Forums
First  << 39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51 >>  Last
Forum Main>>Announcements>> Warning: Faction scamming laws
Super secret reinforced spam barrier 2.0
theSilence

ID: 387023
Level: 81
Posts: 388
Score: 76
39ththeSilence [387023]Reply | Quote | Report

Posted on Sat Jun 19, 2010 19:25:51
At the same time that people from Peaceful Factions are being shoehorned into Aggressive Factions or no faction at all, Chedburn decides to make Faction Scamming legal.

Imagine you're currently in a Peaceful Faction and have so much money you keep a great deal of money in the Faction Bank? Once the Peaceful Faction status protection is removed from your faction, you have to hope your Faction 'becomes' viable as an Aggressive Faction. If your Faction fails as an Aggressive Faction, you must either entirely invest in stock, and/or property, and/or items, and/or points, or risk putting the majority of your nest egg into trust with people you're likely to barely know.

Further imagine it becomes practice for Aggressive Factions to to simply 'liberate' the banked monies of the many new formerly Peaceful Faction 'foundlings' the change to Aggressive-only Faction is likely to engender. This could easily be seen as giving lazy, cowardly peaceniks their proper and long-overdue comeuppance. With this recent blessing from Torn City administration to rob other faction players blind, will there really be much the typical formerly Peaceful Faction member can do about it if his/her new-found Aggressive Faction decides to rob him/her of every dollar banked?

The outlook for the Game has become considerably more GRIM. Safeguards are being removed at precisely the time that they are needed the MOST. To me, it's all taking on the appearance of a diabolical wealth-removal/transference scheme.

Last Edited: Sat Jun 19, 2010 19:42:11
Super secret reinforced spam barrier 2.0
L0uCabrasi

ID: 77472
Level: 54
Posts: 2602
Score: 222
MADEL0uCabrasi [77472]Reply | Quote | Report

Posted on Sun Jun 20, 2010 00:19:59
gotta love a conspiracy theory

Super secret reinforced spam barrier 2.0
P_B_Deer_Hunter

ID: 886593
Level: 72
Posts: 1059
Score: 69
P_BP_B_Deer_Hunter [886593]Reply | Quote | Report

Posted on Sun Jun 20, 2010 00:26:17
for what it is worth my vote is to increase the amount of cash that your vault can hold

Super secret reinforced spam barrier 2.0
axels_mrs
ID: 857046
Level: 35
Posts: 438
Score: 11
axels_mrs [857046]Reply | Quote | Report

Posted on Sun Jun 20, 2010 01:20:09
"We do not take any action against company scamming, why factions?"


i wasnt aware anyone other than the director of a company had access to anything, so how can you compare the two?

Super secret reinforced spam barrier 2.0
DocHoliday

ID: 1015507
Level: 77
Posts: 4261
Score: 2606
eVøDocHoliday [1015507]Reply | Quote | Report

Posted on Sun Jun 20, 2010 05:14:28
By BC-AliH [857046]
"We do not take any action against company scamming, why factions?"


i wasnt aware anyone other than the director of a company had access to anything, so how can you compare the two?


^^^



Super secret reinforced spam barrier 2.0
10monkeyman10
ID: 1147662
Level: 19
Posts: 103
Score: -88
10monkeyman10 [1147662]Reply | Quote | Report

Posted on Sun Jun 20, 2010 10:49:10
cool

Super secret reinforced spam barrier 2.0
FrOsTy

ID: 215567
Level: 56
Posts: 1760
Score: 573
FrOsTy [215567]Reply | Quote | Report

Posted on Sun Jun 20, 2010 10:50:20
By Doc-Holiday [1015507]
By BC-AliH [857046]
"We do not take any action against company scamming, why factions?"


i wasnt aware anyone other than the director of a company had access to anything, so how can you compare the two?


^^^



What he ment was company scams like where a person mails the director and states that they can make the company 5 stars in just a few minutes and then they take the company "yes there are players that fall for this" and the ones that offer to advertise and then wont give the company back ect ect ect.




Save a tree. Eat a Beaver.
Super secret reinforced spam barrier 2.0
Gzzz

ID: 473551
Level: 69
Posts: 1950
Score: 542
Gzzz [473551]Reply | Quote | Report

Posted on Sun Jun 20, 2010 11:01:48
By FrOsTy [215567]
By Doc-Holiday [1015507]
By BC-AliH [857046]
"We do not take any action against company scamming, why factions?"


i wasnt aware anyone other than the director of a company had access to anything, so how can you compare the two?


^^^



What he ment was company scams like where a person mails the director and states that they can make the company 5 stars in just a few minutes and then they take the company "yes there are players that fall for this" and the ones that offer to advertise and then wont give the company back ect ect ect.


That's like comparing apples with oranges.


Super secret reinforced spam barrier 2.0
FrOsTy

ID: 215567
Level: 56
Posts: 1760
Score: 573
FrOsTy [215567]Reply | Quote | Report

Posted on Sun Jun 20, 2010 11:12:53
No not really it is still the owner/leader giving access to fund's or the company and getting nailed. All goes back to being careful about who you give access to funds or who you give director to for whatever reason and expect to have it giving back.




Save a tree. Eat a Beaver.
Super secret reinforced spam barrier 2.0
g_ho

ID: 1261819
Level: 65
Posts: 1172
Score: 298
DUIg_ho [1261819]Reply | Quote | Report

Posted on Sun Jun 20, 2010 12:01:12
you can say it's the same all you want but it is easy to run a company on your own, so you need to trust less people. It is nearly impossible to run an aggressive faction on your own, especially if in the new system wars break out all the time. There is no way to protect your people 24 hours a day with 1 person.

apples and oranges, like they said.

so, I can successfully run a company with very little risk and find a friend for when I'm away for a few days. But a faction, first of all to have someone available to dole out cash 24/7 I would need to trust someone half a world away, with opposite schedules, which means I actually am less likely to know them that well.

anywho, it's a weird change, and I hope safeguards are being looked at like some of the ideas in this thread.

Last Edited: Sun Jun 20, 2010 12:03:02
Super secret reinforced spam barrier 2.0
FrOsTy

ID: 215567
Level: 56
Posts: 1760
Score: 573
FrOsTy [215567]Reply | Quote | Report

Posted on Sun Jun 20, 2010 12:12:25
Im sorry but i see no difference at all between giving someone director in your company for what ever the reason and them scamming you and not giving it back or giving said friend access to your faction funds and them scamming it from you.
I will agree to less risk with company because of stocks to help with the advert part and that lowers the possibility of having to give up director to another player apart from going on a holiday. A scammer is a scammer and a scam is a scam. And the actions of the owner/leader giving director or access is really the only way that the scams can fall thru and work to start with.




Save a tree. Eat a Beaver.
Super secret reinforced spam barrier 2.0
g_ho

ID: 1261819
Level: 65
Posts: 1172
Score: 298
DUIg_ho [1261819]Reply | Quote | Report

Posted on Sun Jun 20, 2010 12:29:26
but you agree that I can successfully run my company solo and agree that is not true of a successful faction?

if I trusted no one, other than a few days of missed trains, it runs fine under one person. I cannot see that being the case with any HoF Faction, the ability to run it all on one's own. So you HAVE to trust someone to have a chance at the big leagues, so in this new system you HAVE to open yourself to possible scammers to succeed.

edit:
I don't think there is any other way of getting head in this game ( market, stock market, trades, etc) that doesn't have some level of safeguard. It just seems fair that with scamming legal a level of safeguard should be put into action. That's all I mean, and would like to know if anything is in the works.

Last Edited: Sun Jun 20, 2010 12:40:02
Super secret reinforced spam barrier 2.0
Evil_Princess
ID: 1350006
Level: 40
Posts: 585
Score: -6
Evil_Princess [1350006]Reply | Quote | Report

Posted on Sun Jun 20, 2010 12:30:17
By theSilence [387023]
At the same time that people from Peaceful Factions are being shoehorned into Aggressive Factions or no faction at all, Chedburn decides to make Faction Scamming legal.

Imagine you're currently in a Peaceful Faction and have so much money you keep a great deal of money in the Faction Bank? Once the Peaceful Faction status protection is removed from your faction, you have to hope your Faction 'becomes' viable as an Aggressive Faction. If your Faction fails as an Aggressive Faction, you must either entirely invest in stock, and/or property, and/or items, and/or points, or risk putting the majority of your nest egg into trust with people you're likely to barely know.

Further imagine it becomes practice for Aggressive Factions to to simply 'liberate' the banked monies of the many new formerly Peaceful Faction 'foundlings' the change to Aggressive-only Faction is likely to engender. This could easily be seen as giving lazy, cowardly peaceniks their proper and long-overdue comeuppance. With this recent blessing from Torn City administration to rob other faction players blind, will there really be much the typical formerly Peaceful Faction member can do about it if his/her new-found Aggressive Faction decides to rob him/her of every dollar banked?

The outlook for the Game has become considerably more GRIM. Safeguards are being removed at precisely the time that they are needed the MOST. To me, it's all taking on the appearance of a diabolical wealth-removal/transference scheme.


100% agreed.

Random gifts for B+R


Super secret reinforced spam barrier 2.0
FrOsTy

ID: 215567
Level: 56
Posts: 1760
Score: 573
FrOsTy [215567]Reply | Quote | Report

Posted on Sun Jun 20, 2010 12:46:51
By g_ho [1261819]
but you agree that I can successfully run my company solo and agree that is not true of a successful faction?

if I trusted no one, other than a few days of missed trains, it runs fine under one person. I cannot see that being the case with any HoF Faction, the ability to run it all on one's own. So you HAVE to trust someone to have a chance at the big leagues, so in this new system you HAVE to open yourself to possible scammers to succeed.


What about the player that cant afford the stocks for free advertising? What about faction leaders in w/e type faction that has players join then said player donates cash and the leader keeps it? There is alot more avenues you can add or think about other than just hof factions that are aggressive and trying to keep rollin on. And tbh im not trying to debate this. I merely responded to another player response about the company director having the only access to company funds so how can it really be scammed thus i gave other examples of how some of the scammers are going about scamming players out of their companies.




Save a tree. Eat a Beaver.
Super secret reinforced spam barrier 2.0
g_ho

ID: 1261819
Level: 65
Posts: 1172
Score: 298
DUIg_ho [1261819]Reply | Quote | Report

Posted on Sun Jun 20, 2010 12:52:34
okay, wrong place to debate, I understand, thank you.

but not being able to afford free advertising isn't a scam. I am only saying that to be a successful faction now you have very little option but to open yourself to scamming, unlike any other avenue in Torn. Not just HoF, but anyone who wants to grow a large and active faction. So we will agree to disagree

Super secret reinforced spam barrier 2.0
mr_foxy
ID: 1352519
Level: 15
Posts: 101
Score: -43
mr_foxy [1352519]Reply | Quote | Report

Posted on Sun Jun 20, 2010 14:01:12
really sad but cool

Super secret reinforced spam barrier 2.0
Winning
ID: 552179
Level: 29
Posts: 157
Score: 83
Winning [552179]Reply | Quote | Report

Posted on Sun Jun 20, 2010 14:01:40
g_ho, you're spot on everything you say. It doesn't take a genius to work out what you're saying is true.

The staff are just trying to save what little face they have left.

Super secret reinforced spam barrier 2.0
FrOsTy

ID: 215567
Level: 56
Posts: 1760
Score: 573
FrOsTy [215567]Reply | Quote | Report

Posted on Sun Jun 20, 2010 14:26:22
By Ninos [552179]
g_ho, you're spot on everything you say. It doesn't take a genius to work out what you're saying is true.

The staff are just trying to save what little face they have left.


Sadly, you have no clue what your talking about. I think her and I are both intelligent enough people to know exactly what the other is talking about. I have never once said anything she has stated wasnt true nor have i disagreed with everything she has said.




Save a tree. Eat a Beaver.
Super secret reinforced spam barrier 2.0
Kassak

ID: 646239
Level: 54
Posts: 5548
Score: 2031
Kassak [646239]Reply | Quote | Report

Posted on Sun Jun 20, 2010 15:38:42
Rating -666
:|o

Super secret reinforced spam barrier 2.0
Krahl

ID: 457603
Level: 67
Posts: 530
Score: 112
NuBzKrahl [457603]Reply | Quote | Report

Posted on Sun Jun 20, 2010 15:44:42
you give someone access to something, there is always a possibility they will run off with it. Torn City shouldn't be a place where you nicely store your money and it's safe for ever. People have to earn your trust, you have to earn their trust and you have to decide who to trust. In my opinion this change is realistic. You don't go and entrust millions to someone you've known for a while. As long as this change is true for everyone it's fair'ish. Although this change effects richer ppl more, which means the rich are the ones who have to look out.

Although ppl should still have the option to stay peacefull, but want to go agressive due to the incentives. This way ppl don't have to be forced to trust others.

Last Edited: Sun Jun 20, 2010 15:48:20
Super secret reinforced spam barrier 2.0
g_ho

ID: 1261819
Level: 65
Posts: 1172
Score: 298
DUIg_ho [1261819]Reply | Quote | Report

Posted on Sun Jun 20, 2010 16:00:42
By FrOsTy [215567]
By Ninos [552179]
g_ho, you're spot on everything you say. It doesn't take a genius to work out what you're saying is true.

The staff are just trying to save what little face they have left.


Sadly, you have no clue what your talking about. I think her and I are both intelligent enough people to know exactly what the other is talking about. I have never once said anything she has stated wasnt true nor have i disagreed with everything she has said.


and nor do I think that the rule change is a bad one - if some level of protection - like some mentioned in this thread - are instated. As Fr0sty said, there are a million ways to get scammed, but usually they are buyer-beware situations. I just don't think factions should be that way. It's not about staff saving face; he and I were just in a conversation


Super secret reinforced spam barrier 2.0
HIRING_EVERYONE

ID: 699243
Level: 57
Posts: 2287
Score: 534
HIRING_EVERYONE [699243]Reply | Quote | Report

Posted on Sun Jun 20, 2010 16:54:10
Ok i have to chime in here. I'm 50/50 on this. The stupid people that run factions and give multiple people access to the bank are the ones that are messing this up for everyone. Then you have the morons that I'm sure report having 100k stolen. There could be countless staff members and they would still be hard pressed to sort all the complaints. I think there should be protection from your co-leader stealing from the faction, but not anyone else. If you are stupid enough to give a lot of people access then you should get robbed. Like i said tho, I do think co-leaders scamming should be illegal and protected against. It wouldn't be nearly as difficult for staff to enforce that as it is for them to enforce it all.

Super secret reinforced spam barrier 2.0
Evil_Cockney

ID: 420168
Level: 82
Posts: 4207
Score: 921
Evil_Cockney [420168]Reply | Quote | Report

Posted on Sun Jun 20, 2010 17:32:56
Wake up people, Ched couldn't give a crap what you think as long as the money keeps rolling in.

Super secret reinforced spam barrier 2.0
NatasKhan
ID: 51123
Level: 34
Posts: 71
Score: 1
NatasKhan [51123]Reply | Quote | Report

Posted on Sun Jun 20, 2010 19:17:18
pretty sad how they just "drop the ball" because its "too much work" to do f**king pathetic first people are aloud to scam other people and hack their account now Companys are getting nailed and so are factions well maybe if they f**king grew a pair and stoped letting people scam in the first place they wouldn't have this whole f**ked circle in the first place this games gone to shit since they've aloud scammers into it

Super secret reinforced spam barrier 2.0
ImTheN00B

ID: 1290007
Level: 65
Posts: 2056
Score: 801
~cF~ImTheN00B [1290007]Reply | Quote | Report

Posted on Sun Jun 20, 2010 19:46:37
By Evil_Cockney [420168]
Wake up people, Ched couldn't give a crap what you think as long as the money keeps rolling in.


this ^^ guess saying "i wont buy dps" wont work since i dont do that anyways

Super secret reinforced spam barrier 2.0
D_Dub

ID: 46969
Level: 50
Posts: 1800
Score: 106
D_Dub [46969]Reply | Quote | Report

Posted on Mon Jun 21, 2010 06:27:41
so maybe this has already been said... but why cant they just give leader control of whether or not the co-leader can access the bank? put a daily limit on co-leader taking money out? something like that?....

Super secret reinforced spam barrier 2.0
Voices

ID: 387969
Level: 69
Posts: 4370
Score: 2346
Voices [387969]Reply | Quote | Report

Posted on Mon Jun 21, 2010 09:26:56
By Evil_Princess [1350006]
This sucks, we should have more staff!


No, Just ones that do things decentally.

Super secret reinforced spam barrier 2.0
Qbit

ID: 729393
Level: 61
Posts: 312
Score: 257
NuBzQbit [729393]Reply | Quote | Report

Posted on Mon Jun 21, 2010 09:30:09
I believe I understand why the staff have chosen to go they way they have, but I also agree with many of the users that this will determinately affect the game. As in any social game, it is only fun when you meet people that you trust and respect. Unfortunately there are always losers out there who like ruining things for others, without the protection we were previously afforded people may begin to trust people less and therefore the social interactions will not be as fun. Is there a posible solution? who knows, but with this many users perhaps we can think of one.

For example: we need more things like OC's right? (course we do!) well my idea is not quite like your standard OC, but why not have factions offer a protection service.
individual people or entire factions can choose the help of a larger faction to protect their money (and items?). Basically a high level faction offers the ability for other people to store their cash and items with them. The faction has to buy a new room, i.e. a deposit type room and the amount of respect they gain depends on how many people choose to accept their service. ONLY the leader has the ability to steal the money or items if they choose too, BUT at the cost of losing 90% of their respect.

if not this idea maybe something else.


Super secret reinforced spam barrier 2.0
10monkeyman10
ID: 1147662
Level: 19
Posts: 103
Score: -88
10monkeyman10 [1147662]Reply | Quote | Report

Posted on Mon Jun 21, 2010 13:16:56
this will help alot thanks:P

Super secret reinforced spam barrier 2.0
Consciousness

ID: 1365950
Level: 55
Posts: 11127
Score: 2192
DBConsciousness [1365950]Reply | Quote | Report

Posted on Mon Jun 21, 2010 14:41:43
wtf!

Forum Main>>Announcements>> Warning: Faction scamming laws
First  << 39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51 >>  Last

This thread has been locked.