Rittenhouse Anniversary - Page 6 | Politics & Law | TORN
Rittenhouse Anniversary
    • Madgod [1733719]
    • Role: Civilian
    • Level: 64
    • Posts: 2,325
    • Karma: 1,008
    • Last Action: 7 hours
      • 0
    • Reason:
      Are you sure you want to report this post to staff?
      Cancel
    Posted on 22:35:12 - 21/11/23 (4 months ago)
    Post link copied to clipboard Copy post link

    Capgros [2088627]




    Beat on the brat
    Beat on the brat
    Beat on the brat with a baseball bat
    Oh yeah, oh yeah, uh-oh
    Beat on the brat
    Beat on the brat
    Beat on the brat with a baseball bat
    Oh yeah, oh yeah, uh-oh
    Oh yeah, oh yeah, uh-oh
    What can you do?
    What can you do?
    With a brat like that always on your back
    What can you lose?
    What can you do?
    What can you do?
    With a brat like that always on your back
    What can you lose, lose?
    Beat on the brat
    Beat on the brat
    Beat on the brat with a baseball bat
    Oh yeah, oh yeah, uh-oh
    Beat on the brat
    Beat on the brat
    Beat on the brat with a baseball bat
    Oh yeah, oh yeah, uh-oh
    Oh yeah, oh yeah, uh-oh
    What can you do?
    What can you do?
    With a brat like that always on your back
    What can you lose?
    What can you do?
    What can you do?
    With a brat like that always on your back
    What can you lose, lose?
    Are you inciting violence?

    Probably drunk and trolling

    • Capgros [2088627]
    • Role: Civilian
    • Level: 100
    • Posts: 10,286
    • Karma: 8,600
    • Last Action: 2 hours
      • 0
    • Reason:
      Are you sure you want to report this post to staff?
      Cancel
    Posted on 22:41:03 - 21/11/23 (4 months ago)
    Post link copied to clipboard Copy post link

    Capgros [2088627]




    Beat on the brat
    Beat on the brat
    Beat on the brat with a baseball bat
    Oh yeah, oh yeah, uh-oh
    Beat on the brat
    Beat on the brat
    Beat on the brat with a baseball bat
    Oh yeah, oh yeah, uh-oh
    Oh yeah, oh yeah, uh-oh
    What can you do?
    What can you do?
    With a brat like that always on your back
    What can you lose?
    What can you do?
    What can you do?
    With a brat like that always on your back
    What can you lose, lose?
    Beat on the brat
    Beat on the brat
    Beat on the brat with a baseball bat
    Oh yeah, oh yeah, uh-oh
    Beat on the brat
    Beat on the brat
    Beat on the brat with a baseball bat
    Oh yeah, oh yeah, uh-oh
    Oh yeah, oh yeah, uh-oh
    What can you do?
    What can you do?
    With a brat like that always on your back
    What can you lose?
    What can you do?
    What can you do?
    With a brat like that always on your back
    What can you lose, lose?

    Madgod [1733719]

    Are you inciting violence?
    Sorry, next time I go with an AR-15 to a explosive demonstration, and shoot up three people. Way more peaceful.

    Better yet, I sent my 17 year old kid.
    • Gio [1607391]
    • Role: Civilian
    • Level: 100
    • Posts: 490
    • Karma: 1,044
    • Last Action: 6 hours
      • 1
    • Reason:
      Are you sure you want to report this post to staff?
      Cancel
    Posted on 22:42:25 - 21/11/23 (4 months ago)
    Post link copied to clipboard Copy post link

    A707 [2600371]

    Your hero is a killer. That's the hero of the people that vote for the "law and order" party

    SporkMonkey [2065017]

    But a hero nonetheless. f**k the ShitLib Pedos.

    A707 [2600371]

    If your "hero" wasn't waving a gun around everyone involved would've still been alive

    SporkMonkey [2065017]

    By your logic, if the pedos hadn't aggressively attacked Kyle, they'd be alive today.

    f**k em. The world is a better place.

    But good to know you wish more diddlers were walking this planet.

    A707 [2600371]

    OK, fair enough.

    But please tell me why your hero was attempting to intimidate people with weapons during a protest, which is their first amendment right.

    SporkMonkey [2065017]

    Why were the pedos trying to intimidate Kyle by attacking him with a skateboard, which is NOT protected by the 1A? They played FAFO and won with someone that was exercising their 2A Right.
    They tried to subdue him after he had already shot someone and threatened another. 

    If there was "a good guy with a gun" Kyle would be dead.
    • Madgod [1733719]
    • Role: Civilian
    • Level: 64
    • Posts: 2,325
    • Karma: 1,008
    • Last Action: 7 hours
      • 0
    • Reason:
      Are you sure you want to report this post to staff?
      Cancel
    Posted on 22:46:25 - 21/11/23 (4 months ago)
    Post link copied to clipboard Copy post link

    Capgros [2088627]




    Beat on the brat
    Beat on the brat
    Beat on the brat with a baseball bat
    Oh yeah, oh yeah, uh-oh
    Beat on the brat
    Beat on the brat
    Beat on the brat with a baseball bat
    Oh yeah, oh yeah, uh-oh
    Oh yeah, oh yeah, uh-oh
    What can you do?
    What can you do?
    With a brat like that always on your back
    What can you lose?
    What can you do?
    What can you do?
    With a brat like that always on your back
    What can you lose, lose?
    Beat on the brat
    Beat on the brat
    Beat on the brat with a baseball bat
    Oh yeah, oh yeah, uh-oh
    Beat on the brat
    Beat on the brat
    Beat on the brat with a baseball bat
    Oh yeah, oh yeah, uh-oh
    Oh yeah, oh yeah, uh-oh
    What can you do?
    What can you do?
    With a brat like that always on your back
    What can you lose?
    What can you do?
    What can you do?
    With a brat like that always on your back
    What can you lose, lose?

    Madgod [1733719]

    Are you inciting violence?

    Capgros [2088627]

    Sorry, next time I go with an AR-15 to a explosive demonstration, and shoot up three people. Way more peaceful.

    Better yet, I sent my 17 year old kid.
    shoot up three people in self defense*

    I'm sure Kyle Rittenhouse wanted to be there regardless of whether or not his parents played a role.

    I wasn't really being serious with my inciting violence comment by the way, unless of course you were calling for people to start taking bats to people with political opinions they disagree with

    Probably drunk and trolling

    • Capgros [2088627]
    • Role: Civilian
    • Level: 100
    • Posts: 10,286
    • Karma: 8,600
    • Last Action: 2 hours
      • 0
    • Reason:
      Are you sure you want to report this post to staff?
      Cancel
    Posted on 22:50:22 - 21/11/23 (4 months ago)
    Post link copied to clipboard Copy post link

    Capgros [2088627]




    Beat on the brat
    Beat on the brat
    Beat on the brat with a baseball bat
    Oh yeah, oh yeah, uh-oh
    Beat on the brat
    Beat on the brat
    Beat on the brat with a baseball bat
    Oh yeah, oh yeah, uh-oh
    Oh yeah, oh yeah, uh-oh
    What can you do?
    What can you do?
    With a brat like that always on your back
    What can you lose?
    What can you do?
    What can you do?
    With a brat like that always on your back
    What can you lose, lose?
    Beat on the brat
    Beat on the brat
    Beat on the brat with a baseball bat
    Oh yeah, oh yeah, uh-oh
    Beat on the brat
    Beat on the brat
    Beat on the brat with a baseball bat
    Oh yeah, oh yeah, uh-oh
    Oh yeah, oh yeah, uh-oh
    What can you do?
    What can you do?
    With a brat like that always on your back
    What can you lose?
    What can you do?
    What can you do?
    With a brat like that always on your back
    What can you lose, lose?

    Madgod [1733719]

    Are you inciting violence?

    Capgros [2088627]

    Sorry, next time I go with an AR-15 to a explosive demonstration, and shoot up three people. Way more peaceful.

    Better yet, I sent my 17 year old kid.

    Madgod [1733719]

    shoot up three people in self defense*

    I'm sure Kyle Rittenhouse wanted to be there regardless of whether or not his parents played a role.

    I wasn't really being serious with my inciting violence comment by the way, unless of course you were calling for people to start taking bats to people with political opinions they disagree with
    You don't get the point, he shouldn't have been there at all with an AR-15, every responsible parent knows that.

    This thread is just masturbating on a kid that was in a situation that never should've happened, glorifying violence
    • Odin-All-Father [2010524]
    • Role: Civilian
    • Level: 93
    • Posts: 7,827
    • Karma: 12,881
    • Last Action: 6 minutes
      • 1
    • Reason:
      Are you sure you want to report this post to staff?
      Cancel
    Posted on 22:56:13 - 21/11/23 (4 months ago)
    Post link copied to clipboard Copy post link

    Capgros [2088627]

    You don't get the point, he shouldn't have been there at all with an AR-15, every responsible parent knows that.

    This thread is just masturbating on a kid that was in a situation that never should've happened, glorifying violence
    You don’t get the point, people shouldn’t have been out there attacking innocent people and burning/damaging innocent peoples property.

    play stupid games win stupid prizes. No love lost for a ***** dying and other scumbags getting wounded, shouldn’t have attacked an innocent 17 year old.

    b16a796e-d0d2-4aec-9b7e-6d1a32769e79-2010524.gif?v=1040063

    • Capgros [2088627]
    • Role: Civilian
    • Level: 100
    • Posts: 10,286
    • Karma: 8,600
    • Last Action: 2 hours
      • 0
    • Reason:
      Are you sure you want to report this post to staff?
      Cancel
    Posted on 22:58:14 - 21/11/23 (4 months ago)
    Post link copied to clipboard Copy post link

    Capgros [2088627]

    You don't get the point, he shouldn't have been there at all with an AR-15, every responsible parent knows that.

    This thread is just masturbating on a kid that was in a situation that never should've happened, glorifying violence

    Odin-All-Father [2010524]

    You don’t get the point, people shouldn’t have been out there attacking innocent people and burning/damaging innocent peoples property.

    play stupid games win stupid prizes. No love lost for a ***** dying and other scumbags getting wounded, shouldn’t have attacked an innocent 17 year old.
    If the second guy he killed, had a gun and killed Rittenhouse, it would have also been technically self defense, nothing to celebrate about it.

    You people are so dumb, it isn't even funny. Fact is, he shouldn't have been there open carrying an AR-15, period, anybody claiming otherwise should never reproduce.

    You can claim it's self defense, fine, but glorifying this, is inherently violent, and stupid
    Last edited by Capgros on 23:02:43 - 21/11/23
    • Odin-All-Father [2010524]
    • Role: Civilian
    • Level: 93
    • Posts: 7,827
    • Karma: 12,881
    • Last Action: 6 minutes
      • 1
    • Reason:
      Are you sure you want to report this post to staff?
      Cancel
    Posted on 23:05:44 - 21/11/23 (4 months ago)
    Post link copied to clipboard Copy post link

    Capgros [2088627]

    You don't get the point, he shouldn't have been there at all with an AR-15, every responsible parent knows that.

    This thread is just masturbating on a kid that was in a situation that never should've happened, glorifying violence

    Odin-All-Father [2010524]

    You don’t get the point, people shouldn’t have been out there attacking innocent people and burning/damaging innocent peoples property.

    play stupid games win stupid prizes. No love lost for a ***** dying and other scumbags getting wounded, shouldn’t have attacked an innocent 17 year old.

    Capgros [2088627]

    If the second guy he killed, had a gun and killed Rittenhouse, it would have also been technically self defense, nothing to celebrate about it.

    You people are so dumb, it isn't even funny. Fact is, he shouldn't have been there open carrying an AR-15, period, anybody claiming otherwise should never reproduce.

    You can claim it's self defense, fine, but glorifying this, is inherently violent, and stupid
    No it wouldn’t, they chased him down, pointed a gun at him, attacked him with a skateboard, all whilst he was on the floor.

    It isn’t self defence when you chase someone down mate, hilarious that you’re gonna make stupid statements and then call others dumb though.

    You and all your buddies are a meme, please keep frothing.

    b16a796e-d0d2-4aec-9b7e-6d1a32769e79-2010524.gif?v=1040063

    • SporkMonkey [2065017]
    • Role: Civilian
    • Level: 100
    • Posts: 15,232
    • Karma: 44,792
    • Last Action: 16 minutes
      • 1
    • Reason:
      Are you sure you want to report this post to staff?
      Cancel
    Posted on 23:26:31 - 21/11/23 (4 months ago)
    Post link copied to clipboard Copy post link

    SporkMonkey [2065017]

    But a hero nonetheless. f**k the ShitLib Pedos.

    A707 [2600371]

    If your "hero" wasn't waving a gun around everyone involved would've still been alive

    SporkMonkey [2065017]

    By your logic, if the pedos hadn't aggressively attacked Kyle, they'd be alive today.

    f**k em. The world is a better place.

    But good to know you wish more diddlers were walking this planet.

    A707 [2600371]

    OK, fair enough.

    But please tell me why your hero was attempting to intimidate people with weapons during a protest, which is their first amendment right.

    SporkMonkey [2065017]

    Why were the pedos trying to intimidate Kyle by attacking him with a skateboard, which is NOT protected by the 1A? They played FAFO and won with someone that was exercising their 2A Right.

    Gio [1607391]

    They tried to subdue him after he had already shot someone and threatened another.

    If there was "a good guy with a gun" Kyle would be dead.
    If there wasn't a "good guy" with a gun, then Kyle would have been found guilty of taking out the pedo you so feverishly lament for.

    But he was found innocent, therefore "good," despite your salt.
    • windyrockbell [2805009]
    • Role: Civilian
    • Level: 79
    • Posts: 1,150
    • Karma: 1,567
    • Last Action: 3 minutes
      • 6
    • Reason:
      Are you sure you want to report this post to staff?
      Cancel
    Posted on 23:42:42 - 21/11/23 (4 months ago)
    Post link copied to clipboard Copy post link
    Kyle knew that as long as you're white and cry enough, you'll get away with it.


    Bwaaaaaa I'm so sowwy! I dinnt mean to shoot anybowwy. Ooooh pwease forgib me!

    Worked like a charm

    Be gay. Do crimes.

    • Steppenwulf [2960257]
    • Role: Civilian
    • Level: 53
    • Posts: 1,034
    • Karma: 1,055
    • Last Action: 4 minutes
      • 0
    • Reason:
      Are you sure you want to report this post to staff?
      Cancel
    Posted on 00:07:38 - 22/11/23 (4 months ago)
    Post link copied to clipboard Copy post link

    A707 [2600371]

    I did make up my mind. In the eyes of the law he did nothing wrong but in my eyes that man went out there to intimidate people and infringe their rights and came back with blood on his hands

    SporkMonkey [2065017]

    So you're only for constitutional Rights when it's convenient for your POV.

    Got it.

    A707 [2600371]

    Oh, I ain't for constitutional rights, I just thought you were

    Madgod [1733719]

    You don't think a country should have a charter of rights at all?

    A707 [2600371]

    No, I just don't think that this 300 year old document should be held so highly, especially considering that some of the people that wrote it were the scum of the earth.

    Thomas jefferson ****d his underage female slave, you do know?

    EddieLee706 [1591144]

    That doesn't matter.

    The Constitution only applied to white men at the time.
    Note:  I apologize for getting to this thread late in the game and responding to a post that appears in the middle of the thread.  There have been quite a few poorly written positions put forward in this thread, so far as I have read, which I will forego responding to.  I'm not sure what made me decide to jump on this one, except that the misinformed view of the Constitution I love is one that seems in my estimate to be so overwhelmingly held by the majority in the country the document established, and this fact causes me deep sorrow.

    Absolutely incorrect. The Constitution applied then as it does now, not to any people but to the government of the United States of America.

    You see, the problem is that you, like most people around the world, and in America, do not know the definition of the word "constitution". It's certainly not uncommon neither is it surprising as US public schools have not been teaching the meaning of the word for decades. Instead, I gather what most people are being taught about the Constitution is, much as you stated, that it's a meaningless, outdated document written by evil racist white sis male slave owners. So for your personal edification and that of anyone reading this god-awful forum, here is the definition of the word "constitution":

    constitution

    k?n″st?-too?′sh?n, -tyoo?′-

    noun

    1. The act or process of composing, setting up, or establishing.
    2. The composition or structure of something; makeup.
    3. The physical makeup of a person.

    Oh... see? It's the act or process of composing, setting up, or establishing. So when we talk about the piece of parchment that contains the words of the Constitution of the United States of America, we are actually talking about a document that records the act of establishing the Country (or federation of states, to be more precise) known as The United States of America. That document defines just what the terms of the federation are. It's an agreement between the elected representatives of 13 sovereign states, and the terms of that agreement apply to the federal government that it establishes and describes, not to any person or people.

    This is why the wording of the Bill of Rights is so peculiar, using verbiage such as "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

    You see, the document doesn't have anything to to with what the people of the land can or cannot do, it only speaks to what the government can or cannot do. The "Bill of Rights" does not establish or grant rights, it requires the government to recognize and respect the inherent rights of humans as equals to each other. The reason these limits on the government are just and right is because the government is established by the people, of the people and for the people. All people being equal, and the government being composed of people, the government cannot exercise any power over the people except those powers that the people willfully and freely give to the government.
    • Gio [1607391]
    • Role: Civilian
    • Level: 100
    • Posts: 490
    • Karma: 1,044
    • Last Action: 6 hours
      • 1
    • Reason:
      Are you sure you want to report this post to staff?
      Cancel
    Posted on 00:11:31 - 22/11/23 (4 months ago)
    Post link copied to clipboard Copy post link

    A707 [2600371]

    If your "hero" wasn't waving a gun around everyone involved would've still been alive

    SporkMonkey [2065017]

    By your logic, if the pedos hadn't aggressively attacked Kyle, they'd be alive today.

    f**k em. The world is a better place.

    But good to know you wish more diddlers were walking this planet.

    A707 [2600371]

    OK, fair enough.

    But please tell me why your hero was attempting to intimidate people with weapons during a protest, which is their first amendment right.

    SporkMonkey [2065017]

    Why were the pedos trying to intimidate Kyle by attacking him with a skateboard, which is NOT protected by the 1A? They played FAFO and won with someone that was exercising their 2A Right.

    Gio [1607391]

    They tried to subdue him after he had already shot someone and threatened another.

    If there was "a good guy with a gun" Kyle would be dead.

    SporkMonkey [2065017]

    If there wasn't a "good guy" with a gun, then Kyle would have been found guilty of taking out the pedo you so feverishly lament for.

    But he was found innocent, therefore "good," despite your salt.
    You're justifying his murders with information Kyle didn't have, those were just citizens trying to disarm someone that 1. shouldn't have a gun and 2. had already shooting into a crowd. 

    Kyle travelled across state borders to put himself in a situation where he could kill someone.

    Anyone that fanaticizes about killing Americans here in the US deserves life in prison or the death penalty. I don't care if that's Al-Qaeda, an indoctrinated white boy, or any other radical.



    Also, that you care enough to remember the date this event took place on, and bring it up on the anniversary just to stir shit, is pathetic.
    • SporkMonkey [2065017]
    • Role: Civilian
    • Level: 100
    • Posts: 15,232
    • Karma: 44,792
    • Last Action: 16 minutes
      • 0
    • Reason:
      Are you sure you want to report this post to staff?
      Cancel
    Posted on 00:12:53 - 22/11/23 (4 months ago)
    Post link copied to clipboard Copy post link

    SporkMonkey [2065017]

    By your logic, if the pedos hadn't aggressively attacked Kyle, they'd be alive today.

    f**k em. The world is a better place.

    But good to know you wish more diddlers were walking this planet.

    A707 [2600371]

    OK, fair enough.

    But please tell me why your hero was attempting to intimidate people with weapons during a protest, which is their first amendment right.

    SporkMonkey [2065017]

    Why were the pedos trying to intimidate Kyle by attacking him with a skateboard, which is NOT protected by the 1A? They played FAFO and won with someone that was exercising their 2A Right.

    Gio [1607391]

    They tried to subdue him after he had already shot someone and threatened another.

    If there was "a good guy with a gun" Kyle would be dead.

    SporkMonkey [2065017]

    If there wasn't a "good guy" with a gun, then Kyle would have been found guilty of taking out the pedo you so feverishly lament for.

    But he was found innocent, therefore "good," despite your salt.

    Gio [1607391]

    You're justifying his murders with information Kyle didn't have, those were just citizens trying to disarm someone that 1. shouldn't have a gun and 2. had already shooting into a crowd.

    Kyle travelled across state borders to put himself in a situation where he could kill someone.

    Anyone that fanaticizes about killing Americans here in the US deserves life in prison or the death penalty. I don't care if that's Al-Qaeda, an indoctrinated white boy, or any other radical.



    Also, that you care enough to remember the date this event took place on, and bring it up on the anniversary just to stir shit, is pathetic.
    You're trying to apply your opinion of law and ignore the actual application because it doesn't fit your narrative.

    Cry moar.
    Last edited by SporkMonkey on 00:13:06 - 22/11/23
    • Madgod [1733719]
    • Role: Civilian
    • Level: 64
    • Posts: 2,325
    • Karma: 1,008
    • Last Action: 7 hours
      • 1
    • Reason:
      Are you sure you want to report this post to staff?
      Cancel
    Posted on 00:30:15 - 22/11/23 (4 months ago)
    Post link copied to clipboard Copy post link

    windyrockbell [2805009]

    Kyle knew that as long as you're white and cry enough, you'll get away with it.


    Bwaaaaaa I'm so sowwy! I dinnt mean to shoot anybowwy. Ooooh pwease forgib me!

    Worked like a charm
    He was found innocent because there was ample evidence showing that it was Kyle who was attacked

    Probably drunk and trolling

    • EddieLee706 [1591144]
    • Role: Civilian
    • Level: 77
    • Posts: 2,480
    • Karma: 2,331
    • Last Action: 13 minutes
      • 0
    • Reason:
      Are you sure you want to report this post to staff?
      Cancel
    Posted on 00:32:52 - 22/11/23 (4 months ago)
    Post link copied to clipboard Copy post link

    SporkMonkey [2065017]

    So you're only for constitutional Rights when it's convenient for your POV.

    Got it.

    A707 [2600371]

    Oh, I ain't for constitutional rights, I just thought you were

    Madgod [1733719]

    You don't think a country should have a charter of rights at all?

    A707 [2600371]

    No, I just don't think that this 300 year old document should be held so highly, especially considering that some of the people that wrote it were the scum of the earth.

    Thomas jefferson ****d his underage female slave, you do know?

    EddieLee706 [1591144]

    That doesn't matter.

    The Constitution only applied to white men at the time.

    Steppenwulf [2960257]

    Note: I apologize for getting to this thread late in the game and responding to a post that appears in the middle of the thread. There have been quite a few poorly written positions put forward in this thread, so far as I have read, which I will forego responding to. I'm not sure what made me decide to jump on this one, except that the misinformed view of the Constitution I love is one that seems in my estimate to be so overwhelmingly held by the majority in the country the document established, and this fact causes me deep sorrow.

    Absolutely incorrect. The Constitution applied then as it does now, not to any people but to the government of the United States of America.

    You see, the problem is that you, like most people around the world, and in America, do not know the definition of the word "constitution". It's certainly not uncommon neither is it surprising as US public schools have not been teaching the meaning of the word for decades. Instead, I gather what most people are being taught about the Constitution is, much as you stated, that it's a meaningless, outdated document written by evil racist white sis male slave owners. So for your personal edification and that of anyone reading this god-awful forum, here is the definition of the word "constitution":

    constitution

    k?n″st?-too?′sh?n, -tyoo?′-

    noun

    1. The act or process of composing, setting up, or establishing.
    2. The composition or structure of something; makeup.
    3. The physical makeup of a person.

    Oh... see? It's the act or process of composing, setting up, or establishing. So when we talk about the piece of parchment that contains the words of the Constitution of the United States of America, we are actually talking about a document that records the act of establishing the Country (or federation of states, to be more precise) known as The United States of America. That document defines just what the terms of the federation are. It's an agreement between the elected representatives of 13 sovereign states, and the terms of that agreement apply to the federal government that it establishes and describes, not to any person or people.

    This is why the wording of the Bill of Rights is so peculiar, using verbiage such as "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

    You see, the document doesn't have anything to to with what the people of the land can or cannot do, it only speaks to what the government can or cannot do. The "Bill of Rights" does not establish or grant rights, it requires the government to recognize and respect the inherent rights of humans as equals to each other. The reason these limits on the government are just and right is because the government is established by the people, of the people and for the people. All people being equal, and the government being composed of people, the government cannot exercise any power over the people except those powers that the people willfully and freely give to the government.
    What I said was factual. 

    I stopped reading after absolutely incorrect.
    • Odin-All-Father [2010524]
    • Role: Civilian
    • Level: 93
    • Posts: 7,827
    • Karma: 12,881
    • Last Action: 6 minutes
      • 1
    • Reason:
      Are you sure you want to report this post to staff?
      Cancel
    Posted on 00:35:37 - 22/11/23 (4 months ago)
    Post link copied to clipboard Copy post link

    windyrockbell [2805009]

    Kyle knew that as long as you're white and cry enough, you'll get away with it.


    Bwaaaaaa I'm so sowwy! I dinnt mean to shoot anybowwy. Ooooh pwease forgib me!

    Worked like a charm

    Madgod [1733719]

    He was found innocent because there was ample evidence showing that it was Kyle who was attacked
    You can’t teach common sense mate, let the retard froth.

    b16a796e-d0d2-4aec-9b7e-6d1a32769e79-2010524.gif?v=1040063

    • EddieLee706 [1591144]
    • Role: Civilian
    • Level: 77
    • Posts: 2,480
    • Karma: 2,331
    • Last Action: 13 minutes
      • 0
    • Reason:
      Are you sure you want to report this post to staff?
      Cancel
    Posted on 00:41:42 - 22/11/23 (4 months ago)
    Post link copied to clipboard Copy post link

    windyrockbell [2805009]

    Kyle knew that as long as you're white and cry enough, you'll get away with it.


    Bwaaaaaa I'm so sowwy! I dinnt mean to shoot anybowwy. Ooooh pwease forgib me!

    Worked like a charm
    Oh shit I forgot about that face.

    That shit will be an classic.

    He might as well use his elite card and he knew if he went in he was gonna get his cheeks clapped if left alone outside of his WS circle jerk gang.
    • Asbestos [2605613]
    • Role: Civilian
    • Level: 95
    • Posts: 2,045
    • Karma: 2,511
    • Last Action: 4 hours
      • 0
    • Reason:
      Are you sure you want to report this post to staff?
      Cancel
    Posted on 01:41:15 - 22/11/23 (4 months ago)
    Post link copied to clipboard Copy post link

    windyrockbell [2805009]

    Kyle knew that as long as you're white and cry enough, you'll get away with it.


    Bwaaaaaa I'm so sowwy! I dinnt mean to shoot anybowwy. Ooooh pwease forgib me!

    Worked like a charm

    Madgod [1733719]

    He was found innocent because there was ample evidence showing that it was Kyle who was attacked
    He wasn’t found innocent. That’s not a thing. 


    He was found not guilty. There is a difference. He absolutely committed the act. There was no denial of that. He was found not guilty of a crime because of the circumstances, in this case self defense. A self defense has extremely specific rules. One of those rules is that you can’t start the fight and then claim self defense when the other party starts winning the fight. There will also be a reasonable man clause, as well as a legitimate fear (by a reasonable man in his shoes) for his life or severe bodily injury. He met that bar by all accounts. Three assailants tried to injure or kill him. People keep clinging to whether or not he should have been there (he should not). That’s a different conversation with a different subject (the parents). It has no bearing on the charges against him.
    • Steppenwulf [2960257]
    • Role: Civilian
    • Level: 53
    • Posts: 1,034
    • Karma: 1,055
    • Last Action: 4 minutes
      • 0
    • Reason:
      Are you sure you want to report this post to staff?
      Cancel
    Posted on 02:15:16 - 22/11/23 (4 months ago)
    Post link copied to clipboard Copy post link

    Bhappychap [2270497]

    Wow, aren't you black? and you support rittenhouse?

    lol. You know you can't be part of that group, right? Duke doesn't allow it.


    And if this kid is a "hero" in your eyes, please get a vasectomy. For the sake of everyone. But especially those closest to you.

    EddieLee706 [1591144]

    Who's supposed to be black?

    Please indulge me

    Bhappychap [2270497]

    I thought Spork was, or claimed. But I don't know anymore, everyone changes their name or such.

    SporkMonkey [2065017]

    What does skin color have to do with anything?

    Rittenhouse, a white guy, dealt with two other white guys.

    You don't still believe the 100% proven false info that he shot a black dude, do you?

    You do, don't you?! How embarrassing for you.

    Bhappychap [2270497]

    Rittenhouse has been photographed on several occasions giving the WS symbol.

    Who he shot makes no difference to me. Glorifying someone who slipped through the cracks of the law, for slipping through the cracks is idiotic, at best.

    A707 [2600371]

    I just looked into it and it seems rittenhouse was also seen with the proud boys, a bunch of domestic terrorists. That was even a shock for me
    1.  Provide sources when you make unsubstantiated claims.

    2. Read something about the context when you find some derogatory information about a person you want to denegrate.

    3. Kyle Rittenhouse was a non-political person who supported the BLM movement at the time of this interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=do7sbWaZstQ -- you can skip to 14:30 if you are only interested in hearing his support for BLM.

    Kyle Rittenhouse was and still is a very young man. At the time the Proud Boys photos were taken, Kyle did not know that the "OK" hand sign was also used by white supremacists to symbolize White Power. Furthermore, he's using the wrong hand for the White Power sign as it requires the right hand to form the W and P in the correct order. And finally, the proud boys he was with, who he did not know were Proud Boys at the time, were his "security detail" assigned by his subsequently fired lawyer who was using Kyle's case to further his extreme right wing agenda. Kyle Rittenhouse was not interested in becoming the poster child for the alt-right, and he fired his attorney to stop them trying to craft his public image into a "hero" of the right. Source: https://www.newsnationnow.com/banfield/kyle-rittenhouse-blames-former-lawyers-for-proud-boys-photo/.

    Kyle Rittenhouse should not be considered a hero for his actions on that fateful night in Kenosha; neither does he wish to be seen as such. There have been a lot of talking heads and politicians clamoring to promote both their own careers and their agenda from this tragic night from both sides of the aisle. But Kyle Rittenhouse was just a naive young man with a rifle who was exceedingly lucky not only to be acquitted, but also to have survived that night.
    • Rebelraider [2654066]
    • Role: Civilian
    • Level: 65
    • Posts: 260
    • Karma: 125
    • Last Action: 5 hours
      • 1
    • Reason:
      Are you sure you want to report this post to staff?
      Cancel
    Posted on 07:05:07 - 22/11/23 (4 months ago)
    Post link copied to clipboard Copy post link

    A707 [2600371]

    If your "hero" wasn't waving a gun around everyone involved would've still been alive
    Let's see video of him "waving a gun around". I'll wait.

    Welcome to Costco, I love you.

Reply
Thread Title: