Intricate [1957884]

Awesomepork101 [2478854]

Stonetoss is a known Nazi, intricate. Not a good look

Intricate [1957884]

Awesomepork101 [2478854]

Think he’d admit it? Read some of the comics, clearly you cherry pick.

ZickyJackz [497258]

Not exactly a fair thing, is it? That would be like if someone called you a pedo and when you said you obviously weren't, they just replied "you think they'd admit it?"

I've seen some of the comics. They're as edgy as they come. but I think that's the point. Controversy gets people talking.

Intricate [1957884]

Show post

Awesomepork101 [2478854]

Stonetoss is a known Nazi, intricate. Not a good look

Intricate [1957884]

Awesomepork101 [2478854]

Think he’d admit it? Read some of the comics, clearly you cherry pick.

ZickyJackz [497258]

Not exactly a fair thing, is it? That would be like if someone called you a pedo and when you said you obviously weren't, they just replied "you think they'd admit it?"

I've seen some of the comics. They're as edgy as they come. but I think that's the point. Controversy gets people talking.

Awesomepork101 [2478854]

Zicky, there comes a point where "making jokes" is just a way to introduce the ideas to the public. They're not jokes, they're polling to see if they're in friendly company for similar ideals, and if not, the readily available excuse you're giving them, "oh, it was just a joke, don't be so sensitive" acts as cover

Awesomepork101 [2478854]

Stonetoss is a known Nazi, intricate. Not a good look

Show post

Intricate [1957884]

Awesomepork101 [2478854]

Think he’d admit it? Read some of the comics, clearly you cherry pick.

ZickyJackz [497258]

Not exactly a fair thing, is it? That would be like if someone called you a pedo and when you said you obviously weren't, they just replied "you think they'd admit it?"

I've seen some of the comics. They're as edgy as they come. but I think that's the point. Controversy gets people talking.

Awesomepork101 [2478854]

Zicky, there comes a point where "making jokes" is just a way to introduce the ideas to the public. They're not jokes, they're polling to see if they're in friendly company for similar ideals, and if not, the readily available excuse you're giving them, "oh, it was just a joke, don't be so sensitive" acts as cover

ZickyJackz [497258]

I'm not saying it's just a joke, and not to be so sensitive. I'm saying he's pumping out controversy for clout. It's likely a grift, and less likely he's an actual nazi.

Intricate [1957884]

Show post

Awesomepork101 [2478854]

Think he’d admit it? Read some of the comics, clearly you cherry pick.

ZickyJackz [497258]

Not exactly a fair thing, is it? That would be like if someone called you a pedo and when you said you obviously weren't, they just replied "you think they'd admit it?"

I've seen some of the comics. They're as edgy as they come. but I think that's the point. Controversy gets people talking.

Awesomepork101 [2478854]

Zicky, there comes a point where "making jokes" is just a way to introduce the ideas to the public. They're not jokes, they're polling to see if they're in friendly company for similar ideals, and if not, the readily available excuse you're giving them, "oh, it was just a joke, don't be so sensitive" acts as cover

ZickyJackz [497258]

I'm not saying it's just a joke, and not to be so sensitive. I'm saying he's pumping out controversy for clout. It's likely a grift, and less likely he's an actual nazi.

Steppenwulf [2960257]

Bhappychap [2270497]

I did....You ignored the 13.7 million kids that go hungry, while at school. 3 links, you cherry picked one paragraph that kind of supports your claim, and the rest shows you that kids do in fact go hungry. Hence why some states are introducing bills for free elementary school lunches....

Steppenwulf [2960257]

No, you did not. I didn't ask you to show me a case of kids "going hungry". I asked you to show me a case of kids being denied a lunch at school. None of these three links show that, and I also googled "kids being denied lunch at school" phrased about 5 different ways and couldn't find a single article that mentions any child ever being denied a free lunch at school. -- Is it some grand conspiracy to suppress the truth? Or could it just be that it simply doesn't happen because Americans actually care about children and can't bear the thought of turning a hungry child away from a meal?

Remember, the specific point of this discussion was a meme that reads "It would be a better world if people fought as hard for every kid to have a good school lunch as they do to have every kid say the pledge of allegiance" To which I pointed out, THEY DO, and the the evidence that they do is that the pledge of allegiance is no longer being recited in classrooms across America, and at the same time, every child in school has access to a good lunch. Trying to direct the discussion into these peripheral channels of "kids going hungry" in general, or the specific policies of HOW children are provided with good lunches in schools, is disingenuous.

I don't need to cherry pick, because nothing in any of these sources makes any claim that any child has ever been denied a good lunch in an American school. Yes, I read the whole articles. And I also checked the sources they cited themselves.

Bhappychap [2270497]

You heard it here boys!

This guy can't find an article on something, it must not exist! All these states giving legislation to ensure kids eat at school is because we saw all these kids eating, and wanted to make them fat!


Not all kids get lunches/food at schools for many reasons. I gave you links showing millions of kids going hungry...at school...

Sorry your turtling argument doesn't really work on someone with more than 2 brain cells. I don't need to do an armchair search for some puff piece on kids to know that kids aren't getting lunches, because there all of these stats and measurements that prove kids don't always get food at school. But next, you should go to every single school district in america, and double check to make sure all kids are eating and they aren't denying anything based on fees/ debt/etc of the parents. I'll go ahead and read a report from people that did actually that, you keep on searching google

This took me 5 seconds on google, so not sure wtf you were searching:

https://www.clevescene.com/news/some-ohio-kids-being-denied-lunch-when-they-cant-pay-41686697

heres a reddit post: https://www.reddit.com/r/Parenting/comments/ppm7s2/help_my_niece_was_denied_lunch_at_school_and/

hawaii: https://hiappleseed.org/https:/www.civilbeat.org/2019/10/why-hawaii-kids-can-still-be-denied-school-lunches/

CA: https://abc7chicago.com/school-lunch-denied-taken-away-no/1577199/

heres a report on school lunch debts: https://educationdata.org/school-lunch-debt

here are the republicans trying to ensure a certain type of person doesn't get fed: https://newrepublic.com/article/167219/gop-states-sue-deny-lgbtq-kids-free-lunch-discrimination


Should I get one for each state, or....

Collete [1389080]

In Australia most people feed their own kids the school canteens sell food not give it away ,its not the schools job to feed them for free

Bhappychap [2270497]

I did....You ignored the 13.7 million kids that go hungry, while at school. 3 links, you cherry picked one paragraph that kind of supports your claim, and the rest shows you that kids do in fact go hungry. Hence why some states are introducing bills for free elementary school lunches....

Steppenwulf [2960257]

No, you did not. I didn't ask you to show me a case of kids "going hungry". I asked you to show me a case of kids being denied a lunch at school. None of these three links show that, and I also googled "kids being denied lunch at school" phrased about 5 different ways and couldn't find a single article that mentions any child ever being denied a free lunch at school. -- Is it some grand conspiracy to suppress the truth? Or could it just be that it simply doesn't happen because Americans actually care about children and can't bear the thought of turning a hungry child away from a meal?

Remember, the specific point of this discussion was a meme that reads "It would be a better world if people fought as hard for every kid to have a good school lunch as they do to have every kid say the pledge of allegiance" To which I pointed out, THEY DO, and the the evidence that they do is that the pledge of allegiance is no longer being recited in classrooms across America, and at the same time, every child in school has access to a good lunch. Trying to direct the discussion into these peripheral channels of "kids going hungry" in general, or the specific policies of HOW children are provided with good lunches in schools, is disingenuous.

I don't need to cherry pick, because nothing in any of these sources makes any claim that any child has ever been denied a good lunch in an American school. Yes, I read the whole articles. And I also checked the sources they cited themselves.

Bhappychap [2270497]

You heard it here boys!

This guy can't find an article on something, it must not exist! All these states giving legislation to ensure kids eat at school is because we saw all these kids eating, and wanted to make them fat!


Not all kids get lunches/food at schools for many reasons. I gave you links showing millions of kids going hungry...at school...

Sorry your turtling argument doesn't really work on someone with more than 2 brain cells. I don't need to do an armchair search for some puff piece on kids to know that kids aren't getting lunches, because there all of these stats and measurements that prove kids don't always get food at school. But next, you should go to every single school district in america, and double check to make sure all kids are eating and they aren't denying anything based on fees/ debt/etc of the parents. I'll go ahead and read a report from people that did actually that, you keep on searching google

This took me 5 seconds on google, so not sure wtf you were searching:

https://www.clevescene.com/news/some-ohio-kids-being-denied-lunch-when-they-cant-pay-41686697

heres a reddit post: https://www.reddit.com/r/Parenting/comments/ppm7s2/help_my_niece_was_denied_lunch_at_school_and/

hawaii: https://hiappleseed.org/https:/www.civilbeat.org/2019/10/why-hawaii-kids-can-still-be-denied-school-lunches/

CA: https://abc7chicago.com/school-lunch-denied-taken-away-no/1577199/

heres a report on school lunch debts: https://educationdata.org/school-lunch-debt

here are the republicans trying to ensure a certain type of person doesn't get fed: https://newrepublic.com/article/167219/gop-states-sue-deny-lgbtq-kids-free-lunch-discrimination


Should I get one for each state, or....

Collete [1389080]

In Australia most people feed their own kids the school canteens sell food not give it away ,its not the schools job to feed them for free

AineMari [2117276]

We'll all move

to Australia since they have Universal Health care, no guns, no death penalty,free access to birth control, openly gay politicians & judges, evolution is taught in all the schools< AND they pay a monthly stipend to those ineligible to receive a regular salary or wage in return for their services. Researchers, graduate students, clergy, interns and apprentices are common recipients...but..no school lunches.

Awesomepork101 [2478854]

Think he’d admit it? Read some of the comics, clearly you cherry pick.

Show post

ZickyJackz [497258]

Not exactly a fair thing, is it? That would be like if someone called you a pedo and when you said you obviously weren't, they just replied "you think they'd admit it?"

I've seen some of the comics. They're as edgy as they come. but I think that's the point. Controversy gets people talking.

Awesomepork101 [2478854]

Zicky, there comes a point where "making jokes" is just a way to introduce the ideas to the public. They're not jokes, they're polling to see if they're in friendly company for similar ideals, and if not, the readily available excuse you're giving them, "oh, it was just a joke, don't be so sensitive" acts as cover

ZickyJackz [497258]

I'm not saying it's just a joke, and not to be so sensitive. I'm saying he's pumping out controversy for clout. It's likely a grift, and less likely he's an actual nazi.

Steppenwulf [2960257]

ZickyJackz [497258]

I mean, some, yeah lol It's possible. But I think it's likely just a grift. It's easier to get infamy than fame. And on Twitter, it all pays the same.

ZickyJackz [497258]

Not exactly a fair thing, is it? That would be like if someone called you a pedo and when you said you obviously weren't, they just replied "you think they'd admit it?"

I've seen some of the comics. They're as edgy as they come. but I think that's the point. Controversy gets people talking.

Show post

Awesomepork101 [2478854]

Zicky, there comes a point where "making jokes" is just a way to introduce the ideas to the public. They're not jokes, they're polling to see if they're in friendly company for similar ideals, and if not, the readily available excuse you're giving them, "oh, it was just a joke, don't be so sensitive" acts as cover

ZickyJackz [497258]

I'm not saying it's just a joke, and not to be so sensitive. I'm saying he's pumping out controversy for clout. It's likely a grift, and less likely he's an actual nazi.

Steppenwulf [2960257]

ZickyJackz [497258]

I mean, some, yeah lol It's possible. But I think it's likely just a grift. It's easier to get infamy than fame. And on Twitter, it all pays the same.

WhackedMaki [2587660]

I mean here is a deep dive into why he is a Nazi.

Awesomepork101 [2478854]

Zicky, there comes a point where "making jokes" is just a way to introduce the ideas to the public. They're not jokes, they're polling to see if they're in friendly company for similar ideals, and if not, the readily available excuse you're giving them, "oh, it was just a joke, don't be so sensitive" acts as cover

Show post

ZickyJackz [497258]

I'm not saying it's just a joke, and not to be so sensitive. I'm saying he's pumping out controversy for clout. It's likely a grift, and less likely he's an actual nazi.

Steppenwulf [2960257]

ZickyJackz [497258]

I mean, some, yeah lol It's possible. But I think it's likely just a grift. It's easier to get infamy than fame. And on Twitter, it all pays the same.

WhackedMaki [2587660]

I mean here is a deep dive into why he is a Nazi.

Collete [1389080]

I read that post a few days ago but it doesnt show any proof he or she or they are nazis

like one of the so called facts in that is they use the same user name for 4 years like l lmfao . please post some real proof they are some kind of nazi and I will gladly call them a wanker with you

The codes got cracked because the polish resistance gave them a machine then later in the war they captured another from a submarine they never once cracked the gestapo codes though



So an edgelord like Stonetoss keeping a consistent user name for 4 years is the sort of laziness the Nazis exhibited when they reused enigma cipher codes, and inadvertently gave the allies the ability to crack it. Just like them he is giving the game away.

ZickyJackz [497258]

I'm not saying it's just a joke, and not to be so sensitive. I'm saying he's pumping out controversy for clout. It's likely a grift, and less likely he's an actual nazi.

Show post

Steppenwulf [2960257]

ZickyJackz [497258]

I mean, some, yeah lol It's possible. But I think it's likely just a grift. It's easier to get infamy than fame. And on Twitter, it all pays the same.

WhackedMaki [2587660]

I mean here is a deep dive into why he is a Nazi.

Collete [1389080]

I read that post a few days ago but it doesnt show any proof he or she or they are nazis

like one of the so called facts in that is they use the same user name for 4 years like l lmfao . please post some real proof they are some kind of nazi and I will gladly call them a wanker with you

The codes got cracked because the polish resistance gave them a machine then later in the war they captured another from a submarine they never once cracked the gestapo codes though



So an edgelord like Stonetoss keeping a consistent user name for 4 years is the sort of laziness the Nazis exhibited when they reused enigma cipher codes, and inadvertently gave the allies the ability to crack it. Just like them he is giving the game away.

WhackedMaki [2587660]

What you're calling a "fact" presented by the post is in fact not one of the facts presented by the post as an argument for it. I mean, at least you proved you read the opening paragraph, good job.

Awesomepork101 [2478854]

Think he’d admit it? Read some of the comics, clearly you cherry pick.

Show post

ZickyJackz [497258]

Not exactly a fair thing, is it? That would be like if someone called you a pedo and when you said you obviously weren't, they just replied "you think they'd admit it?"

I've seen some of the comics. They're as edgy as they come. but I think that's the point. Controversy gets people talking.

Awesomepork101 [2478854]

Zicky, there comes a point where "making jokes" is just a way to introduce the ideas to the public. They're not jokes, they're polling to see if they're in friendly company for similar ideals, and if not, the readily available excuse you're giving them, "oh, it was just a joke, don't be so sensitive" acts as cover

ZickyJackz [497258]

I'm not saying it's just a joke, and not to be so sensitive. I'm saying he's pumping out controversy for clout. It's likely a grift, and less likely he's an actual nazi.

Steppenwulf [2960257]

ZickyJackz [497258]

I mean, some, yeah lol It's possible. But I think it's likely just a grift. It's easier to get infamy than fame. And on Twitter, it all pays the same.

WhackedMaki [2587660]

I mean here is a deep dive into why he is a Nazi.