Forums
First  << 1 >>  Last
Forum Main>>Suggestions>> New faction permissions.
DB_farid

ID: 1398886
Level: 69
Posts: 6038
Score: 3387
IBB DB_farid [1398886]Reply | Quote | Report

Thread created on Thu Dec 05, 2013 13:27:39
Last replied to on Thu Mar 20, 2014 10:35:25
As the worst thing scamming is legal, and no one can do anything about that. And even the hof factions were back stabbed by one of their most loyal players.

And in factions there is a risk of getting scammed by co.
But without co running a faction isn't an easy task. So I am suggesting few jobs/ranks/permissions for the positions.

War General(WG):- You may have understood just by name the work of him. He would be the person who would be able to declare and claim wars.
An extra addition: War general will also have the permission to accept and send naps.

And here are few more suggestions which may be make faction forum more of a base for making strategies.

As we know there's a different forum for admins and staff for discussing future endeavours so here's my idea.


Faction Committee(FC):- This permission will give a member permission to browse and post into sub forum in faction forum which would be visble by only those members with this permission. The leader and co-leader will have this automatically.

For any more input just mail post here.


Looks like Application manager wasn't needed at all.

Last Edited: Thu Mar 20, 2014 10:37:31
5770a01d-5dad-7f6a-83816.png
Super secret reinforced spam barrier 2.0
Hades

ID: 1728299
Level: 35
Posts: 4592
Score: 2851
LODHades [1728299]Reply | Quote | Report

Posted on Thu Dec 05, 2013 14:05:18
By Hades [1728299]
By Butters [34298]
You could just give the whatever permissions you're comfortable with them having then if you don't trust them with vault access?

Not the vault. you cannot decide to remove their privileges on vault access. Everything else is editable though.

This might require the addition of a a new permission to declare and claim victory for wars - to be honest there's lots of factions that would probably be keen on being able to set someone up as a "war manager" without giving them full co-leader access.


I totally agree. Maybe Ched should introduce more ranks within the faction itself. Like soldier, hitman, Enforcer and many other titles with some ranks with more privileges than others.



I was thinking something along those lines too.

Good idea.

2mr8sav.png
Super secret reinforced spam barrier 2.0
Rune_

ID: 1583524
Level: 35
Posts: 1870
Score: 1070
TORune_ [1583524]Reply | Quote | Report

Posted on Thu Dec 05, 2013 14:21:54
R+

My DeviantArt account
kerbx.deviantart.com/
Super secret reinforced spam barrier 2.0
Melbux

ID: 696715
Level: 43
Posts: 5306
Score: 4714
MnCMelbux [696715]Reply | Quote | Report

Posted on Thu Dec 05, 2013 21:52:56
Warmaster or War Manager or what other name this idea had in past suggestions, is a meaning one which would be profitable for most of factions.
Activity Manager has too much powerful authorisation and, in wrong hands, may be dangerous to faction's stability (same like CO, which is a cause of creating this thread).

53eee798-c5b5-422f-696715.png
Super secret reinforced spam barrier 2.0
DB_farid

ID: 1398886
Level: 69
Posts: 6038
Score: 3387
IBBDB_farid [1398886]Reply | Quote | Report

Posted on Thu Jan 09, 2014 07:54:12
By Melbux [696715]
Warmaster or War Manager or what other name this idea had in past suggestions, is a meaning one which would be profitable for most of factions.
Activity Manager has too much powerful authorisation and, in wrong hands, may be dangerous to faction's stability (same like CO, which is a cause of creating this thread).


Yep WM is really great. And AM would be like 2nd co-leader and these person are really those who think before doing anything.

5770a01d-5dad-7f6a-83816.png
Super secret reinforced spam barrier 2.0
Wollongong

ID: 12833
Level: 72
Posts: 17584
Score: 3944
TrueWollongong [12833]Reply | Quote | Report

Posted on Thu Jan 09, 2014 09:07:20
I would very much like a war general.
The activity manager seems a bit redundant to me.

OriginalOwner.png
Super secret reinforced spam barrier 2.0
DB_farid

ID: 1398886
Level: 69
Posts: 6038
Score: 3387
IBBDB_farid [1398886]Reply | Quote | Report

Posted on Fri Mar 14, 2014 10:11:38
By Wollongong [12833]
I would very much like a war general.
The activity manager seems a bit redundant to me.


Removed and edited the post.

5770a01d-5dad-7f6a-83816.png
Super secret reinforced spam barrier 2.0
Second2none

ID: 1615950
Level: 48
Posts: 447
Score: 103
M†MSecond2none [1615950]Reply | Quote | Report

Posted on Mon Mar 17, 2014 19:59:20
R+

Suggested additions:

War General, could also have this right:
- Mark targets faction in warbase (they will have different color) to clarify where bonuses should be taken.

Added Role: "Chainmaster"
- Different color in chat for easier see who is in charge in chains, small thing but will same time and trouble.
- Might be other relevant things to add


Futhermore, give NAP right to co-leader also


If you are active and a good chainer come join Memento Mori!
Link to recruitment thread
Super secret reinforced spam barrier 2.0
Bradley

ID: 1800626
Level: 15
Posts: 338
Score: 364
LCN.Bradley [1800626]Reply | Quote | Report

Posted on Mon Mar 17, 2014 20:03:22
By Second2none [1615950]
R+

Suggested additions:

War General, could also have this right:
- Mark targets faction in warbase (they will have different color) to clarify where bonuses should be taken.

Added Role: "Chainmaster"
- Different color in chat for easier see who is in charge in chains, small thing but will same time and trouble.
- Might be other relevant things to add


Futhermore, give NAP right to co-leader also


Most factions that chain properly and effectively use irc for the addition of a chaining bot so I personally dont see the point in an addition of a chain master but hey thats my opinion


Super secret reinforced spam barrier 2.0
Second2none

ID: 1615950
Level: 48
Posts: 447
Score: 103
M†MSecond2none [1615950]Reply | Quote | Report

Posted on Tue Mar 18, 2014 01:28:24
By Bradley [1800626]
By Second2none [1615950]
R+

Suggested additions:

War General, could also have this right:
- Mark targets faction in warbase (they will have different color) to clarify where bonuses should be taken.

Added Role: "Chainmaster"
- Different color in chat for easier see who is in charge in chains, small thing but will same time and trouble.
- Might be other relevant things to add


Futhermore, give NAP right to co-leader also


Most factions that chain properly and effectively use irc for the addition of a chaining bot so I personally dont see the point in an addition of a chain master but hey thats my opinion


I like to keep all in torn, no need to external clients and servers for such simple thing... these function and a chaining bot should already be in torn to my opinion, IRL also have disadvantages.

If you are active and a good chainer come join Memento Mori!
Link to recruitment thread
Super secret reinforced spam barrier 2.0
eMeR1CaH

ID: 1748280
Level: 27
Posts: 295
Score: 201
JFAeMeR1CaH [1748280]Reply | Quote | Report

Posted on Tue Mar 18, 2014 02:54:01
It would be cool if people could only remove the amount of cash they've put in the faction! If they donate 100m they can take 100m out only! Would stop scamming if imagine

Super secret reinforced spam barrier 2.0
Rams

ID: 1019019
Level: 50
Posts: 1398
Score: 256
REVORams [1019019]Reply | Quote | Report

Posted on Tue Mar 18, 2014 07:27:23
By eMeR1CaH [1748280]
It would be cool if people could only remove the amount of cash they've put in the faction! If they donate 100m they can take 100m out only! Would stop scamming if imagine


Definitely like this idea.

1366678964.gif
Super secret reinforced spam barrier 2.0
IIIlusionist

ID: 253384
Level: 50
Posts: 2840
Score: 208
[ĐA]IIIlusionist [253384]Reply | Quote | Report

Posted on Tue Mar 18, 2014 07:36:42
By Rams [1019019]
By eMeR1CaH [1748280]
It would be cool if people could only remove the amount of cash they've put in the faction! If they donate 100m they can take 100m out only! Would stop scamming if imagine


Definitely like this idea.


like it...might be a problem if ched doesn't want majority of players to have a place where they can have instant access to their cash all the time. atm its limited my you leaders activity and trust you have in them.

jAtBWdDspKrMG.png
Made By CarolDanvers
Super secret reinforced spam barrier 2.0
DB_farid

ID: 1398886
Level: 69
Posts: 6038
Score: 3387
IBBDB_farid [1398886]Reply | Quote | Report

Posted on Thu Mar 20, 2014 10:35:25
By Second2none [1615950]
R

Suggested additions:

War General, could also have this right:
- Mark targets faction in warbase (they will have different color) to clarify where bonuses should be taken.

Added Role: "Chainmaster"
- Different color in chat for easier see who is in charge in chains, small thing but will same time and trouble.
- Might be other relevant things to add


Futhermore, give NAP right to co-leader also


Well nap power maybe given to War general too as he would be the factions startegist for wars and all the matters for that. And for chainmaster I think it won't be feasible in the torn because the colour system would require a lot of work so to show it in different chats too other than faction chat.

5770a01d-5dad-7f6a-83816.png
Forum Main>>Suggestions>> New faction permissions.
First  << 1 >>  Last