"Just be honest," you say as you spend so much energy arguing a position you claim you don't actually hold.
All that's been happening in the past dozen posts is a consistent retreat on the point, narrowing in on a woman that suitably 'deserves' to be denied an abortion.
Windy: Should women who had a condom break deserve an abortion?
Asbestos: Edge case
Windy: and the 64,000 estimated pregnancies due to sexual assault of women in states where abortion is banned?
Asbestos: Edge case. irrelevant.
Windy: And women who didn't have proper access to birth control for various factors?
Asbestos: EDGE CASE!!!
You talk about irrelevant exceptions while insisting only a tiny hypothetical group of women should be used to discuss the fate of all women's bodily autonomy. I suppose if you don't actually believe in these positions it helps to explain your lack of knowledge about the details or arguments.
I'm not exactly sure what psycho-sexual drive makes you seem to always triple and quadruple down in conversations with me, but it's obviously not worth continuing to enable it.