Just trolling along Its been fun. I see why people do it, its much easier then holding a conversation with someone.
JFK and JFK 2.0 just declare on my ZurichTORN SpecOPS faction and have some real fun, enjoyed the war with JFK and SA would be great to see the details of some of the high stats battles for everyone to enjoy hoorahhh
Welcome to the ZurichTORN SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES (ZSOF)
Courage,Honor,Trust,Integrity,Commitment,Country ZurichTORN SpecOPS
Just wondering why JFK haven't claimed the victory over SA.
Itsy Bitsi Bikini(IBB) is recruiting.
We need chainers with atleast 250mil BS and we are leniant if you are very active in wars and loyal to faction members. So if you think you are good enough then join us.
Conditions apply.
By DB_farid [1398886]
Just wondering why JFK haven't claimed the victory over SA.
that would be something 007 needs to mail z and nota about himself and doesnt really belong here
Another flaw in a poor war system
Flaw? So is that why you held all those other factions in your warbase for a very long time?
We had a deal with them. All were happy appart from one faction that had a very abusive leader so we didn't claim straight away. The flaw is that there are not enough targets for us and that a war can never end if the winner doesn't claim.
By Rick_Diculous [984129]
I was pretty surprised to learn SA doesnt use IRC to chain, I always thought N.O.O.B would be the only HOF faction to get away with that .
Congrats JFK, job well done
Yepp, we're the best unorganized inactive lazy beasts.
#1
By DB_farid [1398886]
Just wondering why JFK haven't claimed the victory over SA.
that would be something 007 needs to mail z and nota about himself and doesnt really belong here
Another flaw in a poor war system
Just doing our part to advertise what else needs to be changed soon. Whether its through an agreement or not, a winning faction shouldnt be able to sit on the loser UNTIL THE END OF TIME.
By DB_farid [1398886]
Just wondering why JFK haven't claimed the victory over SA.
that would be something 007 needs to mail z and nota about himself and doesnt really belong here
Another flaw in a poor war system
Flaw? So is that why you held all those other factions in your warbase for a very long time?
We had a deal with them. All were happy appart from one faction that had a very abusive leader so we didn't claim straight away. The flaw is that there are not enough targets for us and that a war can never end if the winner doesn't claim.
So it is a flaw when someone else does it to you, but it is you simply helping out the other faction when you do it. Nice to know lol.
I have read that the war which you won and didn't claim would be automatically be over and no nap would be there betwwen them if no hit is made in those 7 days in the war.
Last Edited: Fri Nov 30, 2012 17:55:12
Itsy Bitsi Bikini(IBB) is recruiting.
We need chainers with atleast 250mil BS and we are leniant if you are very active in wars and loyal to faction members. So if you think you are good enough then join us.
Conditions apply.
By DB_farid [1398886]
Just wondering why JFK haven't claimed the victory over SA.
that would be something 007 needs to mail z and nota about himself and doesnt really belong here
Another flaw in a poor war system
Just doing our part to advertise what else needs to be changed soon. Whether its through an agreement or not, a winning faction shouldnt be able to sit on the loser UNTIL THE END OF TIME.
This game is all about warring, yet Ched insists on improving other stuff before attempting to fix warring. It seems that because the HOF is a small group of players, it doesn't need improving as a priority. The way I see it, most new players aspire to be in a HOF faction, so, the system should be built to make it as fun and competitive as possible in order to attract and keep new players spending their money tryIng to catch up on stats.
By DB_farid [1398886]
Just wondering why JFK haven't claimed the victory over SA.
that would be something 007 needs to mail z and nota about himself and doesnt really belong here
Another flaw in a poor war system
Flaw? So is that why you held all those other factions in your warbase for a very long time?
We had a deal with them. All were happy appart from one faction that had a very abusive leader so we didn't claim straight away. The flaw is that there are not enough targets for us and that a war can never end if the winner doesn't claim.
So it is a flaw when someone else does it to you, but it is you simply helping out the other faction when you do it. Nice to know lol.
We had a deal and they were happy. I still agree that it's a flaw in the system though.
By LeukyBear [83808] So it is a flaw when someone else does it to you, but it is you simply helping out the other faction when you do it. Nice to know lol.
Most of them declared on us because I paid (slut factions). Do you see the difference here?
By Rick_Diculous [984129]
I was pretty surprised to learn SA doesnt use IRC to chain, I always thought N.O.O.B would be the only HOF faction to get away with that .
Congrats JFK, job well done
Yepp, we're the best unorganized inactive lazy beasts.
#1
DA must be so pissed lol
All the smack talk by SA (before the war), coupled with all the crying done by JFK made me think this was going to be one of the best wars in recent memory
Stacking e is one thing that is ruining these big wars. The concept on paper is great for smaller factions to be able to beat larger factions but is a little silly in wars like this where everyone has thousands of e
Another thing that would be nice is the game allowed us to set terms (within the game) for wars prior to their start. For example in this war Im sure both sides would have agreed on more respect needed before the war would be over
By Rick_Diculous [984129]
I was pretty surprised to learn SA doesnt use IRC to chain, I always thought N.O.O.B would be the only HOF faction to get away with that .
Congrats JFK, job well done
Yepp, we're the best unorganized inactive lazy beasts.
#1
DA must be so pissed lol
All the smack talk by SA (before the war), coupled with all the crying done by JFK made me think this was going to be one of the best wars in recent memory
Stacking e is one thing that is ruining these big wars. The concept on paper is great for smaller factions to be able to beat larger factions but is a little silly in wars like this where everyone has thousands of e
Another thing that would be nice is the game allowed us to set terms (within the game) for wars prior to their start. For example in this war Im sure both sides would have agreed on more respect needed before the war would be over
Chedburn
Reply | Quote | Report
Thread created on Fri Jul 27, 2012 04:41:39
Last replied to on Fri Jul 27, 2012 05:41:39
Based on lots of feedback from the committee, we've changed the warring cap.
You can now declare war on as many factions as you like, as long as the total member count is 300 or under. I.e. you can declare on 300 1 member factions, or 3 100 member factions. You will also not gain more or less respect depending on how many users are in each faction. There is now a standard default gain.
This update is to keep everyone happy and factions flowing while we prepare an overhaul of factional warfare, which will be much simpler to understand and will include competitive, vengeful and termed warring. This would follow the large attacking change we're currently working on.
Thanks.
I was in the player committee when the idea of competitive, vengeful and termed warring was agreed with Ched. I wonder if this will still go ahead considering Torn 2.0 has been announced. If I remember rightly it's been about 8-12 months since this was suggested by committee members. It's a shame because I'd say this should have been top priority.
Stacking e is a shitty part of the game, what makes it worse only the rich can use it, dunno how the weaker gain a advantage to stack e when they cant afford too
Last Edited: Sat Dec 01, 2012 12:54:16
Extractor - Noob At Heart Master Of All A Noob With A Difference Take Care We May Extract Something From You
Follow @TornRPG