Capgros [2088627]

Beat on the brat
Beat on the brat
Beat on the brat with a baseball bat
Oh yeah, oh yeah, uh-oh
Beat on the brat
Beat on the brat
Beat on the brat with a baseball bat
Oh yeah, oh yeah, uh-oh
Oh yeah, oh yeah, uh-oh
What can you do?
What can you do?
With a brat like that always on your back
What can you lose?
What can you do?
What can you do?
With a brat like that always on your back
What can you lose, lose?
Beat on the brat
Beat on the brat
Beat on the brat with a baseball bat
Oh yeah, oh yeah, uh-oh
Beat on the brat
Beat on the brat
Beat on the brat with a baseball bat
Oh yeah, oh yeah, uh-oh
Oh yeah, oh yeah, uh-oh
What can you do?
What can you do?
With a brat like that always on your back
What can you lose?
What can you do?
What can you do?
With a brat like that always on your back
What can you lose, lose?

Capgros [2088627]

Beat on the brat
Beat on the brat
Beat on the brat with a baseball bat
Oh yeah, oh yeah, uh-oh
Beat on the brat
Beat on the brat
Beat on the brat with a baseball bat
Oh yeah, oh yeah, uh-oh
Oh yeah, oh yeah, uh-oh
What can you do?
What can you do?
With a brat like that always on your back
What can you lose?
What can you do?
What can you do?
With a brat like that always on your back
What can you lose, lose?
Beat on the brat
Beat on the brat
Beat on the brat with a baseball bat
Oh yeah, oh yeah, uh-oh
Beat on the brat
Beat on the brat
Beat on the brat with a baseball bat
Oh yeah, oh yeah, uh-oh
Oh yeah, oh yeah, uh-oh
What can you do?
What can you do?
With a brat like that always on your back
What can you lose?
What can you do?
What can you do?
With a brat like that always on your back
What can you lose, lose?

Madgod [1733719]

Are you inciting violence?

A707 [2600371]

Your hero is a killer. That's the hero of the people that vote for the "law and order" party

Show post

SporkMonkey [2065017]

But a hero nonetheless. f**k the ShitLib Pedos.

A707 [2600371]

If your "hero" wasn't waving a gun around everyone involved would've still been alive

SporkMonkey [2065017]

By your logic, if the pedos hadn't aggressively attacked Kyle, they'd be alive today.

f**k em. The world is a better place.

But good to know you wish more diddlers were walking this planet.

A707 [2600371]

OK, fair enough.

But please tell me why your hero was attempting to intimidate people with weapons during a protest, which is their first amendment right.

SporkMonkey [2065017]

Why were the pedos trying to intimidate Kyle by attacking him with a skateboard, which is NOT protected by the 1A? They played FAFO and won with someone that was exercising their 2A Right.

Capgros [2088627]

Beat on the brat
Beat on the brat
Beat on the brat with a baseball bat
Oh yeah, oh yeah, uh-oh
Beat on the brat
Beat on the brat
Beat on the brat with a baseball bat
Oh yeah, oh yeah, uh-oh
Oh yeah, oh yeah, uh-oh
What can you do?
What can you do?
With a brat like that always on your back
What can you lose?
What can you do?
What can you do?
With a brat like that always on your back
What can you lose, lose?
Beat on the brat
Beat on the brat
Beat on the brat with a baseball bat
Oh yeah, oh yeah, uh-oh
Beat on the brat
Beat on the brat
Beat on the brat with a baseball bat
Oh yeah, oh yeah, uh-oh
Oh yeah, oh yeah, uh-oh
What can you do?
What can you do?
With a brat like that always on your back
What can you lose?
What can you do?
What can you do?
With a brat like that always on your back
What can you lose, lose?

Madgod [1733719]

Are you inciting violence?

Capgros [2088627]

Sorry, next time I go with an AR-15 to a explosive demonstration, and shoot up three people. Way more peaceful.

Better yet, I sent my 17 year old kid.

Capgros [2088627]

Beat on the brat
Beat on the brat
Beat on the brat with a baseball bat
Oh yeah, oh yeah, uh-oh
Beat on the brat
Beat on the brat
Beat on the brat with a baseball bat
Oh yeah, oh yeah, uh-oh
Oh yeah, oh yeah, uh-oh
What can you do?
What can you do?
With a brat like that always on your back
What can you lose?
What can you do?
What can you do?
With a brat like that always on your back
What can you lose, lose?
Beat on the brat
Beat on the brat
Beat on the brat with a baseball bat
Oh yeah, oh yeah, uh-oh
Beat on the brat
Beat on the brat
Beat on the brat with a baseball bat
Oh yeah, oh yeah, uh-oh
Oh yeah, oh yeah, uh-oh
What can you do?
What can you do?
With a brat like that always on your back
What can you lose?
What can you do?
What can you do?
With a brat like that always on your back
What can you lose, lose?

Madgod [1733719]

Are you inciting violence?

Capgros [2088627]

Sorry, next time I go with an AR-15 to a explosive demonstration, and shoot up three people. Way more peaceful.

Better yet, I sent my 17 year old kid.

Madgod [1733719]

shoot up three people in self defense*

I'm sure Kyle Rittenhouse wanted to be there regardless of whether or not his parents played a role.

I wasn't really being serious with my inciting violence comment by the way, unless of course you were calling for people to start taking bats to people with political opinions they disagree with

Capgros [2088627]

You don't get the point, he shouldn't have been there at all with an AR-15, every responsible parent knows that.

This thread is just masturbating on a kid that was in a situation that never should've happened, glorifying violence

Capgros [2088627]

You don't get the point, he shouldn't have been there at all with an AR-15, every responsible parent knows that.

This thread is just masturbating on a kid that was in a situation that never should've happened, glorifying violence

Odin-All-Father [2010524]

You don’t get the point, people shouldn’t have been out there attacking innocent people and burning/damaging innocent peoples property.

play stupid games win stupid prizes. No love lost for a ***** dying and other scumbags getting wounded, shouldn’t have attacked an innocent 17 year old.

Capgros [2088627]

You don't get the point, he shouldn't have been there at all with an AR-15, every responsible parent knows that.

This thread is just masturbating on a kid that was in a situation that never should've happened, glorifying violence

Odin-All-Father [2010524]

You don’t get the point, people shouldn’t have been out there attacking innocent people and burning/damaging innocent peoples property.

play stupid games win stupid prizes. No love lost for a ***** dying and other scumbags getting wounded, shouldn’t have attacked an innocent 17 year old.

Capgros [2088627]

If the second guy he killed, had a gun and killed Rittenhouse, it would have also been technically self defense, nothing to celebrate about it.

You people are so dumb, it isn't even funny. Fact is, he shouldn't have been there open carrying an AR-15, period, anybody claiming otherwise should never reproduce.

You can claim it's self defense, fine, but glorifying this, is inherently violent, and stupid

SporkMonkey [2065017]

But a hero nonetheless. f**k the ShitLib Pedos.

Show post

A707 [2600371]

If your "hero" wasn't waving a gun around everyone involved would've still been alive

SporkMonkey [2065017]

By your logic, if the pedos hadn't aggressively attacked Kyle, they'd be alive today.

f**k em. The world is a better place.

But good to know you wish more diddlers were walking this planet.

A707 [2600371]

OK, fair enough.

But please tell me why your hero was attempting to intimidate people with weapons during a protest, which is their first amendment right.

SporkMonkey [2065017]

Why were the pedos trying to intimidate Kyle by attacking him with a skateboard, which is NOT protected by the 1A? They played FAFO and won with someone that was exercising their 2A Right.

Drizzle [1607391]

They tried to subdue him after he had already shot someone and threatened another.

If there was "a good guy with a gun" Kyle would be dead.

A707 [2600371]

I did make up my mind. In the eyes of the law he did nothing wrong but in my eyes that man went out there to intimidate people and infringe their rights and came back with blood on his hands

Show post

SporkMonkey [2065017]

So you're only for constitutional Rights when it's convenient for your POV.

Got it.

A707 [2600371]

Oh, I ain't for constitutional rights, I just thought you were

Madgod [1733719]

You don't think a country should have a charter of rights at all?

A707 [2600371]

No, I just don't think that this 300 year old document should be held so highly, especially considering that some of the people that wrote it were the scum of the earth.

Thomas jefferson ****d his underage female slave, you do know?

EddieLee706 [1591144]

That doesn't matter.

The Constitution only applied to white men at the time.

A707 [2600371]

If your "hero" wasn't waving a gun around everyone involved would've still been alive

Show post

SporkMonkey [2065017]

By your logic, if the pedos hadn't aggressively attacked Kyle, they'd be alive today.

f**k em. The world is a better place.

But good to know you wish more diddlers were walking this planet.

A707 [2600371]

OK, fair enough.

But please tell me why your hero was attempting to intimidate people with weapons during a protest, which is their first amendment right.

SporkMonkey [2065017]

Why were the pedos trying to intimidate Kyle by attacking him with a skateboard, which is NOT protected by the 1A? They played FAFO and won with someone that was exercising their 2A Right.

Drizzle [1607391]

They tried to subdue him after he had already shot someone and threatened another.

If there was "a good guy with a gun" Kyle would be dead.

SporkMonkey [2065017]

If there wasn't a "good guy" with a gun, then Kyle would have been found guilty of taking out the pedo you so feverishly lament for.

But he was found innocent, therefore "good," despite your salt.

SporkMonkey [2065017]

By your logic, if the pedos hadn't aggressively attacked Kyle, they'd be alive today.

f**k em. The world is a better place.

But good to know you wish more diddlers were walking this planet.

Show post

A707 [2600371]

OK, fair enough.

But please tell me why your hero was attempting to intimidate people with weapons during a protest, which is their first amendment right.

SporkMonkey [2065017]

Why were the pedos trying to intimidate Kyle by attacking him with a skateboard, which is NOT protected by the 1A? They played FAFO and won with someone that was exercising their 2A Right.

Drizzle [1607391]

They tried to subdue him after he had already shot someone and threatened another.

If there was "a good guy with a gun" Kyle would be dead.

SporkMonkey [2065017]

If there wasn't a "good guy" with a gun, then Kyle would have been found guilty of taking out the pedo you so feverishly lament for.

But he was found innocent, therefore "good," despite your salt.

Drizzle [1607391]

You're justifying his murders with information Kyle didn't have, those were just citizens trying to disarm someone that 1. shouldn't have a gun and 2. had already shooting into a crowd.

Kyle travelled across state borders to put himself in a situation where he could kill someone.

Anyone that fanaticizes about killing Americans here in the US deserves life in prison or the death penalty. I don't care if that's Al-Qaeda, an indoctrinated white boy, or any other radical.



Also, that you care enough to remember the date this event took place on, and bring it up on the anniversary just to stir shit, is pathetic.

windyrockbell [2805009]

Kyle knew that as long as you're white and cry enough, you'll get away with it.


Bwaaaaaa I'm so sowwy! I dinnt mean to shoot anybowwy. Ooooh pwease forgib me!

Worked like a charm

SporkMonkey [2065017]

So you're only for constitutional Rights when it's convenient for your POV.

Got it.

Show post

A707 [2600371]

Oh, I ain't for constitutional rights, I just thought you were

Madgod [1733719]

You don't think a country should have a charter of rights at all?

A707 [2600371]

No, I just don't think that this 300 year old document should be held so highly, especially considering that some of the people that wrote it were the scum of the earth.

Thomas jefferson ****d his underage female slave, you do know?

EddieLee706 [1591144]

That doesn't matter.

The Constitution only applied to white men at the time.

Steppenwulf [2960257]

Note: I apologize for getting to this thread late in the game and responding to a post that appears in the middle of the thread. There have been quite a few poorly written positions put forward in this thread, so far as I have read, which I will forego responding to. I'm not sure what made me decide to jump on this one, except that the misinformed view of the Constitution I love is one that seems in my estimate to be so overwhelmingly held by the majority in the country the document established, and this fact causes me deep sorrow.

Absolutely incorrect. The Constitution applied then as it does now, not to any people but to the government of the United States of America.

You see, the problem is that you, like most people around the world, and in America, do not know the definition of the word "constitution". It's certainly not uncommon neither is it surprising as US public schools have not been teaching the meaning of the word for decades. Instead, I gather what most people are being taught about the Constitution is, much as you stated, that it's a meaningless, outdated document written by evil racist white sis male slave owners. So for your personal edification and that of anyone reading this god-awful forum, here is the definition of the word "constitution":

constitution

k?n″st?-too?′sh?n, -tyoo?′-

noun

1. The act or process of composing, setting up, or establishing.
2. The composition or structure of something; makeup.
3. The physical makeup of a person.

Oh... see? It's the act or process of composing, setting up, or establishing. So when we talk about the piece of parchment that contains the words of the Constitution of the United States of America, we are actually talking about a document that records the act of establishing the Country (or federation of states, to be more precise) known as The United States of America. That document defines just what the terms of the federation are. It's an agreement between the elected representatives of 13 sovereign states, and the terms of that agreement apply to the federal government that it establishes and describes, not to any person or people.

This is why the wording of the Bill of Rights is so peculiar, using verbiage such as "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

You see, the document doesn't have anything to to with what the people of the land can or cannot do, it only speaks to what the government can or cannot do. The "Bill of Rights" does not establish or grant rights, it requires the government to recognize and respect the inherent rights of humans as equals to each other. The reason these limits on the government are just and right is because the government is established by the people, of the people and for the people. All people being equal, and the government being composed of people, the government cannot exercise any power over the people except those powers that the people willfully and freely give to the government.

windyrockbell [2805009]

Kyle knew that as long as you're white and cry enough, you'll get away with it.


Bwaaaaaa I'm so sowwy! I dinnt mean to shoot anybowwy. Ooooh pwease forgib me!

Worked like a charm

Madgod [1733719]

He was found innocent because there was ample evidence showing that it was Kyle who was attacked

windyrockbell [2805009]

Kyle knew that as long as you're white and cry enough, you'll get away with it.


Bwaaaaaa I'm so sowwy! I dinnt mean to shoot anybowwy. Ooooh pwease forgib me!

Worked like a charm

windyrockbell [2805009]

Kyle knew that as long as you're white and cry enough, you'll get away with it.


Bwaaaaaa I'm so sowwy! I dinnt mean to shoot anybowwy. Ooooh pwease forgib me!

Worked like a charm

Madgod [1733719]

He was found innocent because there was ample evidence showing that it was Kyle who was attacked

Bhappychap [2270497]

Wow, aren't you black? and you support rittenhouse?

lol. You know you can't be part of that group, right? Duke doesn't allow it.


And if this kid is a "hero" in your eyes, please get a vasectomy. For the sake of everyone. But especially those closest to you.

Show post

EddieLee706 [1591144]

Who's supposed to be black?

Please indulge me

Bhappychap [2270497]

I thought Spork was, or claimed. But I don't know anymore, everyone changes their name or such.

SporkMonkey [2065017]

What does skin color have to do with anything?

Rittenhouse, a white guy, dealt with two other white guys.

You don't still believe the 100% proven false info that he shot a black dude, do you?

You do, don't you?! How embarrassing for you.

Bhappychap [2270497]

Rittenhouse has been photographed on several occasions giving the WS symbol.

Who he shot makes no difference to me. Glorifying someone who slipped through the cracks of the law, for slipping through the cracks is idiotic, at best.

A707 [2600371]

I just looked into it and it seems rittenhouse was also seen with the proud boys, a bunch of domestic terrorists. That was even a shock for me