Forums
First  << 1 >>  Last
Forum Main>>Suggestions>> World War.
Evil_Hamster

ID: 794548
Level: 71
Posts: 1592
Score: 814
DB Evil_Hamster [794548]Reply | Quote | Report

Thread created on Wed Sep 11, 2013 06:30:37
Last replied to on Wed Sep 11, 2013 13:37:40
Someone probably posted about this last year - but Im not going to bring it back from the dead..

So.

Firstly I imagine the players that rate this down will be free-loaders, however...For the ones that want to say this but dont want slating I'll type it I dont mind trolls and slaters...

The World War seems to relate to three types of players.

1. The hitters, they go all out and sell items to make cash to buy energy to attack.

2. The ones that start off well and then realise they cant catch the top 3 and stop. Do the occasional hit and mug.

3. Free loaders, cant be bothered but want a merit...

And its the Free loaders that I want to talk about.

These are the players that want everything handed to them, they want an easy game where money and items are free. They rate down threads that highlight their game style and they usually hang in forums or chat slating or moaning.

So I ask you..

If you had a faction in war and you look at the attack logs and see a player sat in Torn doing feck all draining your respect with the "I cant be arsed to fight, but I like the faction specials" - what would you do? Answer - very simple, they are history, tell your story walking and mind the door doesnt hit the back of your head on the way out.

I truly think that players that do NOT contribute a certain amount of hits for the Country they signed for should be removed or not given a merit and I know I am not the only one thinking this.

It'd be easy enough to code in PHP and would make for a much better fight.

Flame away, I'm just saying what others are thinking.

Hamster.jpg
Super secret reinforced spam barrier 2.0
bloodred

ID: 662077
Level: 71
Posts: 5674
Score: 2506
Shhhbloodred [662077]Reply | Quote | Report

Posted on Wed Sep 11, 2013 08:48:34
im totally with you

but thats not all thats wrong with WW

the current system is built so that only large countrys have a chance
small ones, no matter how active, have no possibility in winning as no matter how much E we spend we can never match the amount of E large countrys spend



Super secret reinforced spam barrier 2.0
Evil_Hamster

ID: 794548
Level: 71
Posts: 1592
Score: 814
DBEvil_Hamster [794548]Reply | Quote | Report

Posted on Wed Sep 11, 2013 09:02:10
Ah but with the small Countries comes a clever option..

IF you are in the top 3 you get a chance to SWOP flags - so hit hard and you can change.

But yes in General, you're likely to get beaten badly I see some with negative scores.






Hamster.jpg
Super secret reinforced spam barrier 2.0
bloodred

ID: 662077
Level: 71
Posts: 5674
Score: 2506
Shhhbloodred [662077]Reply | Quote | Report

Posted on Wed Sep 11, 2013 13:22:06
yea top 3 i can manage, but still, i cant join myanmar cos their 2500 people are already there

and other countrys dont have a chance by the look of it this year

so im basically just using this WW as an excuse to do a lot of attacking again



Super secret reinforced spam barrier 2.0
TheDarkLegacy

ID: 1712562
Level: 38
Posts: 8737
Score: 7735
TFCTheDarkLegacy [1712562]Reply | Quote | Report

Posted on Wed Sep 11, 2013 13:37:40
By Evil_Hamster [794548]
Ah but with the small Countries comes a clever option..

IF you are in the top 3 you get a chance to SWOP flags - so hit hard and you can change.

But yes in General, you're likely to get beaten badly I see some with negative scores.






I wish I could SWOP

It's annoying how far ahead Myanmar has got because of the main factions + 1000 multies :/

Last Edited: Wed Sep 11, 2013 13:38:42
4d6200cf-2566-238e-1712562.png

This signature has been viewed 5KHG.jpg times!
Forum Main>>Suggestions>> World War.
First  << 1 >>  Last