Forums
First  << 1 >>  Last
Forum Main>>Questions>> Company question
NitroDex

ID: 918327
Level: 53
Posts: 2190
Score: 1252
NitroDex [918327]Reply | Quote | Report
Thread created on Thu Jan 31, 2013 17:05:22
Last replied to on Fri Feb 01, 2013 03:41:33
I see plenty of companies where there is only type of employee[say agents in cruises,producers in TV corporations, drillers in rigs] filling in 99% of the positions.

I don't understand why they don't need a reasonable amount of the other employees.[say at least 10% of the positions]

For example: A TV corporation would require at least a few programmers and a few directors right?

Super secret reinforced spam barrier 2.0
paulG

ID: 1281694
Level: 29
Posts: 413
Score: 91
paulG [1281694]Reply | Quote | Report
Posted on Thu Jan 31, 2013 17:23:34
directors choice i guess

Super secret reinforced spam barrier 2.0
Realism

ID: 1615443
Level: 38
Posts: 580
Score: 175
Realism [1615443]Reply | Quote | Report
Posted on Thu Jan 31, 2013 17:56:11
That would fit in suggestions i say. We could suggest creating more jobs in the companies


Super secret reinforced spam barrier 2.0
David

ID: 132845
Level: 67
Posts: 2601
Score: 1105
«RP»David [132845]Reply | Quote | Report
Posted on Fri Feb 01, 2013 02:59:50
Because they are the bread and butter of the company. Would you even imagine a sports team with 50% of its employees being waterboys?

Once a Red Panda, always a Red Panda!
My 5★ Sports Team is hiring EVERYONE active! 30 spots left... Just apply :)
Super secret reinforced spam barrier 2.0
Penicillin

ID: 1517799
Level: 55
Posts: 1639
Score: 862
JFAPenicillin [1517799]Reply | Quote | Report
Posted on Fri Feb 01, 2013 03:41:33
Because it is the most profitable way to do it.

You can't really use logic or how it is in real life when it comes to this stuff.

Forum Main>>Questions>> Company question
First  << 1 >>  Last