially harmful to said society at large. Secondly, explain how the suicide rates a derivative of the aforementioned umbrella, and as well please clarify how this is not inherently an observed factual destructive behavior.

IoT refers to everyday devices connected to each other, like how you connect your phone to your front door, oven, or lights. It's as technocratic as a remote control


excerpt of the source i provided "Smart government has been envisioned as an adaptive evolution of e-government, in response to rapid digital technological change, to innovate the ways the government can achieve better citizen engagement, accountability, and interoperability"

Ironically, it seems you're committing a sunk cost fallacy at the moment, trying to double down on your ignorance of IoT and how it was utilized in the video.

"how it was utilized in the video." context matters in philosophy.

"meaning P ", "knowing that P ", "having a reason to A ", and possibly even "being true" or "being right" only have meaning relative to a specified context. It should be self-explanatory, by the way.

Capgros [2088627]

If you post videos that use Neonazi arguments..If it walks like a duck....

Also YouTube videos are not necessarily truth, statistics can be easily made up, or taken completely out of context. You are too dumb to see this.

broleaf [3140943]

the boy who cried nazi nazi





"Neo-Nazi" a interesting choice of word since it seems he does not like technocracy, and I saw no mention of socialism; if anything, he attacked that.

I've already countered that attempt, but feel free to formulate an opposition counter.

Helpful suggestion.

You might want to look up the definition of what a Nazi is, then refrain from calling him that and instead reduce him to a racist, albeit even so, you'd struggle with that. Because then we could paint every woke person of color as a racist who utilizes systemic racism theory using synonymous logic in the context he brought up matters regarding whites.

broleaf [3140943]

1 Yes, all those migrants who have flooded into Europe over the past decade have not caused crime and ****s to skyrocket. They totally are not a drain on society and government resources. Truly, we have the next wave of scientists. [1] [2] [3]

2 Regarding Michelle Obama, she has brought up the concept of systemic racism on multiple occasions. A view, might I add, is seen as a made-up theory. To summarize, systemic racism goes somewhat like this: 'Look at how this non-white demographic is doing negatively in society in contrast to whites. We don't have evidence for why this is so, so we assume it's systemic racism.' It's as anti-academic as it gets, and ironically, it is racist in itself, sequentially for its reasoning of accusing whites of something without the aforementioned evidence. Sequentially, this makes her an anti-white bigot. [4]

3 Referring to LGBTQ as 'destructive lifestyles' is a perspective from a Christian standpoint. We consider that entire umbrella group incompatible with our spiritual and traditional worldview. Thus, it sits in the contemporary context realm in parallel to us. And I'm more than willing to recycle and expand outward from that argument, from that theorem if one would like, just request. Unless you think the LGBTQ should be differentiated from the rest of the contemporary contextual non-spirituals. Supplementally, I'll even throw in a tidbit: multi-diverse ethos in a singular society has an atomizing effect on society. [5]

4 Ah, yes, the Internet of Things, its acronym being IoT. I'm assuming you're not familiar with the terminology there. It's as technocratic as it gets, to be honest. Not sure what else to add, so I'll drop a research paper regarding its topic to showcase your ignorance.
IoT and AI for Smart Government: A Research Agenda


source table
Economic migrants' crime effects [1]
Foreign-born rapists in Sweden [2]
Refugees overwhelming safety nets [3]
Michelle Obama [4]
The Downside of Diversity[5]

Bracing for counter arguments of triggered, incoherent drivel, screams, and ad hominems.

Show post

Fistyboy [1733255]

Social responsibility to accept refugees is one thing, but you are painting all migrants with the same bigoted brush. The video goes on to talk about how these migrants are less competent than white Americans(note not Americans in general). Yeah, neo-nazi written all over it.

Systemic racism is real but I won't try to convince you because I suspect that's a lost cause

LGBTQ is not a destructive lifestyle

IoT refers to everyday devices connected to each other, like how you connect your phone to your front door, oven, or lights. It's as technocratic as a remote control

broleaf [3140943]

Social responsibility to accept refugees is one thing, but you are painting all migrants with the same bigoted brush. The video goes on to talk about how these migrants are less competent than white Americans(note not Americans in general). Yeah, neo-nazi written all over it.


1 Rationally, in a contemporary context, explain why we should morally accept refugees due to some sort of social responsibility.


Or is it just a "muh feels" feelings and a lack thereof of logic? I already presented sources saying it's harmful.

2 The video utilizes statistics; I'm sorry, but the truth and reality don't fit your narrative. Furthermore, it showcases America's white population and how, despite the vast majority being white, they are a minority in the accepted hires in many corporations and government positions. If anything, it highlights anti-white racism occurring. Ironically, it inverts the concept of systemic racism.


3 "Neo-Nazi" a interesting choice of word since it seems he does not like technocracy, and I saw no mention of socialism; if anything, he attacked that.




Systemic racism is real but I won't try to convince you because I suspect that's a lost cause



Feel free to use logic and evidence to prove it then. I have already argued that you can't, but I also pointed out that it's used only by people who are racist towards whites

I see you, racist fistyboy, for what you are.



LGBTQ is not a destructive lifestyle


Firstly, Using the United States as an example, where 63% of the population identifies as Christian, a religion that is incompatible with LGBTQ lifestyles, explain how it isnt destructive for the society its a polarizing area thus sequentially harmful to said society at large. Secondly, explain how the suicide rates a derivative of the aforementioned umbrella, and as well please clarify how this is not inherently an observed factual destructive behavior.

IoT refers to everyday devices connected to each other, like how you connect your phone to your front door, oven, or lights. It's as technocratic as a remote control


excerpt of the source i provided "Smart government has been envisioned as an adaptive evolution of e-government, in response to rapid digital technological change, to innovate the ways the government can achieve better citizen engagement, accountability, and interoperability"

Ironically, it seems you're committing a sunk cost fallacy at the moment, trying to double down on your ignorance of IoT and how it was utilized in the video.

"how it was utilized in the video." context matters in philosophy.

"meaning P ", "knowing that P ", "having a reason to A ", and possibly even "being true" or "being right" only have meaning relative to a specified context. It should be self-explanatory, by the way.

Capgros [2088627]

If you post videos that use Neonazi arguments..If it walks like a duck....

Also YouTube videos are not necessarily truth, statistics can be easily made up, or taken completely out of context. You are too dumb to see this.

broleaf [3140943]

the boy who cried nazi nazi





"Neo-Nazi" a interesting choice of word since it seems he does not like technocracy, and I saw no mention of socialism; if anything, he attacked that.

I've already countered that attempt, but feel free to formulate an opposition counter.

Helpful suggestion.

You might want to look up the definition of what a Nazi is, then refrain from calling him that and instead reduce him to a racist, albeit even so, you'd struggle with that. Because then we could paint every woke person of color as a racist who utilizes systemic racism theory using synonymous logic in the context he brought up matters regarding whites.

Awesomepork101 [2478854]

You’re still watching louder with domestic abuser crowder?

broleaf [3140943]

Social responsibility to accept refugees is one thing, but you are painting all migrants with the same bigoted brush. The video goes on to talk about how these migrants are less competent than white Americans(note not Americans in general). Yeah, neo-nazi written all over it.


1 Rationally, in a contemporary context, explain why we should morally accept refugees due to some sort of social responsibility.


Or is it just a "muh feels" feelings and a lack thereof of logic? I already presented sources saying it's harmful.

2 The video utilizes statistics; I'm sorry, but the truth and reality don't fit your narrative. Furthermore, it showcases America's white population and how, despite the vast majority being white, they are a minority in the accepted hires in many corporations and government positions. If anything, it highlights anti-white racism occurring. Ironically, it inverts the concept of systemic racism.


3 "Neo-Nazi" a interesting choice of word since it seems he does not like technocracy, and I saw no mention of socialism; if anything, he attacked that.




Systemic racism is real but I won't try to convince you because I suspect that's a lost cause



Feel free to use logic and evidence to prove it then. I have already argued that you can't, but I also pointed out that it's used only by people who are racist towards whites

I see you, racist fistyboy, for what you are.



LGBTQ is not a destructive lifestyle


Firstly, Using the United States as an example, where 63% of the population identifies as Christian, a religion that is incompatible with LGBTQ lifestyles, explain how it isnt destructive for the society its a polarizing area thus sequentially harmful to said society at large. Secondly, explain how the suicide rates a derivative of the aforementioned umbrella, and as well please clarify how this is not inherently an observed factual destructive behavior.

IoT refers to everyday devices connected to each other, like how you connect your phone to your front door, oven, or lights. It's as technocratic as a remote control


excerpt of the source i provided "Smart government has been envisioned as an adaptive evolution of e-government, in response to rapid digital technological change, to innovate the ways the government can achieve better citizen engagement, accountability, and interoperability"

Ironically, it seems you're committing a sunk cost fallacy at the moment, trying to double down on your ignorance of IoT and how it was utilized in the video.

"how it was utilized in the video." context matters in philosophy.

"meaning P ", "knowing that P ", "having a reason to A ", and possibly even "being true" or "being right" only have meaning relative to a specified context. It should be self-explanatory, by the way.

Show post

Capgros [2088627]

If you post videos that use Neonazi arguments..If it walks like a duck....

Also YouTube videos are not necessarily truth, statistics can be easily made up, or taken completely out of context. You are too dumb to see this.

broleaf [3140943]

the boy who cried nazi nazi





"Neo-Nazi" a interesting choice of word since it seems he does not like technocracy, and I saw no mention of socialism; if anything, he attacked that.

I've already countered that attempt, but feel free to formulate an opposition counter.

Helpful suggestion.

You might want to look up the definition of what a Nazi is, then refrain from calling him that and instead reduce him to a racist, albeit even so, you'd struggle with that. Because then we could paint every woke person of color as a racist who utilizes systemic racism theory using synonymous logic in the context he brought up matters regarding whites.

Capgros [2088627]

I get it why you are trying to rebrand, but you are still too obvious.

broleaf [3140943]

Expand on that then. Why are you incapable of formulating an argument instead of making mere statements?

Capgros [2088627]

You obviously got my message, but pretend it's not clear.

Capgros [2088627]

If you post videos that use Neonazi arguments..If it walks like a duck....

Also YouTube videos are not necessarily truth, statistics can be easily made up, or taken completely out of context. You are too dumb to see this.

Show post

broleaf [3140943]

the boy who cried nazi nazi





"Neo-Nazi" a interesting choice of word since it seems he does not like technocracy, and I saw no mention of socialism; if anything, he attacked that.

I've already countered that attempt, but feel free to formulate an opposition counter.

Helpful suggestion.

You might want to look up the definition of what a Nazi is, then refrain from calling him that and instead reduce him to a racist, albeit even so, you'd struggle with that. Because then we could paint every woke person of color as a racist who utilizes systemic racism theory using synonymous logic in the context he brought up matters regarding whites.

Capgros [2088627]

I get it why you are trying to rebrand, but you are still too obvious.

broleaf [3140943]

Expand on that then. Why are you incapable of formulating an argument instead of making mere statements?

Capgros [2088627]

You obviously got my message, but pretend it's not clear.

Collete [1389080]

It's true that Hitler said this in 1928. The original quote was slightly longer than what has appeared in memes. At the same time, history showed that Hitler's National Socialist Movement later sought to destroy Christianity once in power. Citing evidence from the Nuremberg war-crime trials, The New York Times reported that, "the Nazis simply lied and made deals with the churches while planning a 'slow and cautious policy of gradual encroachment' to eliminate Christianity."

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/hitler-our-movement-is-christian/