Rittenhouse Anniversary - Page 5 | Politics & Law | TORN
Rittenhouse Anniversary
    • Astolfo [2769295]
    • Role: Civilian
    • Level: 34
    • Posts: 442
    • Karma: 646
    • Last Action: 3 hours
      • 0
    • Reason:
      Are you sure you want to report this post to staff?
      Cancel
    Posted on 16:26:51 - 21/11/23 (4 months ago)
    Post link copied to clipboard Copy post link
    Seeing my name on the pedo list, tells me Sporky saw my response, didn't have a comeback for it, and went on doing with rightoids do best. Misrepresent, and hope no reads the responses and corrections.
    • SporkMonkey [2065017]
    • Role: Civilian
    • Level: 100
    • Posts: 15,232
    • Karma: 44,792
    • Last Action: 43 minutes
      • 0
    • Reason:
      Are you sure you want to report this post to staff?
      Cancel
    Posted on 16:31:16 - 21/11/23 (4 months ago)
    Post link copied to clipboard Copy post link

    Astolfo [2769295]

    Seeing my name on the pedo list, tells me Sporky saw my response, didn't have a comeback for it, and went on doing with rightoids do best. Misrepresent, and hope no reads the responses and corrections.
    1. It's not a list of pedos. Weird you'd read it that way. It is a list of people that don't care that one man was found innocent while another convicted pedo was dealt with.

    2. Your response was idiotic and not worth the time to respond to. Not my fault you're a retard.
    • SporkMonkey [2065017]
    • Role: Civilian
    • Level: 100
    • Posts: 15,232
    • Karma: 44,792
    • Last Action: 43 minutes
      • 0
    • Reason:
      Are you sure you want to report this post to staff?
      Cancel
    Posted on 16:33:09 - 21/11/23 (4 months ago)
    Post link copied to clipboard Copy post link

    Bhappychap [2270497]

    Wow, aren't you black? and you support rittenhouse?

    lol. You know you can't be part of that group, right? Duke doesn't allow it.


    And if this kid is a "hero" in your eyes, please get a vasectomy. For the sake of everyone. But especially those closest to you.

    EddieLee706 [1591144]

    Who's supposed to be black?

    Please indulge me

    Bhappychap [2270497]

    I thought Spork was, or claimed. But I don't know anymore, everyone changes their name or such.
    What does skin color have to do with anything?

    Rittenhouse, a white guy, dealt with two other white guys.

    You don't still believe the 100% proven false info that he shot a black dude, do you?

    You do, don't you?! How embarrassing for you.
    • Astolfo [2769295]
    • Role: Civilian
    • Level: 34
    • Posts: 442
    • Karma: 646
    • Last Action: 3 hours
      • 0
    • Reason:
      Are you sure you want to report this post to staff?
      Cancel
    Posted on 16:33:48 - 21/11/23 (4 months ago)
    Post link copied to clipboard Copy post link

    Astolfo [2769295]

    Seeing my name on the pedo list, tells me Sporky saw my response, didn't have a comeback for it, and went on doing with rightoids do best. Misrepresent, and hope no reads the responses and corrections.

    SporkMonkey [2065017]

    1. It's not a list of pedos. Weird you'd read it that way. It is a list of people that don't care that one man was found innocent while another convicted pedo was dealt with.

    2. Your response was idiotic and not worth the time to respond to. Not my fault you're a retard.
    Torn should add a new game in the casino, where you have to shoot a random guy. If he's happens to have CP on his computer you win the jackpot, if he doesn't you go to jail. Call it 'Ritten Roulette'.
    Last edited by Astolfo on 16:35:43 - 21/11/23
    • SporkMonkey [2065017]
    • Role: Civilian
    • Level: 100
    • Posts: 15,232
    • Karma: 44,792
    • Last Action: 43 minutes
      • 0
    • Reason:
      Are you sure you want to report this post to staff?
      Cancel
    Posted on 16:39:01 - 21/11/23 (4 months ago)
    Post link copied to clipboard Copy post link

    Astolfo [2769295]

    Seeing my name on the pedo list, tells me Sporky saw my response, didn't have a comeback for it, and went on doing with rightoids do best. Misrepresent, and hope no reads the responses and corrections.

    SporkMonkey [2065017]

    1. It's not a list of pedos. Weird you'd read it that way. It is a list of people that don't care that one man was found innocent while another convicted pedo was dealt with.

    2. Your response was idiotic and not worth the time to respond to. Not my fault you're a retard.

    Astolfo [2769295]

    Torn should add a new game in the casino, where you have to shoot a random guy. If he's happens to have CP on his computer you win the jackpot, if he doesn't you go to jail. Call it 'Ritten Roulette'.
    Way to downplay the action of the aggressor. He anally ****d little boys. His no longer being on this planet is a bonus to Rittenhouse purely defending himself from an unwarranted attack.
    • Odin-All-Father [2010524]
    • Role: Civilian
    • Level: 93
    • Posts: 7,827
    • Karma: 12,880
    • Last Action: 7 minutes
      • 0
    • Reason:
      Are you sure you want to report this post to staff?
      Cancel
    Posted on 16:54:16 - 21/11/23 (4 months ago)
    Post link copied to clipboard Copy post link
    Again, comical that there are morons in here hating on someone who done the world a favour whilst defending his own life from aggressors.

    b16a796e-d0d2-4aec-9b7e-6d1a32769e79-2010524.gif?v=1040063

    • Astolfo [2769295]
    • Role: Civilian
    • Level: 34
    • Posts: 442
    • Karma: 646
    • Last Action: 3 hours
      • 0
    • Reason:
      Are you sure you want to report this post to staff?
      Cancel
    Posted on 17:22:48 - 21/11/23 (4 months ago)
    Post link copied to clipboard Copy post link

    Odin-All-Father [2010524]

    Again, comical that there are morons in here hating on someone who done the world a favour whilst defending his own life from aggressors.
    Honestly, I always saw this as a sad unfortunate event. I don't hate the kid, he was clearly just some autistic kid, doing what he thought was right. Sadly this meant showing up to a protest with a gun. When the aggression started he did only try to defend himself, then people considered him an active shooter and tried to play heroes, only causing more casualties.

    I honestly don't know much about the pedo thing, I doesn't seem important to the case. If Rittenhouse got a lucky shot and deleted a piece of shit from earth, good, didn't affect anyone's actions in that moment though.

    My stance is, don't bring guns to a protest (goes for both sides), and Rittenhouse wasn't a hero, he was a scared kid who should never have been put in that situation.
    • Stephen_Lynx [2869110]
    • Role: Civilian
    • Level: 50
    • Posts: 981
    • Karma: 1,603
    • Last Action: 4 hours
      • 0
    • Reason:
      Are you sure you want to report this post to staff?
      Cancel
    Posted on 17:58:39 - 21/11/23 (4 months ago)
    Post link copied to clipboard Copy post link
    • A707 [2600371]
    • Role: Civilian
    • Level: 29
    • Posts: 195
    • Karma: 22
    • Last Action: 5 minutes
      • 0
    • Reason:
      Are you sure you want to report this post to staff?
      Cancel
    Posted on 19:09:44 - 21/11/23 (4 months ago)
    Post link copied to clipboard Copy post link

    Astolfo [2769295]

    Seeing my name on the pedo list, tells me Sporky saw my response, didn't have a comeback for it, and went on doing with rightoids do best. Misrepresent, and hope no reads the responses and corrections.
    According to spork anyone who doesn't agree with him supports pedophilia.
    • A707 [2600371]
    • Role: Civilian
    • Level: 29
    • Posts: 195
    • Karma: 22
    • Last Action: 5 minutes
      • 0
    • Reason:
      Are you sure you want to report this post to staff?
      Cancel
    Posted on 19:18:03 - 21/11/23 (4 months ago)
    Post link copied to clipboard Copy post link

    A707 [2600371]

    I did make up my mind. In the eyes of the law he did nothing wrong but in my eyes that man went out there to intimidate people and infringe their rights and came back with blood on his hands

    SporkMonkey [2065017]

    So you're only for constitutional Rights when it's convenient for your POV.

    Got it.

    A707 [2600371]

    Oh, I ain't for constitutional rights, I just thought you were

    Madgod [1733719]

    You don't think a country should have a charter of rights at all?

    A707 [2600371]

    No, I just don't think that this 300 year old document should be held so highly, especially considering that some of the people that wrote it were the scum of the earth.

    Thomas jefferson ****d his underage female slave, you do know?

    Madgod [1733719]

    Show me concrete proof that this happened. But that's awful if it did.

    So just to confirm... you don't think people should have freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of assembly, and the right to petition the government, nor the right too keep and bear arms, nor protection against unlawful search and seizure, nor any protections for due process, or the right to a jury, or any rules against excessive fines, nor any federal laws against slavery, or gender voting rights, or limits on presidentail terms, or the condition of rights upon payment of taxes, or anything else?
    I am in favour of the rights set forth at the un, in which most of those that you mentioned are detailed by people who didn't own slaves or commit crimes against humanity. Also, they weren't so nonsensical to put this "right to keep and bear arms" in there considering the problems with violence in your country. They also didn't ban alcohol, which your country did, Where's the "liberty" in that?
    • A707 [2600371]
    • Role: Civilian
    • Level: 29
    • Posts: 195
    • Karma: 22
    • Last Action: 5 minutes
      • 0
    • Reason:
      Are you sure you want to report this post to staff?
      Cancel
    Posted on 19:26:12 - 21/11/23 (4 months ago)
    Post link copied to clipboard Copy post link

    A707 [2600371]

    I did make up my mind. In the eyes of the law he did nothing wrong but in my eyes that man went out there to intimidate people and infringe their rights and came back with blood on his hands

    SporkMonkey [2065017]

    So you're only for constitutional Rights when it's convenient for your POV.

    Got it.

    A707 [2600371]

    Oh, I ain't for constitutional rights, I just thought you were

    Madgod [1733719]

    You don't think a country should have a charter of rights at all?

    A707 [2600371]

    No, I just don't think that this 300 year old document should be held so highly, especially considering that some of the people that wrote it were the scum of the earth.

    Thomas jefferson ****d his underage female slave, you do know?

    Madgod [1733719]

    Show me concrete proof that this happened. But that's awful if it did.

    So just to confirm... you don't think people should have freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of assembly, and the right to petition the government, nor the right too keep and bear arms, nor protection against unlawful search and seizure, nor any protections for due process, or the right to a jury, or any rules against excessive fines, nor any federal laws against slavery, or gender voting rights, or limits on presidentail terms, or the condition of rights upon payment of taxes, or anything else?
    https://www.monticello.org/sallyhemings/

    For context:
    This is from the charity that runs the museum on the plantation that Thomas Jefferson used to own.
    Sally Hemmings was a slave girl who bore children to Jefferson
    Hemmings couldn't reasonably give consent as she was a slave AND underage.

    This guy wrote parts of the constitution and was a real scumbag. Most of the founding fathers were criminal in other ways but he is by far the worst offender.
    • Madgod [1733719]
    • Role: Civilian
    • Level: 64
    • Posts: 2,325
    • Karma: 1,008
    • Last Action: 7 hours
      • 0
    • Reason:
      Are you sure you want to report this post to staff?
      Cancel
    Posted on 19:40:06 - 21/11/23 (4 months ago)
    Post link copied to clipboard Copy post link

    SporkMonkey [2065017]

    So you're only for constitutional Rights when it's convenient for your POV.

    Got it.

    A707 [2600371]

    Oh, I ain't for constitutional rights, I just thought you were

    Madgod [1733719]

    You don't think a country should have a charter of rights at all?

    A707 [2600371]

    No, I just don't think that this 300 year old document should be held so highly, especially considering that some of the people that wrote it were the scum of the earth.

    Thomas jefferson ****d his underage female slave, you do know?

    Madgod [1733719]

    Show me concrete proof that this happened. But that's awful if it did.

    So just to confirm... you don't think people should have freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of assembly, and the right to petition the government, nor the right too keep and bear arms, nor protection against unlawful search and seizure, nor any protections for due process, or the right to a jury, or any rules against excessive fines, nor any federal laws against slavery, or gender voting rights, or limits on presidentail terms, or the condition of rights upon payment of taxes, or anything else?

    A707 [2600371]

    I am in favour of the rights set forth at the un, in which most of those that you mentioned are detailed by people who didn't own slaves or commit crimes against humanity. Also, they weren't so nonsensical to put this "right to keep and bear arms" in there considering the problems with violence in your country. They also didn't ban alcohol, which your country did, Where's the "liberty" in that?
    This post confused me

    in which most of those that you mentioned are detailed by people who didn't own slaves or commit crimes against humanity
    Those at the UN?

    Also, they weren't so nonsensical to put this "right to keep and bear arms" in there considering the problems with violence in your country
    So you're in favor of the second amendment?

    They also didn't ban alcohol, which your country did, Where's the "liberty" in that?

    Well, I'm assuming that you think I live in the US, but I live in Canada. However, both countries banned alcohol around the end of WW1. As did Russia, Iceland, Norway, Finland, Sweden, Australia, New Zealand, Greenland, Estonia, Hungary, and Parts of India. There are actually some interesting theories surrounding this. One of them being that with the men off fighting the war, it was the women of these countries which voted in prohibition.

    Exercising your right to vote is an act of collective liberty. Should a country have the right to vote to ban something? If a country is prohibited by federal law on holding votes to ban things like alcohol, is this too an act of liberty?

    Regarding Sally Hemmings, based on what I've looked into it does seem that there is a DNA link between Thomas Jefferson and her descendants. She had her first kid when she was 17, and at the time Thomas Jefferson would have been 46-47. Now, by today's standards this is seen as disgusting, and yes it would constitute statutory ****. But was this unusual for the time? Not at all. According to Google, the age of consent was only 12, and this was in part due to the life expectancy of the day. No one back then would have cast a second glance at their relationship.

    Same too with Slavery. This was the global norm back then. In fact, the only regard in which the Atlantic Slave Trade differed from the rest of the world, is they didn't practice forced sterilization of their slaves (which is why we have descendants of the Atlantic Slave Trade today, but the same couldn't be said as much for the Arab Slave Trade).

    I'm not condoning it, and I find the whole dynamic disgusting, but I also know if I grew up back then, it would have been perceived by everyone as normal. I think it's a little silly to attack people that lived hundreds of years ago for simply conforming to the zeitgeist of the time. Would you want our descendants 300 years from now, with their unimaginably different set of norms, to cast judgement on us through their modern lenses? Or would you prefer that they look at our actions through the lens of our time and to judge our actions comparatively to those around us in our own time?

    Probably drunk and trolling

    • A707 [2600371]
    • Role: Civilian
    • Level: 29
    • Posts: 195
    • Karma: 22
    • Last Action: 5 minutes
      • 2
    • Reason:
      Are you sure you want to report this post to staff?
      Cancel
    Posted on 19:44:05 - 21/11/23 (4 months ago)
    Post link copied to clipboard Copy post link

    A707 [2600371]

    Oh, I ain't for constitutional rights, I just thought you were

    Madgod [1733719]

    You don't think a country should have a charter of rights at all?

    A707 [2600371]

    No, I just don't think that this 300 year old document should be held so highly, especially considering that some of the people that wrote it were the scum of the earth.

    Thomas jefferson ****d his underage female slave, you do know?

    Madgod [1733719]

    Show me concrete proof that this happened. But that's awful if it did.

    So just to confirm... you don't think people should have freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of assembly, and the right to petition the government, nor the right too keep and bear arms, nor protection against unlawful search and seizure, nor any protections for due process, or the right to a jury, or any rules against excessive fines, nor any federal laws against slavery, or gender voting rights, or limits on presidentail terms, or the condition of rights upon payment of taxes, or anything else?

    A707 [2600371]

    I am in favour of the rights set forth at the un, in which most of those that you mentioned are detailed by people who didn't own slaves or commit crimes against humanity. Also, they weren't so nonsensical to put this "right to keep and bear arms" in there considering the problems with violence in your country. They also didn't ban alcohol, which your country did, Where's the "liberty" in that?

    Madgod [1733719]

    This post confused me

    in which most of those that you mentioned are detailed by people who didn't own slaves or commit crimes against humanity
    Those at the UN?

    Also, they weren't so nonsensical to put this "right to keep and bear arms" in there considering the problems with violence in your country
    So you're in favor of the second amendment?

    They also didn't ban alcohol, which your country did, Where's the "liberty" in that?

    Well, I'm assuming that you think I live in the US, but I live in Canada. However, both countries banned alcohol around the end of WW1. As did Russia, Iceland, Norway, Finland, Sweden, Australia, New Zealand, Greenland, Estonia, Hungary, and Parts of India. There are actually some interesting theories surrounding this. One of them being that with the men off fighting the war, it was the women of these countries which voted in prohibition.

    Exercising your right to vote is an act of collective liberty. Should a country have the right to vote to ban something? If a country is prohibited by federal law on holding votes to ban things like alcohol, is this too an act of liberty?

    Regarding Sally Hemmings, based on what I've looked into it does seem that there is a DNA link between Thomas Jefferson and her descendants. She had her first kid when she was 17, and at the time Thomas Jefferson would have been 46-47. Now, by today's standards this is seen as disgusting, and yes it would constitute statutory ****. But was this unusual for the time? Not at all. According to Google, the age of consent was only 12, and this was in part due to the life expectancy of the day. No one back then would have cast a second glance at their relationship.

    Same too with Slavery. This was the global norm back then. In fact, the only regard in which the Atlantic Slave Trade differed from the rest of the world, is they didn't practice forced sterilization of their slaves (which is why we have descendants of the Atlantic Slave Trade today, but the same couldn't be said as much for the Arab Slave Trade).

    I'm not condoning it, and I find the whole dynamic disgusting, but I also know if I grew up back then, it would have been perceived by everyone as normal. I think it's a little silly to attack people that lived hundreds of years ago for simply conforming to the zeitgeist of the time. Would you want our descendants 300 years from now, with their unimaginably different set of norms, to cast judgement on us through their modern lenses? Or would you prefer that they look at our actions through the lens of our time and to judge our actions comparatively to those around us in our own time?
    I'm in favour of the second amendment for some countries outside of america but americans cannot be trusted
    Last edited by A707 on 19:44:51 - 21/11/23
    • Bhappychap [2270497]
    • Role: Civilian
    • Level: 62
    • Posts: 7,363
    • Karma: 5,535
    • Last Action: 10 hours
      • 1
    • Reason:
      Are you sure you want to report this post to staff?
      Cancel
    Posted on 20:33:36 - 21/11/23 (4 months ago)
    Post link copied to clipboard Copy post link

    Bhappychap [2270497]

    Wow, aren't you black? and you support rittenhouse?

    lol. You know you can't be part of that group, right? Duke doesn't allow it.


    And if this kid is a "hero" in your eyes, please get a vasectomy. For the sake of everyone. But especially those closest to you.

    EddieLee706 [1591144]

    Who's supposed to be black?

    Please indulge me

    Bhappychap [2270497]

    I thought Spork was, or claimed. But I don't know anymore, everyone changes their name or such.

    SporkMonkey [2065017]

    What does skin color have to do with anything?

    Rittenhouse, a white guy, dealt with two other white guys.

    You don't still believe the 100% proven false info that he shot a black dude, do you?

    You do, don't you?! How embarrassing for you.
    Rittenhouse has been photographed on several occasions giving the WS symbol. 

    Who he shot makes no difference to me. Glorifying someone who slipped through the cracks of the law, for slipping through the cracks is idiotic, at best.
    • A707 [2600371]
    • Role: Civilian
    • Level: 29
    • Posts: 195
    • Karma: 22
    • Last Action: 5 minutes
      • 2
    • Reason:
      Are you sure you want to report this post to staff?
      Cancel
    Posted on 20:47:44 - 21/11/23 (4 months ago)
    Post link copied to clipboard Copy post link

    Bhappychap [2270497]

    Wow, aren't you black? and you support rittenhouse?

    lol. You know you can't be part of that group, right? Duke doesn't allow it.


    And if this kid is a "hero" in your eyes, please get a vasectomy. For the sake of everyone. But especially those closest to you.

    EddieLee706 [1591144]

    Who's supposed to be black?

    Please indulge me

    Bhappychap [2270497]

    I thought Spork was, or claimed. But I don't know anymore, everyone changes their name or such.

    SporkMonkey [2065017]

    What does skin color have to do with anything?

    Rittenhouse, a white guy, dealt with two other white guys.

    You don't still believe the 100% proven false info that he shot a black dude, do you?

    You do, don't you?! How embarrassing for you.

    Bhappychap [2270497]

    Rittenhouse has been photographed on several occasions giving the WS symbol.

    Who he shot makes no difference to me. Glorifying someone who slipped through the cracks of the law, for slipping through the cracks is idiotic, at best.
    I just looked into it and it seems rittenhouse was also seen with the proud boys, a bunch of domestic terrorists. That was even a shock for me
    • EddieLee706 [1591144]
    • Role: Civilian
    • Level: 77
    • Posts: 2,480
    • Karma: 2,331
    • Last Action: 14 minutes
      • 1
    • Reason:
      Are you sure you want to report this post to staff?
      Cancel
    Posted on 21:34:53 - 21/11/23 (4 months ago)
    Post link copied to clipboard Copy post link

    Bhappychap [2270497]

    Wow, aren't you black? and you support rittenhouse?

    lol. You know you can't be part of that group, right? Duke doesn't allow it.


    And if this kid is a "hero" in your eyes, please get a vasectomy. For the sake of everyone. But especially those closest to you.

    EddieLee706 [1591144]

    Who's supposed to be black?

    Please indulge me

    Bhappychap [2270497]

    I thought Spork was, or claimed. But I don't know anymore, everyone changes their name or such.

    SporkMonkey [2065017]

    What does skin color have to do with anything?

    Rittenhouse, a white guy, dealt with two other white guys.

    You don't still believe the 100% proven false info that he shot a black dude, do you?

    You do, don't you?! How embarrassing for you.

    Bhappychap [2270497]

    Rittenhouse has been photographed on several occasions giving the WS symbol.

    Who he shot makes no difference to me. Glorifying someone who slipped through the cracks of the law, for slipping through the cracks is idiotic, at best.
    Let's keep it real he wasnt there to kill people that look like him. He wanted to get one for the culture. 

    It just so happened to turn out in a different way.
    • Capgros [2088627]
    • Role: Civilian
    • Level: 100
    • Posts: 10,286
    • Karma: 8,600
    • Last Action: 1 hour
      • 0
    • Reason:
      Are you sure you want to report this post to staff?
      Cancel
    Posted on 21:40:56 - 21/11/23 (4 months ago)
    Post link copied to clipboard Copy post link



    Beat on the brat
    Beat on the brat
    Beat on the brat with a baseball bat
    Oh yeah, oh yeah, uh-oh
    Beat on the brat
    Beat on the brat
    Beat on the brat with a baseball bat
    Oh yeah, oh yeah, uh-oh
    Oh yeah, oh yeah, uh-oh
    What can you do?
    What can you do?
    With a brat like that always on your back
    What can you lose?
    What can you do?
    What can you do?
    With a brat like that always on your back
    What can you lose, lose?
    Beat on the brat
    Beat on the brat
    Beat on the brat with a baseball bat
    Oh yeah, oh yeah, uh-oh
    Beat on the brat
    Beat on the brat
    Beat on the brat with a baseball bat
    Oh yeah, oh yeah, uh-oh
    Oh yeah, oh yeah, uh-oh
    What can you do?
    What can you do?
    With a brat like that always on your back
    What can you lose?
    What can you do?
    What can you do?
    With a brat like that always on your back
    What can you lose, lose?
    Last edited by Capgros on 21:49:01 - 21/11/23
    • broleaf [3140943]
    • Role: Civilian
    • Level: 16
    • Posts: 490
    • Karma: 67
    • Last Action: 4 months
      • 0
    • Reason:
      Are you sure you want to report this post to staff?
      Cancel
    Posted on 21:41:44 - 21/11/23 (4 months ago)
    Post link copied to clipboard Copy post link

    Bhappychap [2270497]

    Wow, aren't you black? and you support rittenhouse?

    lol. You know you can't be part of that group, right? Duke doesn't allow it.


    And if this kid is a "hero" in your eyes, please get a vasectomy. For the sake of everyone. But especially those closest to you.

    EddieLee706 [1591144]

    Who's supposed to be black?

    Please indulge me

    Bhappychap [2270497]

    I thought Spork was, or claimed. But I don't know anymore, everyone changes their name or such.

    SporkMonkey [2065017]

    What does skin color have to do with anything?

    Rittenhouse, a white guy, dealt with two other white guys.

    You don't still believe the 100% proven false info that he shot a black dude, do you?

    You do, don't you?! How embarrassing for you.
    Kyle, a white Hispanic, is specifically considered a based POC.

    js. kek

    I think that highlights the stupidity of trans-creatures contrast argument quite nicely.
    Last edited by broleaf on 15:21:34 - 22/11/23

    NRx. Reject Modernity return to: Tradition, Monarchy, Spirit.

    GENERAL-HUX-STARKILLER-BASE-SAR-WARS-THE-FORCE-AWAKENS-1.jpg

    • A707 [2600371]
    • Role: Civilian
    • Level: 29
    • Posts: 195
    • Karma: 22
    • Last Action: 5 minutes
      • 1
    • Reason:
      Are you sure you want to report this post to staff?
      Cancel
    Posted on 22:30:36 - 21/11/23 (4 months ago)
    Post link copied to clipboard Copy post link

    Capgros [2088627]




    Beat on the brat
    Beat on the brat
    Beat on the brat with a baseball bat
    Oh yeah, oh yeah, uh-oh
    Beat on the brat
    Beat on the brat
    Beat on the brat with a baseball bat
    Oh yeah, oh yeah, uh-oh
    Oh yeah, oh yeah, uh-oh
    What can you do?
    What can you do?
    With a brat like that always on your back
    What can you lose?
    What can you do?
    What can you do?
    With a brat like that always on your back
    What can you lose, lose?
    Beat on the brat
    Beat on the brat
    Beat on the brat with a baseball bat
    Oh yeah, oh yeah, uh-oh
    Beat on the brat
    Beat on the brat
    Beat on the brat with a baseball bat
    Oh yeah, oh yeah, uh-oh
    Oh yeah, oh yeah, uh-oh
    What can you do?
    What can you do?
    With a brat like that always on your back
    What can you lose?
    What can you do?
    What can you do?
    With a brat like that always on your back
    What can you lose, lose?
    Lol
    • A707 [2600371]
    • Role: Civilian
    • Level: 29
    • Posts: 195
    • Karma: 22
    • Last Action: 5 minutes
      • 1
    • Reason:
      Are you sure you want to report this post to staff?
      Cancel
    Posted on 22:33:49 - 21/11/23 (4 months ago)
    Post link copied to clipboard Copy post link

    Bhappychap [2270497]

    Wow, aren't you black? and you support rittenhouse?

    lol. You know you can't be part of that group, right? Duke doesn't allow it.


    And if this kid is a "hero" in your eyes, please get a vasectomy. For the sake of everyone. But especially those closest to you.

    EddieLee706 [1591144]

    Who's supposed to be black?

    Please indulge me

    Bhappychap [2270497]

    I thought Spork was, or claimed. But I don't know anymore, everyone changes their name or such.

    SporkMonkey [2065017]

    What does skin color have to do with anything?

    Rittenhouse, a white guy, dealt with two other white guys.

    You don't still believe the 100% proven false info that he shot a black dude, do you?

    You do, don't you?! How embarrassing for you.

    broleaf [3140943]

    Kyle, a white Hispanic, is specifically considered a based POC.

    js. kek

    I think that highlights the stupidity of trans-creatures contrast argument quite nicely.
    Evidence?
Reply
Thread Title: