firing emp is not the best solution and does not reflect reality you would be firing like 2-3 emp daily maybe more...to keep good efficiency..and not so easy to get new emp (i mean gud one and active)
I completely agree with this idea. I think something could definitely be done to penalise the employee rather than the company for them performing poorly. Yes it does need to effect the company as poor employees do effect company profits but it needs to be in the correct proportion. I refer to Azrael's comment above - I have similar problems - one or two employees at one star means the difference between a good day (24-25mil) and a woeful day (11-12mil or less). Surely my other 28 or 29 employees are still working ??? They haven't all downed tools have they ??
I agree for sure, but you forget why they set this in place the way they did. People hired inactives or people in fed. The way the system is now gives us 2 days with out dropping to 1 star but that is if they are a perfect 5 star before. They could still be 1 or 2 stars on day 2 depending on when they left.
How it effects the company is bogus, a company with 23/25(2 people missing) spots filled makes about as much as a company with 25/25 (full). But yet when someone drops to 1 star the whole company tanks. Almost makes me think who ever is the 1 star worker was the boss for the day and gave everyone the day off. I don't like having to hire and fire daily but if you don't your company is hurt when people go missing for more then 2 days.
A simple fix is to let it go to a few more days, and to lower the effects down.
I also don't like how when you forget to train for the day or go camping for the weekend you have to get someone else to run it or come back to at least 2 days of low to no income and like 2 more days to get it back where it was. I have also been hit by the crons not working then come back to 2 in a row... The boss needs days off too where not training anyone does not hurt till after 3 or so days. But I do agree with it making nothing after 3 days... workers might not riot and party soon as the boss is out of the office but after a few days work rate would drop.
By T-Rex [2726]
I agree for sure, but you forget why they set this in place the way they did. People hired inactives or people in fed. The way the system is now gives us 2 days with out dropping to 1 star but that is if they are a perfect 5 star before. They could still be 1 or 2 stars on day 2 depending on when they left.
How it effects the company is bogus, a company with 23/25(2 people missing) spots filled makes about as much as a company with 25/25 (full). But yet when someone drops to 1 star the whole company tanks. Almost makes me think who ever is the 1 star worker was the boss for the day and gave everyone the day off. I don't like having to hire and fire daily but if you don't your company is hurt when people go missing for more then 2 days.
A simple fix is to let it go to a few more days, and to lower the effects down.
I also don't like how when you forget to train for the day or go camping for the weekend you have to get someone else to run it or come back to at least 2 days of low to no income and like 2 more days to get it back where it was. I have also been hit by the crons not working then come back to 2 in a row... The boss needs days off too where not training anyone does not hurt till after 3 or so days. But I do agree with it making nothing after 3 days... workers might not riot and party soon as the boss is out of the office but after a few days work rate would drop.
Why director/company who hires genuine emp should suffer for the other they could have simply make it impossible to keep an emp who is in fed or who is inactive for 7days isnt it? why penalised a all system?? I am a developer too and implementing such update who not be difficult...
if emp inactive 7days or in fed then
system automatically fire emp and notify director
end if
By T-Rex [2726]
I agree for sure, but you forget why they set this in place the way they did. People hired inactives or people in fed. The way the system is now gives us 2 days with out dropping to 1 star but that is if they are a perfect 5 star before. They could still be 1 or 2 stars on day 2 depending on when they left.
How it effects the company is bogus, a company with 23/25(2 people missing) spots filled makes about as much as a company with 25/25 (full). But yet when someone drops to 1 star the whole company tanks. Almost makes me think who ever is the 1 star worker was the boss for the day and gave everyone the day off. I don't like having to hire and fire daily but if you don't your company is hurt when people go missing for more then 2 days.
A simple fix is to let it go to a few more days, and to lower the effects down.
I also don't like how when you forget to train for the day or go camping for the weekend you have to get someone else to run it or come back to at least 2 days of low to no income and like 2 more days to get it back where it was. I have also been hit by the crons not working then come back to 2 in a row... The boss needs days off too where not training anyone does not hurt till after 3 or so days. But I do agree with it making nothing after 3 days... workers might not riot and party soon as the boss is out of the office but after a few days work rate would drop.
Why director/company who hires genuine emp should suffer for the other they could have simply make it impossible to keep an emp who is in fed or who is inactive for 7days isnt it? why penalised a all system?? I am a developer too and implementing such update who not be difficult...
if emp inactive 7days or in fed then
system automatically fire emp and notify director
end if
not too sure that is needed, but not asking for too much. just a brief rethink over what can be done would be hugely appreciated, and would mean a lot for company enthusiasts, and would definitely add a new dimension to guys like me who are in torn, mainly due to this side torn.
Wednesday report: Yesterday we had a total of 950 customers and made a gross income of $37,490,625!
Best day ever,everybody 4/5 star and i managed this on 0% popularity and 97% efficiency
If i had 1 employee on 2 stars i would of gone down to around the 80/90% efficiency and prob around the 20 mill income.
company's are not right at all,look at job position across company's,it's clear that some don't work and therfore no point in putting anyone in that position.
Directors do have to hire the right people,yeas you can have a full company with 5* employees but you have to remember the stat caps,if you have 25 low stat guys working,yes they will be 5* but unless you use the job calculator they could only be giving like 50% efficiency to their job.
Mine all give 125/150% .
i agree that you should not get away with hiring inactives and the efficiency/income lost should be relative to the size of the company and how many others are also inactive.
Vacation setting fine but I want to see fewer inactive companies, they only drag down the legit active ones of people who DO actively manage their companies.
By Danny_ [75604]
Vacation setting fine but I want to see fewer inactive companies, they only drag down the legit active ones of people who DO actively manage their companies.
Yeah inactive companys should be deleted,if your inactive or cant be arsed running a company you should get spanked.
By Danny_ [75604]
Vacation setting fine but I want to see fewer inactive companies, they only drag down the legit active ones of people who DO actively manage their companies.
Yeah inactive companys should be deleted,if your inactive or cant be arsed running a company you should get spanked.
By Danny_ [75604]
Vacation setting fine but I want to see fewer inactive companies, they only drag down the legit active ones of people who DO actively manage their companies.
Yeah inactive companys should be deleted,if your inactive or cant be arsed running a company you should get spanked.
By Man_O_War [1116436]
I totally support you. Big thump ups from me.
By Azrael [980075]
By Danny_ [75604]
Vacation setting fine but I want to see fewer inactive companies, they only drag down the legit active ones of people who DO actively manage their companies.
Yeah inactive companys should be deleted,if your inactive or cant be arsed running a company you should get spanked.
Agree.
I agree with this too then active company will have more popularity then more profit maybe... also the system should buy company ppl dont want at 50-75% of buying price let say as the property system of before...
![Netsky [960069]](http://awardimages.torn.com/960069-17206-large.png "Netsky [960069]")
![TH3_ACE [633572]](http://awardimages.torn.com/633572-58834-large.png "TH3_ACE [633572]")
![Azrael [980075]](http://awardimages.torn.com/980075-91876-large.png "Azrael [980075]")
![Tor [162798]](http://awardimages.torn.com/162798-14621-large.png "Tor [162798]")
![T_J [1380377]](http://awardimages.torn.com/1380377-32687-large.png "T_J [1380377]")
![Lek [295553]](http://awardimages.torn.com/295553-49346-large.png "Lek [295553]")
![-BlackraM- [621321]](http://awardimages.torn.com/621321-86097-large.png "-BlackraM- [621321]")
![Faddy [1351687]](http://awardimages.torn.com/1351687-65934-large.png "Faddy [1351687]")
![T-Rex [2726]](http://awardimages.torn.com/2726-53875-large.png "T-Rex [2726]")
![Chrispyking [685249]](http://awardimages.torn.com/685249-42838-large.png "Chrispyking [685249]")
![Danny_ [75604]](http://awardimages.torn.com/75604-5721-large.png "Danny_ [75604]")
![Man-O-War [1116436]](http://awardimages.torn.com/1116436-47143-large.png "Man-O-War [1116436]")
![BigBoi [1638890]](http://awardimages.torn.com/1638890-8078-large.png "BigBoi [1638890]")
Follow @TornRPG