Awesomepork101 [2478854]

What you are is a pretentious pseudo intellectual who hides behind grandiose statements and patronising gesticulating at the world at whole to pretend that you’re somehow relevant as a unified political entity.


You mix this with Christian supremacy and a smugness that proves that you clearly loved the crusades, think atheism is a disease, and no doubt envision a return to “traditionalism” to solve the world’s problems. Rather; you would elevate them

Collete [1389080]

Awesomepork101 [2478854]

What you are is a pretentious pseudo intellectual who hides behind grandiose statements and patronising gesticulating at the world at whole to pretend that you’re somehow relevant as a unified political entity.


You mix this with Christian supremacy and a smugness that proves that you clearly loved the crusades, think atheism is a disease, and no doubt envision a return to “traditionalism” to solve the world’s problems. Rather; you would elevate them

broleaf [3140943]

What you are is a pretentious pseudo intellectual who hides behind grandiose statements and patronising gesticulating at the world at whole to pretend that you’re somehow relevant as a unified political entity.

The best person I've encountered since I began occupying these forums in regards to the grasp of the English language. Sadly, half of what was said constitutes a utilization of ad hominem attacks.

You mix this with Christian supremacy and a smugness that proves that you clearly loved the crusades, think atheism is a disease, and no doubt envision a return to “traditionalism” to solve the world’s problems. Rather; you would elevate them

The funny thing I pointed out earlier, which went over Soylentwullf's head, is that he said, "I think freedom is the issue." This is false; it's rather the lack of a moral foundation. This is why communists suggested an attack vector of demoralizing democratic societies. I do, however, look down on atheists, likening them to animals, albeit truth. They are akin to creatures chasing whatever whim the Enlightenment throws at them, with no compass—purely primal in nature. Hedonistic, materialistic, thus, we apply cynical models to them. They are also magnificently easy to manipulate and brainwash due to their lack of moral principles thus, sequential character. We view them as useful idiots to pave the way for us via their intrinsic nature of atomizing. Therefore, they are easy to divide & conquer and then be reframed in a choosing image, like blank slate NPC drones, yes we exploit your atheism.

Why do you think China wiped out its own religions? Perhaps Taoism and Buddhism were deemed ineffective as vehicles of control, in contrast to Christianity and its siblings Islam and Judaism, due to their intrinsic nature of patriarchal submission.

What I think does not matter; however, what matters is that the movement as a whole continues to grow, winning more elections, etc. Thus, today is celebratory—Geert Wilders is now a kingmaker in the Netherlands. Next up, AFD and Le Pen. Getting all those chess pieces on the board is what counts if you plan to play for keeps. :)

Lastly, no, we are not a unified movement; it's more like a broad umbrella. My sect has been referenced as the theoretical branch of said umbrella, representing its brains and upper-class bridge. But rest assured, despite the few differences we may have, we are by far more interested in winning.

think of us akin to the concept of power a emerging intelligence.

Faether [2732904]

We're witnessing the rise of fascism, capitalism in decay.

Show post

broleaf [3140943]

Decay? This is the transformative process to its next evolution. You are witnessing the birth of far-right technocracy across Europe, as the rich capitalist class teams up with far-right radicals.
Human rights do not exist.
The Dark Enlightenment is now rising; we are in the era of liberalism in decay.

Steppenwulf [2960257]

You can try to associate your movement with the right all you want... the bottom line is the future government you envisage is no different from communist totalitarianism.

broleaf [3140943]

We're not center-right, correct. That would indicate we are for maintaining the status quo. We are neo-traditional, a fusion of both.


We are all liberals in the sense of being born in the modern zeitgeist including yourself
You could argue that we, as neo-traditionalists, were born as a byproduct of liberal democracy. We are its mutant offspring, created from the Enlightenment as its ying to yang.

Until the societal moral anchor is restored, it will purity spiral off. Activate technocracy.gov.exe, hit run. Sequentially, Activate Christian.exe, hit run.

Steppenwulf [2960257]

Oh, the modern zeitgeist... wow. The only problem is that you have no ability to raise factual support for your viewpoint. Even the founder of your movement cannot communicate on more than a "conversational" level. Your movement needs a genuine intellectual to develop it's tenets without resorting to the sort of vagaries and pseudo-intellectual nothing-isms you have thus far presented. If you love monarchy, move to Britain. My people have spilt far too much blood to end archaic monarchy in order to build a nation that recognizes the equality of all men rather than abiding arbitrary classism, to allow some new monarchist movement to take root.

You could argue that we, as neo-traditionalists, were born as a byproduct of liberal democracy.

No, you are reactionaries to the deterioration of Republican forms of governance caused by the communist infiltration of an otherwise free society. You blame freedom or "democracy" for the success of communism, and you believe that the only solution is to abandon self-governance entirely and return to system of autocratic rule. Unfortunately, this is exactly according to the earliest known aims of communism (defined in Karl Marx's "The Communist Manifesto" as well as in other prominent communist writings) have been, and what the ultimate result of communism is and always will be.

Monarchies may have 1 benevolent ruler followed by 15 tyrants. As for your technocracy, it's influence is already well enough evident in the evils of the US response to Covid-19.

If you want to live under a totalitarian regime, move to North Korea. And China is quickly following in their footsteps; you could go there and assist Xi in tightening his grasp on the most populace country in the world.

As for the USA, know that we're well armed and deeply committed to the cause of freedom. And as for Canada... I'm sorry to see her slipping into totalitarianism under her present regime. I hope she will come to her senses.

broleaf [3140943]

"our founder" or rather the father of our school of thought.
Born 4 December 1795
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Carlyle

Stephen_Lynx [2869110]

He is not far right, this is just yet another smear attempt from the left, that attacks everyone that is not an authoritarian leftist.

Capgros [2088627]

He is pretty far right in terms of racism.

Capgros [2088627]

He is pretty far right in terms of racism.

Stephen_Lynx [2869110]

Why is he racist?

Capgros [2088627]

Guess your research wasn't very deep on him lol, stupid question, next.

Edit, he is even convicted for racism

"On 9 December 2016, the District Court of The Hague convicted Dutch politician Geert Wilders for statements that he made on 19 March 2014 during a televised speech. On this date, Wilders asked his audience during a public meeting whether they wanted more or fewer Moroccans. In response, the audience cheered “Fewer! Fewer! Fewer!” numerous times. Wilders then said: “Well, then we are going to take care of that.” Both Wilders’ statements and the cheering of the audience were recorded and broadcast by the Dutch public broadcaster NOS.

If you don't think that is racist, it's a you problem

Capgros [2088627]

Guess your research wasn't very deep on him lol, stupid question, next.

Edit, he is even convicted for racism

"On 9 December 2016, the District Court of The Hague convicted Dutch politician Geert Wilders for statements that he made on 19 March 2014 during a televised speech. On this date, Wilders asked his audience during a public meeting whether they wanted more or fewer Moroccans. In response, the audience cheered “Fewer! Fewer! Fewer!” numerous times. Wilders then said: “Well, then we are going to take care of that.” Both Wilders’ statements and the cheering of the audience were recorded and broadcast by the Dutch public broadcaster NOS.

If you don't think that is racist, it's a you problem

Stephen_Lynx [2869110]

If you can't base your claim, I'll assume it's just made up bullshit.

Capgros [2088627]

Guess your research wasn't very deep on him lol, stupid question, next.

Edit, he is even convicted for racism

"On 9 December 2016, the District Court of The Hague convicted Dutch politician Geert Wilders for statements that he made on 19 March 2014 during a televised speech. On this date, Wilders asked his audience during a public meeting whether they wanted more or fewer Moroccans. In response, the audience cheered “Fewer! Fewer! Fewer!” numerous times. Wilders then said: “Well, then we are going to take care of that.” Both Wilders’ statements and the cheering of the audience were recorded and broadcast by the Dutch public broadcaster NOS.

If you don't think that is racist, it's a you problem

Stephen_Lynx [2869110]

If you can't base your claim, I'll assume it's just made up bullshit.

Capgros [2088627]

Again:

"On 9 December 2016, the District Court of The Hague convicted Dutch politician Geert Wilders for statements that he made on 19 March 2014 during a televised speech. On this date, Wilders asked his audience during a public meeting whether they wanted more or fewer Moroccans. In response, the audience cheered “Fewer! Fewer! Fewer!” numerous times. Wilders then said: “Well, then we are going to take care of that.” Both Wilders’ statements and the cheering of the audience were recorded and broadcast by the Dutch public broadcaster NOS."

Capgros [2088627]

Guess your research wasn't very deep on him lol, stupid question, next.

Edit, he is even convicted for racism

"On 9 December 2016, the District Court of The Hague convicted Dutch politician Geert Wilders for statements that he made on 19 March 2014 during a televised speech. On this date, Wilders asked his audience during a public meeting whether they wanted more or fewer Moroccans. In response, the audience cheered “Fewer! Fewer! Fewer!” numerous times. Wilders then said: “Well, then we are going to take care of that.” Both Wilders’ statements and the cheering of the audience were recorded and broadcast by the Dutch public broadcaster NOS.

If you don't think that is racist, it's a you problem

Stephen_Lynx [2869110]

If you can't base your claim, I'll assume it's just made up bullshit.

Capgros [2088627]

Again:

"On 9 December 2016, the District Court of The Hague convicted Dutch politician Geert Wilders for statements that he made on 19 March 2014 during a televised speech. On this date, Wilders asked his audience during a public meeting whether they wanted more or fewer Moroccans. In response, the audience cheered “Fewer! Fewer! Fewer!” numerous times. Wilders then said: “Well, then we are going to take care of that.” Both Wilders’ statements and the cheering of the audience were recorded and broadcast by the Dutch public broadcaster NOS."

broleaf [3140943]

Someone doesn't like democracy ;)

Capgros [2088627]

Guess your research wasn't very deep on him lol, stupid question, next.

Edit, he is even convicted for racism

"On 9 December 2016, the District Court of The Hague convicted Dutch politician Geert Wilders for statements that he made on 19 March 2014 during a televised speech. On this date, Wilders asked his audience during a public meeting whether they wanted more or fewer Moroccans. In response, the audience cheered “Fewer! Fewer! Fewer!” numerous times. Wilders then said: “Well, then we are going to take care of that.” Both Wilders’ statements and the cheering of the audience were recorded and broadcast by the Dutch public broadcaster NOS.

If you don't think that is racist, it's a you problem

Stephen_Lynx [2869110]

If you can't base your claim, I'll assume it's just made up bullshit.

Bhappychap [2270497]

He literally based his claim...it sounds like you've made up your mind and refuse to actually debate or learn. If you enter a forum or debate and are unwilling to change your stance, we have a word for that....

Faether [2732904]

We're witnessing the rise of fascism, capitalism in decay.

broleaf [3140943]

Decay? This is the transformative process to its next evolution. You are witnessing the birth of far-right technocracy across Europe, as the rich capitalist class teams up with far-right radicals.
Human rights do not exist.
The Dark Enlightenment is now rising; we are in the era of liberalism in decay.

windyrockbell [2805009]

God imagine if you were alive when Reagan was elected.You would have had to get your pants dry cleaned

broleaf [3140943]

I liked Reagan.