Styledcurve [2493033]

Still, the earth aint flat bro.

Styledcurve [2493033]

Still, the earth aint flat bro.

SaintLuke [2220265]

still not sure who said it was

Fistyboy [1733255]

On the Fascist - Anarchist scale I am more anarchist because I believe in limited government intervention in people's lives.

On the communist - Free trade scale, I am more communist because I believe corporations will do what benefits them above what benefits society and that government intervention in these matters is essential.

Obviously, my social ideology is contradictory to my economic ideology because one supports a more involved government while the other rejects this. A communist society without fascism has proven to not be possible, while an anarchist society must also support free trade.

Fistyboy [1733255]

On the Fascist - Anarchist scale I am more anarchist because I believe in limited government intervention in people's lives.

On the communist - Free trade scale, I am more communist because I believe corporations will do what benefits them above what benefits society and that government intervention in these matters is essential.

Obviously, my social ideology is contradictory to my economic ideology because one supports a more involved government while the other rejects this. A communist society without fascism has proven to not be possible, while an anarchist society must also support free trade.

WiseTheRumGone [2078276]

" A communist society without fascism has proven to not be possible"

I'm a capitalist and I don't agree with that. most poor countries are fascist, most communist countries were dirt poor countries. even if communism had nothing to do with fascism it would still be likely that we didn't have any good long-term communist democracies.

Fistyboy [1733255]

On the Fascist - Anarchist scale I am more anarchist because I believe in limited government intervention in people's lives.

On the communist - Free trade scale, I am more communist because I believe corporations will do what benefits them above what benefits society and that government intervention in these matters is essential.

Obviously, my social ideology is contradictory to my economic ideology because one supports a more involved government while the other rejects this. A communist society without fascism has proven to not be possible, while an anarchist society must also support free trade.

WiseTheRumGone [2078276]

" A communist society without fascism has proven to not be possible"

I'm a capitalist and I don't agree with that. most poor countries are fascist, most communist countries were dirt poor countries. even if communism had nothing to do with fascism it would still be likely that we didn't have any good long-term communist democracies.

Fistyboy [1733255]

I might be misunderstanding you but, it seems like you are agreeing with my point. Yes, countries that try to be democracies and communist to my knowledge always end up Fascist (e.g Russia still conducts "Democratic" elections).

And yes lots of fascist countries are poor, and countries like Russia and China used to be poor. I don't really get why you are stating this though.

Fistyboy [1733255]

On the Fascist - Anarchist scale I am more anarchist because I believe in limited government intervention in people's lives.

On the communist - Free trade scale, I am more communist because I believe corporations will do what benefits them above what benefits society and that government intervention in these matters is essential.

Obviously, my social ideology is contradictory to my economic ideology because one supports a more involved government while the other rejects this. A communist society without fascism has proven to not be possible, while an anarchist society must also support free trade.

WiseTheRumGone [2078276]

" A communist society without fascism has proven to not be possible"

I'm a capitalist and I don't agree with that. most poor countries are fascist, most communist countries were dirt poor countries. even if communism had nothing to do with fascism it would still be likely that we didn't have any good long-term communist democracies.

Fistyboy [1733255]

I might be misunderstanding you but, it seems like you are agreeing with my point. Yes, countries that try to be democracies and communist to my knowledge always end up Fascist (e.g Russia still conducts "Democratic" elections).

And yes lots of fascist countries are poor, and countries like Russia and China used to be poor. I don't really get why you are stating this though.

WiseTheRumGone [2078276]

what I'm saying is that if a developed country adopts a form socialism/communism they might not end up fascist

Fistyboy [1733255]

On the Fascist - Anarchist scale I am more anarchist because I believe in limited government intervention in people's lives.

On the communist - Free trade scale, I am more communist because I believe corporations will do what benefits them above what benefits society and that government intervention in these matters is essential.

Obviously, my social ideology is contradictory to my economic ideology because one supports a more involved government while the other rejects this. A communist society without fascism has proven to not be possible, while an anarchist society must also support free trade.

Fistyboy [1733255]

On the Fascist - Anarchist scale I am more anarchist because I believe in limited government intervention in people's lives.

On the communist - Free trade scale, I am more communist because I believe corporations will do what benefits them above what benefits society and that government intervention in these matters is essential.

Obviously, my social ideology is contradictory to my economic ideology because one supports a more involved government while the other rejects this. A communist society without fascism has proven to not be possible, while an anarchist society must also support free trade.

WiseTheRumGone [2078276]

" A communist society without fascism has proven to not be possible"

I'm a capitalist and I don't agree with that. most poor countries are fascist, most communist countries were dirt poor countries. even if communism had nothing to do with fascism it would still be likely that we didn't have any good long-term communist democracies.

Fistyboy [1733255]

I might be misunderstanding you but, it seems like you are agreeing with my point. Yes, countries that try to be democracies and communist to my knowledge always end up Fascist (e.g Russia still conducts "Democratic" elections).

And yes lots of fascist countries are poor, and countries like Russia and China used to be poor. I don't really get why you are stating this though.

WiseTheRumGone [2078276]

what I'm saying is that if a developed country adopts a form socialism/communism they might not end up fascist

Fistyboy [1733255]

On the Fascist - Anarchist scale I am more anarchist because I believe in limited government intervention in people's lives.

On the communist - Free trade scale, I am more communist because I believe corporations will do what benefits them above what benefits society and that government intervention in these matters is essential.

Obviously, my social ideology is contradictory to my economic ideology because one supports a more involved government while the other rejects this. A communist society without fascism has proven to not be possible, while an anarchist society must also support free trade.

WiseTheRumGone [2078276]

" A communist society without fascism has proven to not be possible"

I'm a capitalist and I don't agree with that. most poor countries are fascist, most communist countries were dirt poor countries. even if communism had nothing to do with fascism it would still be likely that we didn't have any good long-term communist democracies.

Fistyboy [1733255]

I might be misunderstanding you but, it seems like you are agreeing with my point. Yes, countries that try to be democracies and communist to my knowledge always end up Fascist (e.g Russia still conducts "Democratic" elections).

And yes lots of fascist countries are poor, and countries like Russia and China used to be poor. I don't really get why you are stating this though.

WiseTheRumGone [2078276]

what I'm saying is that if a developed country adopts a form socialism/communism they might not end up fascist

Tyrion [1967379]

Interesting, what makes you think that as a citizin of any country, you have any say in legislations or any form of governance anyways?

Voting on some individual or political party every few years?

I see this notion as simple mindf**k, also political campaigns are paid by either tax money or "donations" by those wealthy enough that would profit from certain legislations.

The truly wealth ones, sponsor all sides and therefore benefit the most from any camp eh

Fistyboy [1733255]

On the Fascist - Anarchist scale I am more anarchist because I believe in limited government intervention in people's lives.

On the communist - Free trade scale, I am more communist because I believe corporations will do what benefits them above what benefits society and that government intervention in these matters is essential.

Obviously, my social ideology is contradictory to my economic ideology because one supports a more involved government while the other rejects this. A communist society without fascism has proven to not be possible, while an anarchist society must also support free trade.

Show post

WiseTheRumGone [2078276]

" A communist society without fascism has proven to not be possible"

I'm a capitalist and I don't agree with that. most poor countries are fascist, most communist countries were dirt poor countries. even if communism had nothing to do with fascism it would still be likely that we didn't have any good long-term communist democracies.

Fistyboy [1733255]

I might be misunderstanding you but, it seems like you are agreeing with my point. Yes, countries that try to be democracies and communist to my knowledge always end up Fascist (e.g Russia still conducts "Democratic" elections).

And yes lots of fascist countries are poor, and countries like Russia and China used to be poor. I don't really get why you are stating this though.

WiseTheRumGone [2078276]

what I'm saying is that if a developed country adopts a form socialism/communism they might not end up fascist

Tyrion [1967379]

Interesting, what makes you think that as a citizin of any country, you have any say in legislations or any form of governance anyways?

Voting on some individual or political party every few years?

I see this notion as simple mindf**k, also political campaigns are paid by either tax money or "donations" by those wealthy enough that would profit from certain legislations.

The truly wealth ones, sponsor all sides and therefore benefit the most from any camp eh

WiseTheRumGone [2078276]

because every politician that gets elected is someone I and my country voted for. money isn't a thing in Danish politics, everyone gets mandatory time on-air and funding from the government. every single vote you get gets you funding for the next election.

in Denmark, the rich don't have a say in politics.

RambleRocket [2200354]

to be fair, i dont see any difference between a fascist and a communist.

there is economic differences such as commies wanting to ban private property and wanting their big government to run all business which kinda overwhelms the system as its biting off too much to chew. but both governments are just radical authoritarianist dictatorships so i dont really see much difference.

RambleRocket [2200354]

to be fair, i dont see any difference between a fascist and a communist.

there is economic differences such as commies wanting to ban private property and wanting their big government to run all business which kinda overwhelms the system as its biting off too much to chew. but both governments are just radical authoritarianist dictatorships so i dont really see much difference.

Viracocha [1772040]

nuclear is green energy?

ok.

So you are volunteering Denmark to be the global nuclear waste repository site? Noice.

RambleRocket [2200354]

nuclear is green because it gives off that green radioactive glow lol

Bhappychap [2270497]

Nuclear is "green" because it is the most efficient power producer to waste operation we have.

A country's entire set nuclear powerplants take less resources than even a single moderately sized wind or solar farm. Resources being the act of gathering materials, building, training people, and continued use over the years.

It is also one of the safest, when compared with coal, gas, etc.

In fact the only tricky part is waste disposal, of which is an actual concern. If we raise our nuclear capacity, the waste has a to have a good plan for cleaning/removal. While there has been advances here recently, its the elephant in the room there.

Viracocha [1772040]

nuclear is green energy?

ok.

So you are volunteering Denmark to be the global nuclear waste repository site? Noice.

RambleRocket [2200354]

nuclear is green because it gives off that green radioactive glow lol

Bhappychap [2270497]

Nuclear is "green" because it is the most efficient power producer to waste operation we have.

A country's entire set nuclear powerplants take less resources than even a single moderately sized wind or solar farm. Resources being the act of gathering materials, building, training people, and continued use over the years.

It is also one of the safest, when compared with coal, gas, etc.

In fact the only tricky part is waste disposal, of which is an actual concern. If we raise our nuclear capacity, the waste has a to have a good plan for cleaning/removal. While there has been advances here recently, its the elephant in the room there.

Finwe [2610862]

Yes but in case you haven't noticed nuclear waste gives off serious amounts of radiation and is extremely dangerous especially since it takes hundreds of years to stop giving off radiation. So I would rather have gasoline than nuclear energy until they finally get fusion going

Viracocha [1772040]

nuclear is green energy?

ok.

So you are volunteering Denmark to be the global nuclear waste repository site? Noice.

RambleRocket [2200354]

nuclear is green because it gives off that green radioactive glow lol

Bhappychap [2270497]

Nuclear is "green" because it is the most efficient power producer to waste operation we have.

A country's entire set nuclear powerplants take less resources than even a single moderately sized wind or solar farm. Resources being the act of gathering materials, building, training people, and continued use over the years.

It is also one of the safest, when compared with coal, gas, etc.

In fact the only tricky part is waste disposal, of which is an actual concern. If we raise our nuclear capacity, the waste has a to have a good plan for cleaning/removal. While there has been advances here recently, its the elephant in the room there.

Viracocha [1772040]

nuclear is green energy?

ok.

So you are volunteering Denmark to be the global nuclear waste repository site? Noice.

RambleRocket [2200354]

nuclear is green because it gives off that green radioactive glow lol

Bhappychap [2270497]

Nuclear is "green" because it is the most efficient power producer to waste operation we have.

A country's entire set nuclear powerplants take less resources than even a single moderately sized wind or solar farm. Resources being the act of gathering materials, building, training people, and continued use over the years.

It is also one of the safest, when compared with coal, gas, etc.

In fact the only tricky part is waste disposal, of which is an actual concern. If we raise our nuclear capacity, the waste has a to have a good plan for cleaning/removal. While there has been advances here recently, its the elephant in the room there.

Phil-I-P [2035498]

UK.GOV

I know this isn't exactly what you're talking about, but I found it interesting.

"The amount of radioactive waste produced in the UK is very small compared to all other forms of waste. The total mass of radioactive waste in stock and estimated to be produced over the next 100-year period will be around 5.1 million tonnes. This sounds like a lot, but, for context, the UK currently produces around 5.3 million tonnes of hazardous waste from households and businesses every year.

When packaged, the total amount of radioactive waste produced in the UK (including waste in stock and estimated to arise over the next 100-plus years) would fill a volume around 4.5 million cubic metres, roughly the size of Wembley stadium." - quoted from the above link.

We've been using nuclear for a while now. There hasn't been a problem, and they are regularly maintained and improved as the technology gets better.

People forget that Chernobyl was using 70's Soviet technology. It was also human error. I think these days we have a better grasp of health and safety when it comes to nuke stations.

As far as the waste goes, I know it isn't ideal, but at least it is stored in a purpose built bunker. Where does the waste go from coal stations? Id rather the storage facility than into the sky.