The whole "if they had anything on trump they would've released it" is bullshit. It's silly to think trump is some sort of victim and it's even more silly to think that they would sacrifice themselves I'd trump was on that list. Stop being so delusion and come to terms because once it's released and you find him on it, you might have a heart attack.

whole load of evidence came out and now of course he crying about it being fake etc etc 

I honestly don't care if trump is on it or not, I already hate anyone connected to epstein. The trouble I have is how people jump through all these hoops into believing that their favorite politician can do no wrong. 

Normalcy Bias.

Normalcy bias, or normality bias, is a cognitive bias which leads people to disbelieve or minimize threat warnings.^[1] Consequently, individuals underestimate the likelihood of a disaster, when it might affect them, and its potential adverse effects.^[2] The normalcy bias causes many people to prepare inadequately for natural disasters, market crashes, and calamities caused by human error. About 80% of people reportedly display normalcy bias during a disaster.^[3]

The normalcy bias can manifest in response to warnings about disasters and actual catastrophes. Such events can range in scale from incidents such as traffic collisions to global catastrophic risk. The event may involve social constructionism phenomena such as loss of money in market crashes, or direct threats to continuity of life: as in natural disasters like a tsunami or violence in war.

Normalcy bias has also been called analysis paralysis, the ostrich effect,^[4] and by first responders, the negative panic.^[5] The opposite of normalcy bias is overreaction, or worst-case scenario bias,^[6][7] in which small deviations from normality are dealt with as signals of an impending catastrophe.

Someone didn’t listen to the full speach …

Oh does the part after "Some folks need killing." Put it in a better context?

Where does it say anything about political opponents?

There was a time when we used to meet evil on the battlefield.

And guess what we did to it?

We killed it!

We didn’t quibble about it.

We didn’t argue about it.

We didn’t fight about it.

We killed it!

When the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor, what did we do?

We flew to Japan, and killed the Japanese army and navy.

We didn’t even quibble about it.

I didn’t start this fight, YOU DID!  You wanted to be left alone? YOU SHOULD HAVE LEFT ME ALONE!

We didn’t argue, capitulate, talk about well maybe we shouldn’t fight the Nazi’s that hard, NO! They’re bad! Killed them.

Some liberal somewheres going to say that sounds awful…. TOO BAD!

Get mad at me if you want to.

Some folks need killing.

It’s time for somebody to say it.

It’s not matter of vengeance. It’s not a matter of being  mean. Or spiteful….It’s a matter of necessity.

We have wicked people, doing wicked things. Torturing, murdering, and raping. 

It’s time to call out to those guys in green, go have them handle it. Or boys in blue, have them go handle it.

It is t rue that he doesn't specifically say go kill liberals, but listening to the words as he shouts them really doesn't give me hope for how narrow his "people need killing" philosophy is focused.

I love that he's doing this long angry speech about some folks need killing while standing in front of a cross :P